Book of Genesis

Title and Naming

The Hebrew title of the book is Bereshit (בְּרֵאשִׁית, meaning 'In the beginning'), derived directly from its opening incipit, following the standard naming convention for books in the ancient Near East and the Torah.^[1][6][7] This title remained common into late antiquity, transcribed as Bresith by Jerome around 390 CE.^[2] In talmudic literature, the book is also referred to as Sefer Ma'aseh Bereshit ('Book of the Work of Creation') or Sefer HaYashar ('Book of the Upright'), named in honor of the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who were considered morally upright before God.^[8] In some medieval manuscripts, it is designated as Sefer Rishon ('First Book') or Sefer Briat HaOlam ('Book of the Creation of the World'). In the Syriac Peshitta tradition, it is known as Sifra de-Brita ('Book of the Creation').

When Hellenistic Jewish scholars translated the scriptures into Koine Greek in the 3rd century BCE, forming the Septuagint, they titled the book Genesis (Γένεσις), meaning 'origin', 'birth', or 'source', describing its contents as the origins of the world and humanity.^[6][9] This Greek title was adopted into the Latin Vulgate as Liber Genesis and subsequently passed into the majority of modern European languages and biblical scholarship.^[1][9] In the Protestant and Germanic tradition, the book is frequently titled the First Book of Moses (German: 1. Buch Mose), an appellation grounded in ancient descriptions by Flavius Josephus in the 1st century CE, who referred to the Torah as the five books of Moses.^[10]

Composition and Authorship

Genesis does not name its author within its text.^[11][12] Jewish and Christian religious tradition attributes the entire Pentateuch to Moses, who according to this belief wrote the books in the wilderness of Kadesh shortly before his death, during the years of wandering.^[13][14] This view was affirmed in early rabbinic literature, including the Mishnah and the Talmud, as well as by Philo, Josephus, and the authors of the New Testament.^[12][15][16] During the Middle Ages, Jewish scholars such as Abraham ibn Ezra noted several textual anomalies and post-Mosaic notices, such as Genesis 12:6 observing that 'the Canaanites were then in the land', which implied an author writing after the Canaanites had been displaced.^[17][18] During the 17th-century Enlightenment, philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Baruch Spinoza systematically challenged Mosaic authorship, while the French Catholic scholar Richard Simon proposed that the Pentateuch was compiled by multiple authors and scribes over centuries from diverse historical documents.^[13][19][20]

The Documentary Hypothesis

In 1753, Jean Astruc identified several interwoven sources in the story of origins in the first eleven chapters of Genesis.^[21] This theory was expanded by Johann Gottfried Eichhorn in 1779 and Karl David Ilgen in 1798, who identified three distinct sources in Genesis and separated the legal material of Deuteronomy.^[22][23] Hermann Hupfeld in 1853 and Eduard Riehm in 1854 further distinguished an older Elohist source containing priestly legislation from a younger narrative Elohist source.^[22][23] Julius Wellhausen synthesized these insights in 1876 into the classic Documentary Hypothesis, arguing that the Pentateuch arose from four originally independent documents: the Yahwist (J), the Elohist (E), the Deuteronomist (D), and the Priestly source (P).^[22][24][25]

According to the Wellhausen model, the Yahwist source (J) was composed in the 9th century BCE in the southern Kingdom of Judah, characterized by an anthropomorphic depiction of God and a vivid narrative style.^[22][24][26] The Elohist source (E) was dated to the 8th century BCE in the northern Kingdom of Israel, featuring a more transcendent deity who reveals himself through dreams and angelic intermediaries.^[24][26] The Deuteronomist (D) originated in 7th-century BCE Judah in connection with the religious reforms of King Josiah around 625 BCE, though it does not appear in Genesis.^[24][26][27] The Priestly source (P) was identified as the latest stratum, composed during the 5th century BCE in Babylon, characterized by precise chronologies, genealogies, covenants, and ritual legislation.^[22][24][26] Wellhausen argued that Ezra brought this newly finalized Pentateuch from Babylon to Jerusalem in 458 BCE (Ezra 7:14), and that Nehemiah 8–10 depicts its public proclamation and adoption around 444 BCE.^[24][28][29] Under this model, Genesis formed part of a continuous literary work, the Hexateuch, spanning Genesis through Joshua.^[22][23]

Supplementary and Contemporary Models

From the 1970s onward, the classic Documentary Hypothesis was challenged by scholars such as John Van Seters, Rolf Rendtorff, and Hans Heinrich Schmid.^[30] In modern biblical scholarship, the independent existence of an Elohist source is widely questioned, with E often treated as supplementary additions or variations of the non-Priestly narrative.^[27][31] Many contemporary scholars support versions of the Supplementary Hypothesis, identifying an early non-Priestly narrative core (incorporating J materials) that was later revised and expanded by Priestly (P) editors during and after the Babylonian exile.^[27][31] G. I. Davies suggested that J was composed shortly before or during the Babylonian exile, with the final Priestly edition produced late in the exilic period or shortly thereafter.^[32][33] A substantial minority of scholars, observing the almost complete absence of primeval figures and stories throughout the rest of the Hebrew Bible, argue that Genesis 1–11 was composed and attached to the ancestral narratives even later, potentially in the Persian or Hellenistic periods.^[34][35][36] Russell Gmirkin has proposed that Genesis was composed around the 270s BCE, drawing on Hellenistic historians such as Berossus's Babyloniaca and Manetho.^[37][38][39]

Linguistic analyses by Ronald Hendel and Aaron Hornkohl argue on diachronic grounds that the classical Hebrew of Genesis belongs primarily to the pre-exilic and exilic periods, predating the Persian era.^[40][41] Robert Alter holds that, apart from a few rare exceptions, the final text of Genesis is narratively coherent and its contradictions and repetitions are intended; in his view the final redactor did not assemble the old traditions mechanically but used subtle literary techniques to reach a precise aim.^[42][43] Konrad Schmid similarly describes the Torah as collaborative, multi-authored discussion literature reflecting the dialogues of ancient scribal schools.^[44]

Theories of Persian Imperial Authorization

A controversial theory regarding the motivation behind the final compilation of Genesis and the Pentateuch, which has attracted considerable interest, is the hypothesis of Persian imperial authorization.^[45][46] The theory proposes that, following the Achaemenid conquest of Babylon in 539 BCE, the Persians granted Jerusalem a large measure of local autonomy within the empire, on the condition that local authorities produce a single law code accepted by the entire community.^[45][46][47] In post-exilic Yehud, two powerful elite factions had conflicting interests: the priestly families who controlled the Second Temple and traced their authority through Moses and the wilderness wanderings, and the wealthy landowning families ('elders') who traced their hereditary claims to Abraham and the patriarchal promise of the land.^[45][46][48] In this view, the prospect of imperial recognition and local self-governance provided a powerful incentive for both factions to cooperate in producing a single text.^[45][46][48]

Anachronisms and Historical Context

Archaeological and historical investigations have identified numerous anachronisms throughout Genesis that reflect the period of its scribal composition rather than the second millennium BCE.^[49][50][51] A prominent example is the repeated presence of domesticated camels, such as the camel caravan in the Joseph story (Genesis 37:25) and Abraham's servants (Genesis 24:10–11).^[52][53][54] While dromedaries were domesticated in the late second millennium BCE, large-scale camel caravan trade across the Arabian desert only developed under the Neo-Assyrian Empire during the 8th and 7th centuries BCE, indicating that the authors retrojected contemporary economic realities into the patriarchal period.^[53][55][56]

Further anachronisms include references to the Philistines and their king Abimelech in Gerar (Genesis 20:1–18; 26:1–33), whereas archaeological excavations indicate that Philistine settlements on the southern Levantine coast appeared only after 1200 BCE, and Gerar did not become an important urban center until the late 8th or 7th century BCE.^[51][57][58] The designation of Abraham's origin as 'Ur of the Chaldeans' (Genesis 11:28, 31; 15:7) also points to a later period, as the Chaldeans did not enter southern Mesopotamia until the 9th century BCE, and the city was specifically known as Chaldean during the Neo-Babylonian era.^[59][60][61] Similarly, the list of the kings of Edom before any king reigned in Israel (Genesis 36:31–39) presupposes the establishment of the Israelite monarchy and reflects the complex state formations of the 8th to 6th centuries BCE.^[18][62][63] Historians Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman conclude that these geographical and political details indicate that the 8th and 7th centuries BCE were the most active period for the initial written consolidation of the patriarchal narratives.^[64]

Manuscripts and Textual History

The original autograph manuscripts of Genesis are lost, and the surviving ancient witnesses exhibit notable textual variations. Textual scholars categorize the textual transmission of Genesis into four primary witnesses: the Masoretic Text, the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Septuagint, and the biblical fragments discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls.^[65][66][67] Among the Dead Sea Scrolls, approximately 23 or 24 scrolls contain portions of Genesis, found primarily in the Qumran caves and other Judean desert sites such as Wadi Murabba'at and Wadi Sdeir.^[68] The earliest surviving Hebrew manuscript is 6QpaleoGen, written in the paleo-Hebrew script and dated between 250 and 150 BCE.^[68][69] Armin Lange distinguishes among the Genesis manuscripts proto-Masoretic texts (such as MurGen–Exod.Numa and 4QGenb), semi-Masoretic texts similar to the Masoretic Text that later became authoritative in Judaism (such as 4Q1 and 4Q11), and texts close to both the Masoretic Text and the Samaritan Pentateuch (such as 4Q3, 4Q5, 4Q7, and 4Q9). In addition, the Taylor-Schechter Genizah Collection in Cambridge preserves early medieval unvocalized fragments of Genesis textually identical to the Codex Leningradensis.^[66][70]

The Samaritan Pentateuch, preserved in the ancient Samaritan script, features widespread harmonizing readings designed to smooth syntactical and narrative difficulties.^[66][71] Despite these secondary revisions, it occasionally preserves superior and older readings where it agrees with the Septuagint and the Book of Jubilees against the Masoretic Text.^[66][71] A clear example of copyist scribal error (aberratio oculi) in the Masoretic Text occurs in Genesis 4:8, where the Masoretic Text reads 'And Cain said to Abel his brother. And when they were in the field...', omitting what Cain said; both the Samaritan Pentateuch and the Septuagint preserve the missing phrase: 'Let us go into the field'.^[66][72][73] Ronald Hendel also notes that the Masoretic editors smoothed the speech of Pharaoh in Genesis 45:5–11 into a single continuous monologue, whereas the Septuagint preserves an older, interrupted dialogue.^[66][72]

Chronological Variations Among Traditions

A major divergence among the textual traditions of Genesis concerns the ages and genealogical chronologies of the antediluvian patriarchs in Genesis 5 and the postdiluvian generations in Genesis 11.^[74][75][76] In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of the patriarchs at the birth of their sons are systematically calculated so that all ancestors born before Enoch witnessed Enoch's birth, and all patriarchs contemporary with Enoch died in the very year of the Flood.^[74][77] The Masoretic Text calculates the timeline so that the Exodus occurs precisely in the year 2666 after Creation (Anno Mundi), designed so that the rededication of the Second Temple by Judas Maccabeus in 164 BCE lands on the monumental year 4000 AM.^[74][75][77] The Septuagint adds 100 years to the age of each patriarch at the birth of his firstborn and shortens their remaining lifespan by 100 years, preserving the same total lifespans but extending the absolute chronology from Creation to the Flood (2,262 years in Codex Alexandrinus or 2,242 years in Codex Vaticanus, compared to 1,656 years in the Masoretic Text and 1,307 in the Samaritan Pentateuch).^[78][79] Under the Septuagint's calculations, Methuselah lived 14 years after the Flood without having been aboard the Ark.^[78][79]

Ancient Translations

The Greek translation of Genesis in the Septuagint was completed in Alexandria during the 3rd century BCE, serving as the pioneering model for subsequent translations of biblical books into Greek.^[80] The translator worked with an unvocalized Hebrew Vorlage that occasionally differed from both the Masoretic Text and the Samaritan Pentateuch.^[80] For example, in Genesis 2:2 the Septuagint, agreeing with the Samaritan Pentateuch against the Masoretic Text, states that God completed his work on the sixth day and rested on the seventh. In Genesis 15:11, where the Masoretic Text and the Samaritan Pentateuch say that Abram drove away the birds that came down on the sacrificed animals, the Septuagint translator, vocalizing the unvocalized consonants differently, has Abram sit down beside them.^[80][81] The Septuagint translator Hellenized geographic names, rendering Aram-Naharaim and Paddan-aram as 'Mesopotamia', Goshen as 'Heroopolis', and On as 'Heliopolis', while uniquely noting in Genesis 35:19 and 48:7 that Rachel's tomb was near a hippodrome.^[82][83] Sheol was translated as Hades, and the flood term kataklysmos invoked Greek philosophical concepts of periodic cosmic catastrophes.^[84][85][86]

The Aramaic Targums reflect ancient Jewish interpretive and liturgical traditions.^[66][87] Targum Onkelos, compiled in Palestine and edited in Babylonia in the 3rd to 5th centuries CE, provides a literal translation that systematically circumvents anthropomorphisms; for example, rather than stating that God 'smelled' Noah's sacrifice (Genesis 8:21), it states that God 'accepted it with favor', emphasizing divine transcendence through the concepts of the Shekinah (divine presence) and the Memra (Word).^[66][87][88] Conversely, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan contains extensive aggadic expansions, introduces mentions of angels and Satan (as in Genesis 3:6), and incorporates late glosses such as mentioning the wife and daughter of Muhammad in Genesis 21:21.^[66][89][90]

The Latin Vulgate was produced by Jerome around 398 CE directly from the Hebrew text, combining strict literalism with idiomatic Latin elegance and theological nuances.^[91][92] At times, Jerome inserted christological overtones, translating in Genesis 40:19 that Pharaoh would hang the chief baker 'on a cross' (in cruce) rather than on a tree or wooden pole, which, paired with the mention of 'three days', evoked the crucifixion for Christian readers.^[91] Text-critically, the Vulgate occasionally preserves superior readings matching the Septuagint against the Masoretic Text, as in Genesis 3:17, where Jerome translated that the earth is cursed 'in your work' (in opere tuo, reading Hebrew be'ovdecha) rather than 'because of you' (ba'avurecha), likely reflecting a scribal confusion between the similar Hebrew letters dalet and resh.^[66][93][94]

Literary Genre and Structure

Genesis is an example of a work in the 'antiquities' genre as the ancient Romans knew it, a popular genre telling of the appearance of humans and their ancestors and heroes.^[95][96] Ancient Greek and Roman antiquarian historians compiled genealogies, heroic narratives, origin tales, and regional folklore to connect contemporary families and institutions to a heroic past, intentionally conflating myth, legend, and historical memory.^[97][98] Professor Jean-Louis Ska characterizes the governing principle of the antiquarian writer as the 'law of conservation': ancient material is inherently valuable and preserved rather than discarded.^{[99][100][101]} For post-exilic Israel, antiquarian narrative established the antiquity and prestige of its cultural and religious institutions in dialogue with imperial neighbors, while unifying diverse internal factions.^{[48][99][100]} Tremper Longman classifies Genesis as theological history, wherein the actuality of events is presumed in order to impress upon the reader the religious significance of divine actions.^[102][103]

Structurally, the book is organized around the recurring Hebrew formula elleh toledot (אֵלֶּה תּוֹלְדֹת), meaning 'these are the generations of', 'these are the origins of', or 'this is the historical account of'.^[104] This formula functions as a heading marking transitions between narrative and genealogical units.^[105] In the Wiseman tablet hypothesis, P. J. Wiseman proposed that the toledot represented colophons concluding ancient clay tablets written by the patriarchs themselves, though modern scholarship regards the formula as an internal editorial framework belonging to the Priestly school.^{[106][107][108]} The toledot formula divides the book into ten or eleven sections:^[109][110]

The Toledot Divisions

* Genesis 1:1–2:3: In the beginning (Prologue without a toledot heading) * Genesis 2:4–4:26: Toledot of the Heavens and the Earth (Creation and Fall narrative) * Genesis 5:1–6:8: Book of the Toledot of Adam (Antediluvian genealogy) * Genesis 6:9–9:29: Toledot of Noah (The Flood narrative) * Genesis 10:1–11:9: Toledot of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth (genealogy) * Genesis 11:10–26: Toledot of Shem (Postdiluvian genealogy) * Genesis 11:27–25:11: Toledot of Terah (The Abraham narrative) * Genesis 25:12–18: Toledot of Ishmael (Genealogy of Ishmaelite tribes) * Genesis 25:19–35:29: Toledot of Isaac (The Jacob narrative) * Genesis 36:1–8, 36:9–37:1: Toledot of Esau, father of Edom (Edomite genealogies and kings) * Genesis 37:2–50:26: Toledot of Jacob (The Joseph narrative)^{[106][109][111][112]}

Modern commentators universally recognize a broad bipartite thematic division: the Primeval History (chapters 1–11) and the Ancestral or Patriarchal History (chapters 12–50).^{[113][114][115]} The Primeval History exhibits a symmetrical chiasmic structure centering upon the Flood narrative (chapters 6–9), in which the creation and un-creation before the deluge are mirrored by the recreation and covenant order following it.^[116] The Ancestral History is organized into three major cycles focused on Abraham, Jacob, and Joseph, with the traditions of Isaac serving primarily as a transitional narrative bridge connecting Abraham and Jacob.^{[117][118][119]}

Narrative Summary

Genesis spans the entire arc of cosmic and human beginnings, moving from universal creation to the specific tribal origin of Israel in Egypt.^[3][120] The narrative begins with two complementary creation accounts.^[106][121] In the first account (Genesis 1:1–2:3, associated with the Priestly source), God (Elohim) creates the heavens, earth, vegetation, and living creatures through divine speech over six days, culminating in the creation of male and female in the image of God, followed by divine rest and sanctification of the seventh day (Sabbath).^{[106][121][122]} In the second account (Genesis 2:4b–25, associated with the Yahwist), Yahweh God forms the man (Adam) from the dust of the ground (adamah), breathes the breath of life into his nostrils, plants the Garden of Eden, forms animals, and fashions the woman (Eve) from the man's rib or side to be his companion.^[123][124]

Primeval History (Chapters 1–11)

In the Garden of Eden, God commands the man not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil upon pain of death.^[125] A deceptive talking serpent persuades Eve to eat the forbidden fruit, and she shares it with Adam; immediately realizing their nakedness, they sew fig leaves together to cover themselves.^[125] Upon discovering their disobedience, God passes judgment: the serpent is cursed to crawl on its belly and eat dust, with enduring enmity established between its seed and the woman's seed; the woman is sentenced to pain in childbearing and subordination to her husband; and the man is condemned to grueling agricultural labor on a cursed soil until he returns to dust.^[125] God clothes them in animal skins and expels them from Eden, placing cherubim and a flaming, turning sword to guard the tree of life.^[125]

Eve gives birth to Cain, a cultivator of the soil, and Abel, a shepherd.^[125] When God accepts Abel's offering of animal fat but rejects Cain's agricultural produce, Cain is consumed by jealousy, lures Abel into a field, and murders him.^[125][126] God curses Cain to be a restless wanderer on the earth and places a protective mark upon him to prevent his murder by others.^[125][126] Cain settles in the land of Nod, builds the first city (Enoch), and his lineage produces cultural pioneers: Jabal (pastoralists), Jubal (musicians), and Tubal-cain (metallurgists), concluding with the violent boast of Lamech (Genesis 4:17–24).^[126] Eve subsequently gives birth to Seth, establishing a righteous lineage through which people begin to call on the name of Yahweh.^[125][126] Chapter 5 traces ten generations from Adam to Noah, characterized by long lifespans, highlighting Enoch, who walked with God and was taken without experiencing death.^[126]

Human wickedness increases, exacerbated by marriages between the 'sons of God' (divine beings or angels) and human daughters, producing the heroic Nephilim or giants of renown (Genesis 6:1–4).^[127][128] Regretting that he had made humanity, God decides to destroy all living creatures on the earth, but takes pity on Noah, a righteous man.^[129] God instructs Noah to build an ark measuring 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high, to preserve his family and animals (seven pairs of clean animals and one pair of unclean animals in the Yahwist account; one pair of each animal in the Priestly account).^[130][131] Rain falls for forty days, and the subterranean fountains of the deep burst open, submerging the highest mountains for 150 days.^[130][132] The ark comes to rest on the mountains of Ararat, and after sending forth a raven and a dove that returns with an olive leaf, Noah, his family, and the animals disembark on dry land.^[130][133]

Noah builds an altar and offers burnt offerings, whose pleasing aroma leads God to resolve never again to curse the earth on account of human nature.^[130][134] God establishes an unconditional covenant with Noah, his descendants, and all living creatures, sanctified by the sign of the rainbow, promising that floodwaters will never again destroy all flesh (Genesis 9:1–17).^[126] God gives the Noahic commandments, permitting the eating of animal meat while strictly prohibiting consumption of blood and commanding capital punishment for murder, since humans are made in the divine image.^[126] Subsequently, Noah becomes a vine-dresser, becomes drunk on his wine, and lies uncovered in his tent; his son Ham gazes upon his father's nakedness, prompting Noah to curse Ham's son Canaan to be a slave of slaves to Shem and Japheth.^[135]

Chapter 10 presents the Table of Nations, detailing seventy nations descended from Noah's sons Japheth, Ham, and Shem, including the mighty warrior and hunter Nimrod, founder of kingdoms in Babel, Uruk, Akkad, and Assyria.^[136][137] In chapter 11, humanity unites on the plain of Shinar to build a city and a tower reaching heaven to make a celebrated name for themselves.^[138][139] Viewing this collective hubris as a threat to divine order, God descends, confuses their single language, and scatters them across the earth, giving the site the name Babel.^[139] The primeval history concludes with the ten-generation genealogy from Shem to Terah, the father of Abram, Nahor, and Haran.^[140]

Patriarchal History: Abraham and Sarah (Chapters 12–25)

At God's call, Abram departs Haran with his wife Sarai and nephew Lot for the land of Canaan, where God promises to make him a great nation, bless those who bless him, and grant the land to his descendants.^{[141][142][143]} Arriving at Shechem, and later passing Bethel and Ai, Abram builds altars to Yahweh.^[126] A severe famine compels Abram and Sarai to journey to Egypt; fearing for his life on account of Sarai's beauty, Abram instructs her to claim she is his sister, leading Pharaoh to take her into his harem and enrich Abram with livestock and servants until God strikes Pharaoh's household with severe plagues, prompting their expulsion (Genesis 12:10–20).^[144] Returning to Canaan with vast herds, friction between their respective herdsmen leads Abram and Lot to separate; Lot chooses the fertile Jordan valley near Sodom, while Abram settles by the oaks of Mamre at Hebron, receiving renewed divine promises of innumerable descendants and all the land.^[145]

When four Mesopotamian kings led by Chedorlaomer conquer the five cities of the plain and capture Lot, Abram marshals 318 trained men from his household, defeats the coalition in a night assault near Damascus, and rescues Lot and his property (Genesis 14).^[146] Returning victorious, Abram is blessed at Salem by Melchizedek, king of Salem and priest of God Most High (El Elyon), to whom Abram pays a tenth of the spoils while refusing any personal enrichment from the king of Sodom.^[146][147] In chapter 15, God enters into a formal covenant with Abram: in response to Abram's lament that his servant Eliezer of Damascus is his sole heir, God promises a biological son and descendants as numerous as the stars, a declaration in which Abram 'believed Yahweh, and he counted it to him as righteousness'.^{[148][149][150]} In a visionary covenant ritual involving severed animal carcasses, God predicts four hundred years of oppression for Abram's descendants in an alien land before their triumphant return to inherit the territory stretching from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates.^[149]

Because Sarai remains barren, she gives her Egyptian slave Hagar to Abram as a concubine, but when Hagar conceives and disdains her mistress, Sarai mistreats her, causing Hagar to flee into the wilderness, where the angel of Yahweh comforts her at the spring of Beer-lahai-roi, promising a vast lineage through her son Ishmael (Genesis 16).^[151] In chapter 17, when Abram is ninety-nine years old, God reveals himself as El Shaddai, changes Abram's name to Abraham ('father of a multitude') and Sarai's name to Sarah ('princess'), promises that kings and nations will descend from them, and institutes circumcision (Brit Milah) of all eight-day-old males as the perpetual sign of the covenant.^[152] God confirms that the covenant will be established through a son born to Sarah, named Isaac, while also promising twelve tribal rulers and greatness to Ishmael.^[152]

Yahweh appears to Abraham at the oaks of Mamre in the form of three travelers, whom Abraham lavishly entertains with hospitality; the visitors promise that Sarah will give birth to a son within a year, prompting Sarah to laugh inwardly with skepticism (Genesis 18:1–15).^[153] As the visitors depart toward Sodom, God reveals his intention to investigate the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah; Abraham intercedes boldly with God, bargaining the threshold of righteous people required to spare the cities from fifty down to ten.^[154] Two angels arrive in Sodom and lodge with Lot; when the men of the city surround the house demanding to sexually violate the guests, Lot offers his virgin daughters to protect his visitors, but the mob refuses until the angels strike them blind.^[155] The angels lead Lot, his wife, and two daughters out of the city as fire and brimstone destroy Sodom and Gomorrah; Lot's wife looks back in violation of the divine command and becomes a pillar of salt.^[155][156] In a cave in the hills near Zoar, Lot's daughters intoxicate their father and conceive by him, giving birth to Moab and Ben-ammi, the patriarchal ancestors of the Moabites and Ammonites.^[157]

Abraham travels to Gerar and again presents Sarah as his sister to King Abimelech; God warns Abimelech in a dream that she is married, and Abimelech restores her untouched with restitution gifts, rebuking Abraham, who explains that Sarah is indeed his half-sister through his father (Genesis 20).^[158] Sarah bears Isaac, who is circumcised on the eighth day; at Isaac's weaning feast, Sarah sees Ishmael playing or mocking and demands the expulsion of Hagar and her son.^[159][160] God instructs Abraham to comply, affirming that Abraham's seed will be named through Isaac while also preserving Ishmael in the desert of Beersheba, where he becomes an archer.^[159][160] In chapter 22, God tests Abraham by commanding him to offer Isaac as a burnt offering on Mount Moriah; Abraham binds Isaac on the altar and raises the knife, but the angel of Yahweh halts him, providing a ram caught in a thicket as a substitute and renewing the promises of cosmic blessing and innumerable descendants (the Akedah).^[156][161]

Sarah dies at age 127 in Hebron; Abraham purchases the cave of Machpelah and its field from Ephron the Hittite for 400 silver shekels, securing the patriarchs' first legal landholding in Canaan as a family burial place (Genesis 23).^[156][162] Abraham dispatches his senior servant (traditionally identified with Eliezer) to Mesopotamia to secure a wife for Isaac among his kindred; at a well outside the city of Nahor, the servant encounters Rebekah, daughter of Bethuel and sister of Laban, who displays hospitality and willingness to return to Canaan to marry Isaac (Genesis 24).^[163][164] Abraham marries Keturah, fathering several sons including Midian, whom he gives gifts and sends eastward away from Isaac; Abraham dies at age 175 and is buried in Machpelah by his sons Isaac and Ishmael (Genesis 25:1–11).^[165][166]

Patriarchal History: Isaac and Jacob (Chapters 25–36)

Rebekah, pregnant with twins who struggle in her womb, asks Yahweh about her troubles and learns that two nations are in her womb and that the older will serve the younger; Esau is born first, and Jacob follows holding Esau's heel (Genesis 25:19–28). One day Esau comes home from the field and sells his birthright to Jacob for a dish of lentil stew. Isaac journeys to Gerar during a famine, repeats the wife-sister deception with Rebekah before Abimelech, prospers agriculturally, resolves disputes over water wells in Beersheba, and receives a direct confirmation of the Abrahamic covenant.^[119] When Isaac is old and blind, he prepares to bestow his patriarchal deathbed blessing upon Esau; Rebekah orchestrates a ruse wherein Jacob wears Esau's garments and covers his hands with goatskins, successfully deceiving Isaac into conferring upon him the superior blessing of agricultural fertility and dominance over his brethren.^[167]

Because Esau threatens to kill him, Jacob flees to his mother's brother Laban in Haran, and his departure is explained as a journey to find a wife among his mother's relatives. En route, Jacob spends the night at Bethel, where he dreams of a stairway resting on the earth with its top reaching to heaven and angels ascending and descending; Yahweh stands above it, promising him the land, countless descendants, and divine protection.^[168] Jacob erects his stone pillow as a sacred pillar (matzevah), anoints it with oil, vows to give God a tenth of all he receives, and names the place Bethel ('House of God').^[168][169]

Arriving in Haran, Jacob falls in love with Laban's younger daughter Rachel at a well and agrees to serve Laban for seven years for her hand in marriage.^[170] On the wedding night, Laban deceives Jacob by substituting his elder, tender-eyed daughter Leah, justifying the switch by regional custom that requires the firstborn to marry first.^[170] Jacob completes Leah's bridal week and is given Rachel as well in exchange for another seven years of labor.^[170] Because Leah is unloved, God opens her womb while Rachel remains barren; Leah bears Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah.^[170] Rachel gives her maidservant Bilhah to Jacob, who bears Dan and Naphtali; Leah gives her maidservant Zilpah to Jacob, who bears Gad and Asher; Leah subsequently bears Issachar, Zebulun, and a daughter named Dinah.^[170] Finally, God remembers Rachel, who conceives and gives birth to Joseph.^[170]

Jacob grows wealthy in livestock through selective breeding techniques with peeled poplar, almond, and plane branches placed in drinking troughs, outwitting Laban's attempts to alter his wages.^[171] Seeing Laban's hostility, Jacob flees secretly toward Canaan with his wives, children, and herds, while Rachel steals her father's household idols (teraphim).^[170] Laban pursues them to Gilead; warned by God in a dream not to harm Jacob, Laban searches the tents for his idols, but Rachel conceals them by sitting on her camel saddle and claiming she cannot rise due to the custom of women. Jacob and Laban resolve their grievances, set up a stone heap named Galeed and Mizpah as a boundary marker, make a non-aggression covenant, and part peacefully.^[170]

Preparing to meet Esau, who is advancing with four hundred men, Jacob sends lavish herds ahead as pacification gifts and divides his family across the Ford of Jabbok.^[172] Left alone at night, Jacob wrestles with a mysterious man or divine being until daybreak; when the opponent cannot overcome Jacob, he dislocates Jacob's hip socket and blesses him, renaming him Israel ('he who strives with God and with men and prevails').^[172] Jacob names the place Peniel, saying that he has seen God face to face and yet lived; the text explains that for this reason Israelites do not eat the muscle over the hip socket. The subsequent reunion with Esau is peaceful; Esau embraces Jacob with tears and accepts his gifts, after which Esau returns to Seir and Jacob settles near Shechem.^[172]

In chapter 34, Shechem, son of Hamor the Hivite prince, rapes Dinah; he desires her as his wife, and Hamor proposes intermarriage and commercial alliance.^[173][174] Dinah's brothers deceptively agree on the condition that all males of Shechem undergo circumcision; on the third day, while the men are incapacitated in pain, Simeon and Levi massacre all the males in the city, rescue Dinah, and plunder Shechem's livestock and goods.^[173][174] Jacob censures their action for making him odious among the Canaanites and Perizzites.^[173][174] God instructs Jacob to return to Bethel, where his household buries all foreign gods and amulets under an oak at Shechem; at Bethel, God reaffirms Jacob's name as Israel and renews the patriarchal promises.^[175] Continuing toward Ephrath (Bethlehem), Rachel dies giving birth to Jacob's twelfth son, Benjamin, and is buried by the roadside; Jacob returns to Hebron, where Isaac dies at age 180 and is buried by Esau and Jacob. Chapter 36 details the genealogy, clans, and pre-monarchic kings of Esau (Edom).^[171]

The Joseph Narrative (Chapters 37–50)

Jacob openly favors seventeen-year-old Joseph, the firstborn of Rachel, giving him an ornate multi-colored coat (pasim), which fuels intense hatred among his brothers.^[176] Joseph shares two prophetic dreams (one of his brothers' sheaves bowing to his sheaf, and another of the sun, moon, and eleven stars bowing down to him), provoking their fury.^[176] When Jacob sends Joseph to check on his brothers pasturing flocks near Dothan, they plot to kill him.^[176] Reuben intervenes to save his life, persuading them to throw Joseph into an empty cistern so he might rescue him later, while Judah proposes selling him to an approaching caravan of Ishmaelite/Midianite merchants for twenty shekels of silver.^[176] The brothers dip Joseph's torn coat in goat's blood and present it to Jacob, who concludes that a ferocious beast has devoured his son and refuses all comfort, weeping bitterly.^[176]

Chapter 38 interrupts the Egyptian narrative to recount the family history of Judah in Canaan.^[177][178] Judah has three sons, Er, Onan, and Shelah; Er marries Tamar, but the Lord considers him wicked and lets him die. Under the levirate custom, Onan is obligated to provide offspring for his deceased brother, but he repeatedly spills his semen on the ground to prevent offspring that would not legally be his, and God puts him to death as well. Judah promises Tamar his youngest son Shelah when he comes of age, but fails to fulfill the pledge; Tamar disguises herself as a veiled prostitute at the crossroads of Enaim, and Judah sleeps with her, leaving his signet, cord, and staff as a pledge.^[179] When Tamar is accused of prostitution and sentenced to death by burning for being pregnant, she produces Judah's pledges, compelling him to declare: 'She is more righteous than I'; she gives birth to twin sons, Perez and Zerah, through whom the royal Davidic line descends.^[179]

In Egypt, Joseph is sold to Potiphar, a courtier of Pharaoh; the Lord takes Joseph under his protection, and his master soon hands over all his property for Joseph to manage.^[180][181] Potiphar's wife repeatedly tries to win Joseph over; when he refuses to betray his master, she slanders him to her husband and Joseph is put in prison.^[180][181] In prison, Joseph interprets the dreams of Pharaoh's baker and cupbearer, and the dreams come true: one returns to Pharaoh's service and the other is hanged.^[180][181] The cupbearer is restored to office but forgets Joseph for two full years.

Two years later, Pharaoh has troubling dreams that no one can interpret, and the cupbearer draws attention to Joseph.^[181][182] Brought before Pharaoh, Joseph explains that the dreams mean seven years of good harvests followed by seven years of famine, and advises Pharaoh to prepare for the bad years in advance.^[181][182] Pharaoh names Joseph viceroy of the country, giving him authority to do all that is needed and making him the second man in the kingdom.^[180][182] Joseph gathers a large store of grain, and when the famine comes he sells grain to the people of Egypt and to all the surrounding lands.^[181][182]

Jacob sends ten sons to Egypt to buy grain, retaining Benjamin at home.^[183] Appearing before Joseph, the brothers bow down to the earth, fulfilling his early dreams; Joseph recognizes them but conceals his identity, speaking harshly and accusing them of being spies.^[183] He imprisons Simeon as a hostage and demands they bring their youngest brother Benjamin to verify their story, secretly returning their grain money in their sacks.^[183] When their grain is exhausted, Judah pledges his own life as collateral to convince Jacob to let Benjamin go; returning to Egypt, they are treated to a banquet at Joseph's palace, where Benjamin is given five times the portion of the others.^[183] Testing their solidarity, Joseph has his silver divination cup hidden in Benjamin's sack, intercepts them on their departure, and demands that Benjamin remain as his slave.^[183] Judah delivers an impassioned appeal, explaining that their aged father would die of grief if Benjamin did not return, offering himself as a slave in Benjamin's place.^[183]

Overcome with emotion, Joseph sends his attendants away and reveals himself to his weeping brothers, reassuring them that their deed was transformed by God into a means of saving lives: 'It was not you who sent me here, but God'.^[184] Pharaoh invites Jacob's family to settle in the fertile land of Goshen; Jacob journeys to Egypt with his household, totaling seventy persons, receiving divine encouragement at Beersheba.^[141] Joseph presents Jacob to Pharaoh and orchestrates agrarian reforms during the famine, acquiring the land and livestock of Egypt for Pharaoh in exchange for food, establishing a permanent 20 percent agrarian tax while exempting the land of the priests (Genesis 47:13–26).^[180]

After seventeen years in Egypt, as Jacob nears death, he takes Joseph's sons Ephraim and Manasseh as his own sons and blesses them.^[185][186] Jacob gathers his twelve sons to deliver the poetic Testament or Blessing of Jacob (Genesis 49), rebuking Reuben for defiling his father's concubine Bilhah, condemning Simeon and Levi for their violence at Shechem, and assigning the royal scepter to Judah until Shiloh comes, alongside an extensive blessing of Joseph.^[187][188] Jacob dies at the age of 147, and Joseph carries his body with a large funeral procession to the family tomb in the cave of Machpelah at Hebron.^[185][186] Joseph reassures his fearful brothers of his forgiveness, observing: 'You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good'.^[184] Joseph lives to age 110, makes his brothers swear to carry his bones out of Egypt when God visits them, and is embalmed in a coffin in Egypt, directly linking Genesis to the narrative of the Exodus and the Book of Joshua.^[141][184]

Literary and Mythological Parallels

Biblical scholars have documented profound thematic and structural parallels between Genesis 1–11 and the mythological literature of the ancient Near East, particularly Mesopotamian epics.^{[189][190][191]} The primeval sequence of creation, human hubris, cosmic cataclysm, and post-flood restoration corresponds to a shared ancient Near Eastern paradigm present in the Akkadian Atrahasis Epic, the Sumerian Eridu Genesis, and the Enuma Elish.^{[191][192][193]} In the Enuma Elish, creation proceeds from watery chaos (Tiamat, etymologically cognate with Hebrew tehom, 'the deep', in Genesis 1:2), where the cosmos is separated into upper and lower waters, followed by the creation of celestial luminaries, plants, animals, and humanity.^[194][195] Unlike the polytheistic theomachies of Mesopotamia, where humans are created from the blood of slain rebel gods to relieve the deities of physical labor, Genesis 1 presents creation through effortless transcendent divine command, framing human beings not as menial slaves but as royal representatives bearing the divine image.^[196][197]

The Genesis Flood narrative (chapters 6–9) shows literary convergence with Tablet XI of the Standard Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh and the Atrahasis Epic.^{[130][189][198]} Both the biblical account and the Mesopotamian epics describe a global deluge decreed by divine authority, an ark built by a righteous hero (Utnapishtim / Atrahasis / Noah) covered with pitch, the preservation of animal species, the grounding of the vessel on a northern mountain (Mount Nisir in Gilgamesh, Mount Ararat in Genesis), the release of birds (a raven and a dove) to ascertain whether waters had receded, and subsequent post-flood sacrificial offerings that emit a pleasing odor to the deity.^{[126][193][199]} However, while the Mesopotamian flood is provoked by human noise (hubbub) disturbing the gods' sleep, the biblical flood is explicitly moralized as divine judgment against human violence and moral corruption.^[130]

Further parallels occur across Canaanite and Egyptian literature. The patriarchal depictions of God as El (El Elyon, El Shaddai, El Olam) reflect the pantheon and epithets of ancient Ugaritic texts discovered at Ras Shamra, where El was venerated as the benevolent, aged creator and father of gods and humanity.^{[200][201][202]} The attempted seduction of Joseph by Potiphar's wife in Genesis 39 parallels the Egyptian Tale of Two Brothers (preserved in Papyrus D'Orbiney from the 13th century BCE), where a virtuous younger brother rejects the romantic advances of his elder brother's wife and is subsequently falsely accused using a piece of clothing as evidence.^[203]

Theological Themes

A foundational theological motif uniting the book is the promise to the ancestors, explored influentially by David J. A. Clines in The Theme of the Pentateuch (1978).^{[5][204][205]} Clines concluded that the overarching theme of the Pentateuch is the partial fulfillment, and partial non-fulfillment, of the patriarchal promise.^{[204][205][206]} The divine promise consists of three interrelated components: progeny (an innumerable seed), divine blessing, and possession of the land of Canaan.^{[207][208][209]} The realization of this promise is repeatedly jeopardized across generations by the physical barrenness of the matriarchs Sarah, Rebekah, and Rachel, external political threats in foreign lands, and familial strife, yet God consistently intervenes to preserve the promised seed, culminating in Joseph's preservation of the entire household of Jacob.^{[207][208][210]}

A second major theological theme is divine election and the covenants that structure universal and redemptive history.^[4][211] In the Priestly framework, history progresses through four distinct epochs, each mediated by a representative covenant and distinguished by a sign and a revelation of the divine name: the covenant with all living creatures via Noah marked by the rainbow (God known as Elohim); the covenant with Abraham and his seed marked by circumcision (God known as El Shaddai); and the covenant with Israel alone mediated by Moses marked by the Sabbath (God revealed as Yahweh in Exodus).^{[4][152][211]} The ancestral narrative bridges the primeval alienation between God and humanity by depicting God's election of one family through whom all families of the earth will ultimately be blessed.^{[4][142][211]}

A distinctive narrative theme emphasized by biblical scholar David M. Carr is deception and trickery used by vulnerable figures to survive and prosper against dominant powers.^{[212][213][214]} Throughout Genesis, protagonists facing existential peril employ cunning: Abraham and Isaac falsely present their wives as sisters to foreign monarchs; Jacob outwits Esau for his birthright and blessing; Laban deceives Jacob regarding Leah, only to be outwitted by Jacob's selective livestock breeding and Rachel's theft of the teraphim; Tamar deceives Judah to secure her rightful levirate offspring; and Joseph conceals his identity to test his brothers' moral transformation.^{[167][212][213]} Carr notes that such stories reflect the vulnerability felt by ancient Israelites and that they can be a major way of gaining hope and resisting domination.^{[212][213][214]}

History of Interpretation and Reception

Genesis has generated extensive commentary and philosophical engagement across three millennia in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic traditions.^{[215][216][217]} Within Second Temple Judaism, the book was actively read, adapted, and rewritten.^[68][218] Apocryphal and pseudepigraphical works such as the Book of Jubilees (2nd century BCE) and 1 Enoch retold the narratives of Genesis with explicit solar calendar regulations, angelology, and moral teachings.^[218][219] The Genesis Apocryphon found at Qumran (1QapGen) paraphrased the lives of Noah and Abraham in first-person Aramaic, elaborating on geographical itineraries and personal emotional states.^[220] The Qumran manuscript 4Q158 (Reworked Pentateuch) expanded Jacob's nocturnal wrestling at the Jabbok, adding the explicit verbal text of the blessing bestowed upon him.^[221][222]

In the 1st century CE, Philo of Alexandria produced three comprehensive Greek commentaries on Genesis, applying Stoic and Platonic allegorical hermeneutics: the Quaestiones et solutiones in Genesim, the Allegorical Commentary (interpreting the text as an allegory of the soul's ascent toward virtue, viewing Abraham as learning and Isaac as innate virtue), and expositional treatises on creation (De opificio mundi), Abraham, and Joseph.^[223] Flavius Josephus paraphrased Genesis in books 1 and 2 of his Jewish Antiquities, streamlining the narratives for Roman readers, removing disturbing anthropomorphisms, and citing non-Jewish historians such as Berossus, Manetho, and Nicolaus of Damascus to corroborate biblical accounts of the Flood and antediluvian longevities.^{[224][225][226]}

Rabbinic and Medieval Jewish Reception

Early rabbinic commentary on Genesis crystallized in Genesis Rabbah (Bereshit Rabba), a 5th-century CE Palestinian midrash that expounds the theological and moral implications of the text.^{[216][227][228]} The rabbis asserted that God used the pre-existing Torah as an architectural blueprint to create the world, that light was created on the first day as a garment of divine glory, and that the primordial human was originally created as a two-faced androgynous being before being divided.^{[227][228][229]} Genesis Rabbah also preserves ancient aggadot such as Abraham smashing his father Terah's idols and being miraculously rescued from King Nimrod's fiery furnace.^[228][230] Michael Morgenstern notes that rabbinic exegesis actively sought to counter Christian typological claims, presenting Jacob's struggle with Esau as an archetype of Jewish survival under pagan and Christian Roman hegemony.^[231][232]

During the medieval era, diverse Jewish exegetical schools emerged across the Islamic world and Europe.^[233][234] In 10th-century Baghdad, Saadia Gaon translated the Pentateuch into Arabic (Tafsir) with a rationalistic philosophical commentary harmonizing the biblical text with reason to refute Karaite exegesis.^[233] Karaite scholars in Jerusalem and Baghdad, such as Yaqub al-Qirqisani and Japheth ben Ali, developed sophisticated grammatical and literary interpretations, treating biblical patriarchs as complex psychological characters (round characters) rather than flat ethical archetypes, utilizing the concept of an intentional redactor-narrator (mudawwin).^{[17][235][236]}

In 11th-century northern France, Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki) established the premier commentary combining literal grammatical analysis (peshat) with midrashic exposition, defending Jewish tradition against Christian anti-Jewish polemics and asserting that Genesis begins with creation to validate God's sovereignty and Israel's right to the Promised Land in the wake of the First Crusade.^{[17][234][237]} Rashi's grandson, Rashbam (Samuel ben Meir), emphasized strict contextual peshat, maintaining that Moses formulated the text of Genesis rather than transcribing verbatim dictation.^[17][236] Joseph Bekhor Shor further developed psychological portraits of the patriarchs and noted the presence of scribal editing in the text.^[17][238]

In Muslim Spain, Abraham ibn Ezra composed philological and astrological commentaries, noting anachronisms in Genesis 12:5 and 36 that pointed to post-Mosaic scribal insertions.^{[17][236][239]} Nachmanides (Ramban) integrated northern French peshat with Spanish philosophical and mystical insights, interpreting Genesis through the typological principle that 'the actions of the fathers are a portent for the children', identifying Esau with Rome and Christendom and Isaac's wells with the three Temples of Jerusalem.^[17][240] In 13th-century Provence, David Kimchi (Radak) synthesized Andalusian grammar and Maimonidean philosophy, producing realistic, humanizing psychological portraits of patriarchal actions.^[17][241] In Kabbalah and the Zohar, Genesis became a primary mystical matrix: the six days of creation were mapped onto the ten divine emanations (Sefirot) from Chesed to Malchut, Eden symbolized the heavenly Garden through which souls ascend the palaces (Hechalot), and the patriarchs embodied distinct Sefirotic attributes: Abraham as Chesed (Love), Isaac as Gevurah (Strength), and Jacob as Tiferet (Beauty).^[242][243]

Christian Reception

Genesis is cited approximately 30 times and alluded to over 60 times in the New Testament, providing foundational theological categories for the early church.^[215][217] Jesus cited Genesis 1:27 and 2:24 to ground the permanence of marriage and prohibit divorce (Mark 10:1–12).^[244] The prologue of the Gospel of John deliberately echoes Genesis 1:1 ('In the beginning was the Word'), identifying the divine creative Logos with Jesus Christ.^[245][246] Paul developed his understanding of faith and justification from Abraham's faith in Genesis 15:6 (Romans 3–4; Galatians 3).^{[246][247][248]} He compared Adam with Christ (Romans 5:12–21), whom he calls the new Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45–49).^{[215][246][249]} The Epistle to the Hebrews interpreted Melchizedek as a prototype of Christ's eternal high priesthood (Hebrews 7), while the Book of Revelation closed the biblical canon with imagery from Genesis, including the Tree of Life in the New Jerusalem and Christ as the Lion of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:9; Revelation 5:5; 22:2).^[215][217]

The Church Fathers extensively commented on Genesis, particularly the six days of creation (the Hexaemeron genre).^[216][250] Major Greek treatises were produced by Basil the Great and Gregory of Nyssa (De hominis opificio), who harmonized cosmological descriptions with ancient geocentric physics while viewing humanity's creation in the divine image as a call to deification (theosis).^[249][250] Ephrem the Syrian composed a literal prose commentary in Syriac, engaging with Jewish rabbinic traditions in Nisibis.^[251] In the Latin West, Augustine of Hippo wrote five separate treatises on Genesis, culminating in De Genesi ad litteram (401–415 CE), wherein he argued that creation occurred instantaneously with subsequent development through implanted causal seeds (rationes seminales), warning Christians against interpreting Genesis in ways that contradict established physical science.^{[252][253][254]} Ambrose and Caesarius of Arles interpreted the patriarchal narratives typologically: the three guests at Mamre as a manifestation of the Trinity, the Binding of Isaac as a prefiguration of Christ's crucifixion, and Joseph's betrayal and exaltation as a prototype of Christ's passion and resurrection.^{[255][256][257]} Jerome produced his Hebraicae quaestiones in libro Geneseos, consulting Jewish rabbis in Bethlehem to resolve difficult Hebrew readings.^[258][259]

Medieval Christian writers enriched Genesis narratives with apocryphal traditions from the Life of Adam and Eve and the Book of Jubilees, popularizing legends that Adam was created from eight substances, that the Tree of the Cross grew from Adam's tomb, and that the opening of the Ark's door prefigured the pierced side of the crucified Christ.^[260][261] These paraphrases were widely disseminated through Peter Comestor's Historia Scholastica and vernacular verse chronicles like Jans der Enikel's Weltchronik.^[260][261] During the Reformation, Martin Luther delivered his extensive Lectures on Genesis (1535–1545), using Genesis 3:15 (the Protoevangelium) as the hermeneutical key predicting Christ's victory over Satan, and presenting the patriarchs as champions of faith living solely by God's promise.^[262][263] John Calvin published his commentary in 1554, emphasizing divine accommodation: that Moses wrote under the Holy Spirit in a popular style accessible to uneducated Israelites rather than in technical philosophical terms.^[264]

Islamic Tradition

In Islam, the canonical authority of Genesis is not recognized, as classical Muslim theology views biblical texts as having undergone corruption (tahrif); however, many narratives and figures from Genesis feature prominently in the Quran and the Stories of the Prophets (Qisas al-Anbiya) by commentators such as al-Tabari, al-Tha'labi, and Ibn Kathir.^[265][266] The Quranic presentation contains significant theological distinctions: Adam and Eve (Hawwa) share equal responsibility for eating from the forbidden tree, repent together, and receive divine forgiveness, precluding the Christian doctrine of original sin.^[267][268] Noah (Nuh) is depicted as an unyielding prophetic preacher whose unbelieving son drowns in the Flood despite his father's pleas (Surah Hud 11:42–43).^[269][270] Abraham (Ibrahim) is celebrated as the primordial monotheist (hanif) who smashed the idols of Ur, was rescued from Nimrod's furnace, and constructed the Kaaba in Mecca with Ishmael (Isma'il), who is widely held in Islamic tradition to be the son offered in sacrifice rather than Isaac.^[271][272] Surah Yusuf (chapter 12) dedicates an entire unified chapter to Joseph, presenting him as an exemplar of moral purity, prophetic wisdom, and patience.^[273][274]

Jewish Liturgy and Legal Precepts

In rabbinic Judaism, although Genesis is predominantly narrative, it contains four of the traditional 613 commandments (Mitzvot): the commandment to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28); the sanctification of the Sabbath beginning at sunset (Genesis 2:2–3); the covenant of circumcision (Brit Milah) on the eighth day (Genesis 17:10–12); and the prohibition against eating the sciatic nerve or hip muscle (Gid hanasheh) of an animal (Genesis 32:33), interpreted in Sephardic tradition as requiring the removal of the nerve and in Ashkenazic tradition as refraining from the hindquarters of livestock.^[275][276] In the annual synagogue liturgical cycle, Genesis is divided into twelve weekly Torah portions (parashiyot), read systematically on Saturday mornings, Mondays, and Thursdays, beginning immediately after Simchat Torah:^[277][278]

* Bereshit (1:1–6:8): Creation to the corruption of humanity * Noach (6:9–11:32): The Flood and the Tower of Babel * Lekh Lekha (12:1–17:27): The call of Abraham, covenant, and circumcision * Vayera (18:1–22:24): The visitors at Mamre, Sodom, and the Akedah * Chayei Sarah (23:1–25:18): The purchase of Machpelah and marriage of Isaac and Rebekah * Toledot (25:19–28:9): Birth of Esau and Jacob and the stolen blessing * Vayetzei (28:10–32:3): Jacob's dream at Bethel and marriages in Haran * Vayishlach (32:4–36:43): Jacob's wrestling at Jabbok and reunion with Esau * Vayeshev (37:1–40:23): Joseph sold into Egypt and Judah and Tamar * Miketz (41:1–44:17): Pharaoh's dreams and Joseph's elevation * Vayigash (44:18–47:27): Joseph's disclosure to his brothers and Jacob's descent to Egypt * Vayechi (47:28–50:26): Jacob's blessings of his sons and the deaths of Jacob and Joseph^{[118][277][278]}

In addition, Genesis 21:1–34 (the birth of Isaac) and Genesis 22:1–24 (the Akedah) form the central Torah readings for the first and second days of Rosh Hashanah (New Year), invoking the merits of Abraham and Isaac to seek divine forgiveness on the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur).^[279][280] Genesis 2:1–3 is recited seven times throughout the liturgy of the Sabbath, and Jacob's blessings over Ephraim and Manasseh (Genesis 48:16, 20) are integrated into the nightly bedtime prayer for children and parental Sabbath table blessings.^[281][282]

Modern Biblical Scholarship

In the 20th century, Hermann Gunkel pioneered form criticism (Formgeschichte) with his 1901 commentary on Genesis, examining the ancient oral traditions and folkloric genres (Sagen) that predated the written sources.^{[283][284][285]} Gunkel classified the narratives into primeval legends (myths), patriarchal family sagas, and the Joseph novella.^[286] Gerhard von Rad wrote a widely received commentary on Genesis (1949–1953) with a form-critical focus; he saw the Yahwist mainly as a collector whose own contribution lay in arranging individual sagas into a continuous narrative.^[287] Claus Westermann (1974–1982) produced a massive three-volume commentary combining source and form criticism with comparative ancient Near Eastern literature, arguing that the patriarchal narratives reflect ancient pastoral nomadic life.^[288]

Jewish scholars in the 19th and 20th centuries offered rigorous responses to Protestant higher criticism.^[289] David Zvi Hoffmann and later Yehezkel Kaufmann challenged Wellhausen's evolutionary schema by arguing that the Priestly source (P) was not a late post-exilic composition but the earliest pre-exilic stratum of the Pentateuch, reflecting the sovereign state period of the monarchies of Israel and Judah.^[289][290] Because Wellhausen, the founder of higher criticism, was regarded as an antisemite, the documentary hypothesis was at first not taught in Jewish seminaries; Solomon Schechter summed up this rejection in 1903 with the formula 'Higher criticism is higher anti-Semitism'.^[290] Samson Raphael Hirsch interpreted Genesis symbolically through his linguistic theory of sound-affinities (Lautverwandtschaft), while Benno Jacob published an independent Jewish scientific commentary in Berlin in 1934 that strongly rejected source division, influencing Protestant theologian Karl Barth's conception of creation as the 'house of the universe' (Weltenhaus).^{[291][292][293]} In modern Israeli scholarship, Mordechai Breuer recognized multiple source documents while maintaining that they reflect the divine author's deliberate intention to convey the Torah through multidimensional perspectives.^[294][295]

In Catholic biblical scholarship, the Pontifical Biblical Commission initially restricted historical-critical interpretation, issuing authoritative decrees in 1906 affirming Mosaic authenticity and in 1909 defending the literal historical character of Genesis 1–3 regarding the creation of the first human pair, their original justice, and the Fall.^[296] A major transition occurred with Pope Pius XII's 1943 encyclical Divino afflante Spiritu, which encouraged historical-critical research and the study of ancient literary genres.^[297] In a 1948 letter to Cardinal Suhard, the Biblical Commission clarified that while the historical character of Genesis 1–11 should not be dismissed, these texts employ popular and figurative literary forms suited to their ancient context.^[297] In 1993, the Commission published The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church, formally embracing methodological pluralism, paving the way for comprehensive modern Catholic commentaries such as Lothar Ruppert's four-volume work (1992–2008).^[297]

Science, Evolution, and Creationism

From late antiquity through the early modern era, Jewish and Christian scholars calculated the age of the world based on the genealogical spans recorded in Genesis.^[298][299] In 1650, Anglican Archbishop James Ussher published his famous Annales Veteris Testamenti, concluding that the creation occurred on the entrance of the night preceding Sunday, October 23, 4004 BCE.^[300][301] This Anno Mundi calculation forms the foundation of the traditional Hebrew calendar (which dates creation to 3761 BCE) and the Byzantine calendar.^[302][303] Until the 19th century, European naturalists frequently sought to reconcile geological discoveries with the Genesis narrative; for example, Johann Jakob Scheuchzer in the 18th century interpreted fossil beds as direct evidence of victims drowned in the biblical Flood.^[304][305]

With the rise of modern geology, paleontology, and evolutionary biology, scholars demonstrated that the Earth is approximately 4.54 billion years old and that life evolved over billions of years, rendering literal historical readings untenable in scientific discourse.^[304][306] Mainstream Catholic and Protestant theologians adopted concordist, allegorical, or evolutionary creationist frameworks.^{[307][308][309]} In 1927, Catholic priest and physicist Georges Lemaître formulated the Big Bang theory, which, following several popes since Pius XII, Pope Francis said in 2014 does not cancel the intervention of a divine creator.^[307] Thinkers such as Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and theologian John F. Haught argued for evolutionary theology, interpreting the ongoing evolution of the cosmos as the unfolding of divine creative activity rather than purposeless chance.^{[309][310][311]}

Conversely, fundamentalist and evangelical movements, particularly in the United States, developed modern creationism.^[306] Following the publication of The Genesis Flood by John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris in 1961, and the founding of the Creation Research Society in 1963, Young Earth Creationists have maintained that the universe and all living kinds were created in six literal 24-hour days approximately 6,000 to 10,000 years ago, that geological strata are the result of Noah's universal flood, and that scientific dating techniques are fundamentally flawed.^{[299][306][308]} Old Earth Creationists, by contrast, interpret the 'days' of Genesis as prolonged cosmic epochs (the Day-Age theory) or insert vast geological eras between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 (the Gap theory).^{[299][312][313]}

Cultural and Artistic Impact

Genesis has exerted an enduring influence on Western art, literature, music, and social philosophy.^{[314][315][316]} The declaration that humanity is made in the image and likeness of God (imago Dei, Genesis 1:26–27) provided a foundational pillar for human dignity, moral equality, and universal human rights in Western philosophy, cited by religious historian Elaine Pagels as a conceptual ancestor to Enlightenment principles of equality in the United States Declaration of Independence.^[314][317]

In the visual arts, illuminated manuscripts such as the 6th-century Vienna Genesis and the 7th-century Ashburnham Pentateuch established early iconographical traditions for the creation, deluge, and patriarchal cycles.^[315] The 5th-century mosaic nave cycle of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome juxtaposed patriarchal scenes with the Exodus and New Testament motifs.^[315] The bronze Bernward Doors of Hildesheim Cathedral (c. 1015) paired scenes of primeval sin from Genesis with scenes from the life of Christ, while Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel ceiling frescoes (1508–1512) depicted the Creation, the Fall, and Noah in nine monumental central panels.^[315][318] Pieter Bruegel the Elder famously illustrated The Tower of Babel (1563), and Rembrandt depicted the sacrifice of Isaac and Jacob wrestling with the angel.

In literature, John Milton's epic Paradise Lost (1667) transformed the Genesis narrative of Adam, Eve, and the Fall into an influential work of English poetry.^[319][320] Salomon Gessner's The Death of Abel (1760) prompted a sympathetic reassessment of Cain.^[321] José Saramago's 2009 novel Cain has its protagonist travel through biblical history.^[321][322] Thomas Mann spent sixteen years composing his monumental four-part novel sequence Joseph and His Brothers (Joseph und seine Brüder, 1933–1943), which Mann said several times he intended as a way to take myth back from the fascists and, through psychology, turn it to humane ends.^[323] In 2009, underground cartoonist Robert Crumb published an unabridged graphic novel adaptation, The Book of Genesis Illustrated, depicting the biblical text with literal, unsparing historical realism.^[324][325]

In music, Joseph Haydn's oratorio The Creation (Die Schöpfung, 1798) and George Frideric Handel's Joseph and His Brethren (1743) drew directly from Genesis narratives.^[326][327] Camille Saint-Saëns composed the oratorio Le Déluge (1876), Arnold Schoenberg composed the unfinished oratorio Die Jakobsleiter (1917–1922), and Igor Stravinsky composed the cantata Babel (1944).^[327][328] In 1945, seven prominent exile composers (Arnold Schoenberg, Darius Milhaud, Igor Stravinsky, Alexandre Tansman, Mario Castelnuovo-Tedesco, Ernst Toch, and Nathaniel Shilkret) collaborated to produce the Genesis Suite for orchestra, narrator, and chorus.^[326][329] In cinema, director John Huston dramatized chapters 1–22 in the 1966 epic The Bible: In the Beginning..., while Darren Aronofsky's Noah (2014) reinterpreted the deluge narrative.^{[330][331][332]} On Christmas Eve 1968, the Apollo 8 astronauts William Anders, Jim Lovell, and Frank Borman broadcast a live reading of Genesis 1:1–10 to earth while orbiting the Moon, marking one of the most widely viewed television broadcasts in human history.

References

1. Hamilton 1990, p. 1. (Hamilton, Victor P (1990). The Book of Genesis: chapters 1–17. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-2521-6.)
2. Vgl. Hieronymus: Prologus galeatus zu den Königebüchern der Vulgata.
3. Sweeney 2012, p. 657. (Sweeney, Marvin (2012). "Genesis in the Context of Jewish Thought". In Evans, Craig A.; Lohr, Joel N. (eds.). The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-22653-1.)
4. Bandstra 2004, pp. 28–29. (Bandstra, Barry L (2004). Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible. Wadsworth. ISBN 978-0-495-39105-0.)
5. Konrad Schmid: Genesis in the Pentateuch. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements. Band 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 27–50, hier S. 29–31.
6. Carr 2000, p. 491. (Carr, David M. (2000). "Genesis, Book of". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Amsterdam University Press. ISBN 978-0-567-37287-1.)
7. משה דוד קאסוטו, אנציקלופדיה מקראית: אוצר הידיעות של המקרא ותקופתו, כרך ב, ירושלים: מוסד ביאליק, 1957, עמ' 317
8. Талмуд, Авода зара 25а.
9. Ronald S. Hendel, « Book of Genesis », The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, vol. 2, p. 933.
10. Josephus: Contra Apionem I, 38 f.
11. Carr, David McLain (1996-01-01). Reading the Fractures of Genesis: Historical and Literary Approaches. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-0-664-22071-6. Unlike many modern texts, ancient Israelite historical texts like Genesis were originally circulated anonymously. This means that no kind of authorship rights could impede adaptation or modification. To be sure, already in the postexilic period we see references to the 'Torah of Moses' of which Genesis is a part. Nevertheless, these references seem to be more characterizations of the content of the Pentateuch with its focus on the Moses life story and instructions mediated by him to Israel, than expressions of any belief that he was the author of the entire Pentateuch. Explicit attribution of the authorship of the Pentateuch to Moses does not occur until the Hellenistic period.
12. (en) Raymond B. Dillard, An Introduction to the Old Testament, Zondervan, 1994 (lire en ligne), p. 39. | //books.google.com/books?id=qRSzg2oh5eMC
13. Van Seters 1998, p. 5. (Van Seters, John (1998). "The Pentateuch". In Steven L. McKenzie, Matt Patrick Graham (ed.). The Hebrew Bible Today: An Introduction to Critical Issues. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-25652-4.)
14. مقدمة في سفر التكوين، الأنبا تكلا، 23 مايو 2013. نسخة محفوظة 7 سبتمبر 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين
15. např. Mk 12, 26 (Kral, ČEP)
16. RENDTORFF, Rolf. Hebrejská bible a dějiny. Úvod do starozákonní literatury. 3. vyd. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2003. ISBN 80-7021-634-4. S. 211. Dále jen Rendtorff (2003).
17. Meira Polliack, Marzena Zawanowska, Nehamit Pery: Genesis, Book of III C. Medieval Judaism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1162–1169.
18. Criticisms Of Old Testament History نسخة محفوظة 10 سبتمبر 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين
19. Van Seters 1998، صفحة 5.
20. Michael C. Legaspi: Genesis, Book of IV. Christianity C. Modern Europe and America. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1181–1183.
21. Christoph Uehlinger, Introduction à l'AT, p. 197.
22. Erich Zenger, Christian Frevel: Theorien über die Entstehung des Pentateuch im Wandel der Forschung. In: Einleitung in das Alte Testament (= Kohlhammer Studienbücher Theologie. Band 1,1). 9., aktualisierte Auflage. Hrsg. von Christian Frevel. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 2016, S. 87–135, hier S. 108–110.
23. Erich Zenger, Christian Frevel: Theorien über die Entstehung des Pentateuch im Wandel der Forschung. In: Einleitung in das Alte Testament (= Kohlhammer Studienbücher Theologie. Band 1,1). Kohlhammer, 9. aktualisierte Auflage, hrsg. von Christian Frevel, Stuttgart 2016, S. 87–135, hier S. 108–110.
24. Davies 1998, p. 19. (Davies, G. I. (1998). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". In Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875500-5.)
25. Gooder 2000, pp. 12–14. (Gooder, Paula (2000). The Pentateuch: A Story of Beginnings. T&T Clark. ISBN 978-0-567-08418-7.)
26. Van Seters 1998، صفحة 9.
27. Van Seters 2004, pp. 30–86. (Van Seters, John (2004). The Pentateuch: A Social-science Commentary. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-567-08088-2.)
28. Davies 1998، صفحة 19.
29. Davies 1998, 20쪽. sfn 오류: 대상 없음: CITEREFDavies1998 (도움말)
30. Introduction à l'AT, p. 154-156.
31. Van Seters 1998, p. 14. (Van Seters, John (1998). "The Pentateuch". In Steven L. McKenzie, Matt Patrick Graham (ed.). The Hebrew Bible Today: An Introduction to Critical Issues. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-25652-4.)
32. Davies 1998, p. 37. (Davies, G. I. (1998). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". In Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875500-5.)
33. Davies 1998، صفحة 37.
34. Gmirkin 2006، صفحات 240–241.
35. J.H. Sailhamer (2010): The Meaning of the Pentateuch: Revelation, Composition and Interpretation, InterVarsity Press, pag. 310
36. Sailhamer 2010, p. 301. (Sailhamer, John H. (21 decembrie 2010). Introduction to Old Testament Theology: A Canonical Approach. Zondervan Academic. ISBN 978-0-310-87721-9.)
37. Gmirkin 2006, pp. 240–241. (Gmirkin, Russell E. (2006). Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-0-567-13439-4.)
38. Gmirkin 2006, pp. 240–241. (Gmirkin, Russell E. (2006). Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus. London: Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-0-567-13439-4.)
39. Gmirkin 2006, 240–241쪽. sfn 오류: 대상 없음: CITEREFGmirkin2006 (도움말)
40. Hendel, Ronald; Joosten, Jan (2018-11-20). How Old Is the Hebrew Bible?: A Linguistic, Textual, and Historical Study. Yale University Press. pp. 81–82. ISBN 978-0-300-23488-6.
41. Hornkohl 2024, pp. 37, 136, 201–202. (Hornkohl, Aaron D. (2024-11-11). Diachronic Diversity in Classical Biblical Hebrew. Open Book Publishers. ISBN 978-1-80511-437-6.)
42. Robert Alter, Genesis: Translation and Commentary, p. xlii-xliii.
43. Alter 2004, p. xii. (Alter, Robert (2004). The Five Books of Moses. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-33393-0. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2020.)
44. Schmid 2023. (Schmid, Konrad (2023). "Die Torah als multiautorielle Diskussionsliteratur: Geschichte, Ästhetik und Hermeneutik eines kollaborativen Schreiberprodukts". In Gropper, Stefanie; et al. (eds.). Plurale Autorschaft. Ästhetik der Co-Kreativität in der Vormoderne. Andere Ästhetik – Koordinaten (in German). Vol. 2. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 159–184. doi:10.1515/9783110755763-008.)
45. Ska 2006, pp. 169, 217–218. (Ska, Jean-Louis (2006). Introduction to Reading the Pentateuch. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-1-57506-122-1.)
46. Ska 2006، صفحات 169, 217–218.
47. The Persian Imperial Authorization as Historical Problem and as Biblical Construct: A Plea for Differentiations in the Current Debate (2007)
48. Ska 2006, pp. 217–218. (Ska, Jean-Louis (2006). Introduction to Reading the Pentateuch. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-1-57506-122-1.)
49. Sur l'évolution de la recherche, voir par exemple (en) Marc Zvi Brettler, How to Read the Bible, Jewish Publication Society, 2010, p. 20 et suiv. ou (en) Megan Bishop Moore et Brad E. Kelle, Biblical History and Israel's Past : The Changing Study of the Bible and History, Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2011, p. 57 et suiv.
50. Oxford Bible Commentary. [S.l.]: Oxford University Press. 2001. Cópia arquivada em 12 de maio de 2015
51. The Bible Unearthed, p. 38.
52. Gn 37,25.
53. Barbara Schmitz: Geschichte Israels (= UTB. Band 3547). 3., aktualisierte Auflage. Schöningh, Paderborn 2022, S. 128.
54. The Bible Unearthed, p. 37.
55. Ce point de vue est soutenu par de nombreux chercheurs. Voir notamment (en) Roland de Vaux, Early History of Israel, 1978, p. 223-225 ; (en) John Van Seters, Abraham in History and Tradition, 1975, p. 17 ; (en) Nadav Naʼaman, Canaan in the Second Millennium B.C.E., Eisenbrauns, 2005 (lire en ligne), p. 324-325 ; Juris Zarins, « Camel », dans The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, vol. 1, p. 826 ; (en) Lidar Sapir-Hen et Erez Ben-Yosef, « The Introduction of Domestic Camels to the Southern Levant : Evidence from the Aravah Valley », Tel Aviv, vol. 40, no 2,‎ novembre 2013, p. 277-285 (lire en ligne) ; (en) Mark W. Chavalas, Mesopotamia and the Bible, 2002, p. 280.
56. Schmitz 2022, p. 128. (Schmitz, Barbara (2022). Geschichte Israels. UTB (in German). Vol. 3547 (3rd, updated ed.). Paderborn: Brill Schöningh. ISBN 978-3-8252-5887-0.)
57. Gn 26,1.
58. La Bible dévoilée, p. 68.
59. Richard S. Hess, « Chaldea (Place) », dans The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, vol. 1, p. 886-887.
60. Robert Kugler et Patrick Hartin, An Introduction to the Bible, p. 64.
61. المدخل إلى العهد القديم، د.ق. صمويل يوسف، ص 84
62. (en) Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17, p. 15.
63. The Bible Unearthed, p. 40.
64. La Bible dévoilée, p. 69.
65. Hendel 1992, p. 933. (Hendel, R. S. (1992). "Genesis, Book of". In Freedman, D. N. (ed.). Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary. Vol. 2. Doubleday.)
66. Armin Lange: Pentateuch: Ancient Hebrew Texts. Ancient, Late Ancient, and Early Medieval Manuscript Evidence. In: Armin Lange (Hrsg.): The Textual History of the Bible Online. Brill, 2020, ISSN 2452-4107.
67. Hendel 1992، صفحة 933.
68. Daniel Stökl Ben Ezra: Qumran. Die Texte vom Toten Meer und das antike Judentum. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2016, S. 186.; Sidnie W. Crawford: Genesis in the Dead Sea Scrolls. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements. Band 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 353–373, hier S. 353.
69. Stökl Ben Ezra 2016, p. 186. (Stökl Ben Ezra, Daniel (2016). Qumran. Die Texte vom Toten Meer und das antike Judentum (in German). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-8252-4681-5.)
70. Lange 2020. (Lange, Armin (2020). "Pentateuch: Ancient Hebrew Texts. Ancient, Late Ancient, and Early Medieval Manuscript Evidence.". In Lange, Armin (ed.). The Textual History of the Bible Online. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/2452-4107_thb_COM_0001010000. ISSN 2452-4107.)
71. Ronald Hendel: Pentateuch: Ancient Hebrew Texts. SP and Ancient Texts Close to SP; Genesis. In: Armin Lange (Hrsg.): The Textual History of the Bible Online, Brill 2020, ISSN 2452-4107.
72. Ronald Hendel: Pentateuch: Ancient Hebrew Texts. Masoretic Texts and Ancient Texts Close to MT. In: Armin Lange (Hrsg.): The Textual History of the Bible Online, Brill 2020, ISSN 2452-4107.
73. Hendel 2020b. (Hendel, Ronald (2020). "Pentateuch: Ancient Hebrew Texts. Masoretic Texts and Ancient Texts Close to MT.". In Lange, Armin (ed.). The Textual History of the Bible Online. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/2452-4107_thb_COM_0001030101. ISSN 2452-4107.)
74. Ernst Axel Knauf: Zeitrechnung II. Altes Testament. In: Theologische Realenzyklopädie (TRE). Band 36, de Gruyter, Berlin / New York 2004, ISBN 3-11-017842-7, S. 589–594. Hier S. 593.
75. Christoph Uehlinger, Introduction à l'AT, p. 198.
76. Knauf 2004, p. 593. (Knauf, Ernst Axel (2004). "Zeitrechnung II. Altes Testament". Theologische Realenzyklopädie (in German). Vol. 36. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter. pp. 589–594. ISBN 3-11-017842-7.)
77. Ernst Axel Knauf: Zeitrechnung II. In: Theologische Realenzyklopädie (TRE). Volume 36, de Gruyter, Berlin / New York 2004, ISBN 3-11-017842-7, pp. 589–594.
78. Jan Christian Gertz: Das erste Buch Mose (Genesis). Die Urgeschichte Gen 1–11 (= Das Alte Testament Deutsch. Band 1 neu). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2018, S. 192 und 195. Zur Diskussion vgl. Benjamin Ziemer: Erklärung der Zahlen von Gen 5 aus ihrem kompositionellen Zusammenhang. In: Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft. Band 121 (2009), S. 1–18.
79. Gertz 2018, p. 192. (Gertz, Jan Christian (2018). Das erste Buch Mose (Genesis). Die Urgeschichte Gen 1–11. Das Alte Testament Deutsch (in German). Vol. 1, new edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN 978-3-525-57055-5.)
80. Martin Karrer, Wolfgang Kraus (Hrsg.): Septuaginta Deutsch. Das griechische Alte Testament in deutscher Übersetzung. Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, Stuttgart 2009, S. 3 f. (Genesis, Einleitung). Alle Übersetzungen nach der Septuaginta Deutsch.
81. Karrer & Kraus 2009, pp. 3–4. (Karrer, Martin; Kraus, Wolfgang, eds. (2009). Septuaginta Deutsch. Das griechische Alte Testament in deutscher Übersetzung (in German). Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. ISBN 978-3-438-05122-6.)
82. Martin Rösel: Übersetzung als Vollendung der Auslegung. Studien zur Genesis-Septuaginta. Berlin / New York 1994, S. 241 f.
83. Rösel 1994, pp. 241–242. (Rösel, Martin (1994). Übersetzung als Vollendung der Auslegung. Studien zur Genesis-Septuaginta. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft (in German). Vol. 223. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-014187-7.)
84. Martin Rösel: Übersetzung als Vollendung der Auslegung. Studien zur Genesis-Septuaginta. Berlin / New York 1994, S. 246 f.
85. Martin Rösel: Übersetzung als Vollendung der Auslegung. Studien zur Genesis-Septuaginta. Berlin / New York 1994, S. 252 f.
86. Rösel 1994, pp. 252–253. (Rösel, Martin (1994). Übersetzung als Vollendung der Auslegung. Studien zur Genesis-Septuaginta. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft (in German). Vol. 223. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-014187-7.)
87. Avigdor Shinan: Pentateuch: Primary Translations. Targumim; Targum Onqelos. In: Armin Lange (Hrsg.): The Textual History of the Bible Online, Brill 2020, ISSN 2452-4107.
88. Shinan 2020.
89. Avigdor Shinan: Pentateuch: Primary Translations. Targumim; Palestinian Targumim. In: Armin Lange (Hrsg.): The Textual History of the Bible Online, Brill 2020, ISSN 2452-4107.
90. Shinan 2020a. (Shinan, Avigdor (2020). "Pentateuch: Primary Translations. Targumim; Targum Onqelos.". In Lange, Armin (ed.). The Textual History of the Bible Online. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/2452-4107_thb_COM_0001050100. ISSN 2452-4107.)
91. Hedley Sparks: Jerome as Biblical Scholar. In: P. R. Ackroyd, C. F. Evans (Hrsg.): The Cambridge History of the Bible. Band 1: From the Beginnings to Jerome. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1970, S. 510–541, hier S. 526: The more closely one studies the version from the Hebrew, the more one feels that, despite his theorizings, Jerome in practice translated very much as he happened himself to feel at any particular moment.
92. Sparks 1970, p. 526. (Sparks, Hedley (1970). "Jerome as Biblical Scholar". In Ackroyd, P. R.; Evans, C. F. (eds.). The Cambridge History of the Bible. Vol. 1: From the Beginnings to Jerome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 510–541. ISBN 978-0-521-07051-7.)
93. Matthew Kraus: Pentateuch: Primary Translations. Vulgate. In: Armin Lange (Hrsg.): The Textual History of the Bible Online, Brill 2020, ISSN 2452-4107.
94. Kraus 2020. (Kraus, Matthew (2020). "Pentateuch: Primary Translations. Vulgate.". In Lange, Armin (ed.). The Textual History of the Bible Online. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/2452-4107_thb_COM_0001080000. ISSN 2452-4107.)
95. Van Seters 2004, pp. 113–114. (Van Seters, John (2004). The Pentateuch: A Social-science Commentary. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-567-08088-2.)
96. Van Seters 2004، صفحات 113–114.
97. Whybray 2001, p. 39. (Whybray, R. N. (2001). "Genesis". In Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875500-5.)
98. Whybray 2001، صفحة 39.
99. Ska 2006, p. 169. (Ska, Jean-Louis (2006). Introduction to Reading the Pentateuch. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-1-57506-122-1.)
100. Ska 2006، صفحة 169.
101. Ska (2006), p.169
102. Longman 2005, p. 62. (Longman, Tremper (2005). How to Read Genesis. How to Read Series. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 9780830875603.)
103. Longman 2005، صفحة 62.
104. Hamilton 1990, p. 2. (Hamilton, Victor P (1990). The Book of Genesis: chapters 1–17. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-2521-6.)
105. Schwartz 2016, p. 1. (Schwartz, Sarah (2016). "Narrative Toledot Formulae in Genesis: The Case of Heaven and Earth, Noah, and Isaac". Journal of Hebrew Scriptures. 16: 1–36. doi:10.5508/jhs.2016.v16.a8. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 21, 2020.)
106. Jan Christian Gertz: Das erste Buch Mose (Genesis). Die Urgeschichte Gen 1–11 (= Das Alte Testament Deutsch. Band 1 neu). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2018, S. 6–9.
107. WISEMAN, P. J.: Vznik knihy Genesis. Havířov: JAMI 1993.
108. Wiseman 1985, hlm. 79-80. (Wiseman, P.J. (1985). Wiseman, D.J. (ed.). Ancient Records and the Structure of Genesis: A Case for Literary Unity. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc. ISBN 978-0-8407-7502-3.)
109. Arnold 1998, pp. 17–18. (Arnold, Bill T. (1998). Encountering the Book of Genesis: A Study of Its Content and Issues. Encountering Biblical Studies. Grand Rapids, Michigan, US: Baker Academic. ISBN 9781585585397.)
110. Arnold 1998, pp. 17–18. (Arnold, Bill T. (1998). Encountering the Book of Genesis: A Study of Its Content and Issues. Encountering Biblical Studies. Grand Rapids, Michigan, US: Baker Academic. ISBN 978-1-58558-539-7.)
111. Leithart 2017. (Leithart, Peter (September 5, 2017). "Toledoth and the Structure of Genesis". theopolisinstitute.com. Theopolis Institute. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved March 9, 2024.)
112. Bill T. Arnold: Genesis (= New Cambridge Bible Commentary). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge / New York 2009, S. 126.
113. Bergant 2013, p. xii. (Bergant, Dianne (2013). Genesis: In the Beginning. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-8275-3.)
114. Whybray 2001, p. 41. (Whybray, R. N. (2001). "Genesis". In Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875500-5.)
115. Georg Fischer: Genesis 1–11. Freiburg/Basel/Wien 2018, S. 38.
116. Walsh 2001, p. 112. (Walsh, Jerome T (2001). Style and Structure in Biblical Hebrew Narrative. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-5897-0.)
117. Bergant 2013, p. 45. (Bergant, Dianne (2013). Genesis: In the Beginning. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-8275-3.)
118. Bergant 2013, p. 103. (Bergant, Dianne (2013). Genesis: In the Beginning. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-8275-3.)
119. Erhard Blum: The Jacob Tradition. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 181–211, hier S. 181.
120. Genese 1:11 dans la Bible du Rabbinat.
121. "Strong's Hebrew: 3117. yom". Bible Hub. Retrieved 19 March 2026. Lexical Summary: 1. a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb) / Strong's Exhaustive Concordance: age, always, continually, daily, birth, each, today,
122. Alter, Robert. (2004) The Five Books of Moses. Hew York: W. W. Norton & Company. pg. xii - "Genesis opens with a narrative of origins—Creation and the Garden Story—that is compelling in its archetypal character, its adaptation of myth to monotheistic ends ..."
123. "Genesis 2 Interlinear Bible". Bible Hub. 'êl·leh ṯō·wl·ḏō·wṯ haš·šā·ma·yim wə·hā·'ā·reṣ bə·hib·bā·rə·'ām; bə·yō·wm, 'ă·śō·wṯ Yah·weh 'ĕ·lō·hîm 'e·reṣ wə·šā·mā·yim.
124. Hyers 1984, Chapter 5, p 107
125. Mathews 1996, p. 290. (Mathews, Kenneth A. (1996). The New American Commentary: Genesis 1-11:26 Vol. 1A. Nashville: B&H Publishing Group. ISBN 9780805401011.)
126. The Collegeville Bible commentary. [S.l.: s.n.] Cópia arquivada em 13 de outubro de 2025
127. Äthiopisches Henochbuch 6,2; Philo: De gigantibus 6; Josephus: Antiquitates 1,73.
128. «USCCB - NAB - Genesis 6». usccb.org. Consultado em 27 de novembro de 2010. Cópia arquivada em 9 de julho de 2011
129. Свето писмо на Стариот и на новиот завет (трето издание). Свиндон: Британско и инострано библиско друштво, Скопје: Македонска книга, 1998, стр. 14-18.
130. Alan Dundes; et al. The Flood Myth. [S.l.: s.n.]
131. Baden (2019, p. 14)
132. 1. Mos 6,19
133. 1. Mos 7,2
134. Jan Christian Gertz: Das erste Buch Mose (Genesis). Die Urgeschichte Gen 1–11 (= Das Alte Testament Deutsch. Band 1 neu). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2018, S. 276.
135. Christoph Uehlinger, Introduction à l'AT, p. 202.
136. Jan Christian Gertz: Das erste Buch Mose (Genesis). Die Urgeschichte Gen 1–11 (= Das Alte Testament Deutsch. Band 1 neu). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2018, S. 318–322.
137. Josephus, Jüdische Altertümer, çevirmen: H. Clementz, 1. kitap, bölüm 4, paragraf 2, 3, sayfa 31, 32
138. Jan Christian Gertz: Das erste Buch Mose (Genesis). Die Urgeschichte Gen 1–11 (= Das Alte Testament Deutsch. Band 1 neu). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2018, S. 346 f.
139. Everett Jenkins. The creation: secular, Jewish, Catholic, Protestant, and Muslim perspectives. [S.l.: s.n.] Cópia arquivada em 18 de dezembro de 2024
140. Christoph Uehlinger, Introduction à l'AT, p. 200, 202.
141. Bandstra 2008, p. 78. (Bandstra, Barry L. (2008). Reading the Old Testament. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-495-39105-0.)
142. Bêt ’āv ist die Menschengruppe, die mit Noach in die Arche geht: Noach, seine Frau, seine Söhne und die Frauen seiner Söhne. Diese patriarchale und patrilokale Familie ist auch in den Erzelternerzählungen vorausgesetzt. Vgl. Rainer Kessler: Familie, Sippe, Stamm. In: Walter Dietrich (Hrsg.): Die Welt der Hebräischen Bibel: Umfeld – Inhalte – Grundthemen. 2., erweiterte, überarbeitete Auflage. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 2021, S. 186–200, besonders S. 187 f.
143. Michael David Coogan. The Oxford history of the biblical world. [S.l.: s.n.] Cópia arquivada em 18 de dezembro de 2024
144. Anke Mühling: „Blickt auf Abraham, euren Vater“. Abraham als Identifikationsfigur des Judentums in der Zeit des Exils und des Zweiten Tempels. Göttingen 2011, S. 48 f.; Bill T. Arnold: Genesis. Cambridge / New York 2009, S. 138. Zum Motiv der „Gefährdung der Ahnfrau“ vgl. Anke Mühling: Preisgabeerzählungen. In: Michaela Bauks, Michael Pietsch, Stefan Alkier (Hrsg.): Das wissenschaftliche Bibellexikon im Internet (WiBiLex), Stuttgart April 2009, abgerufen am 10. Juni 2024.
145. Die „Jordangegend“, wörtlich: der „Jordankreis“; der Erzählzusammenhang legt die Region unmittelbar nördlich des Toten Meeres nahe. Vgl. Detlef Jericke: Die Ortsangaben im Buch Genesis. Göttingen 2013, S. 106.
146. Anke Mühling: „Blickt auf Abraham, euren Vater“. Abraham als Identifikationsfigur des Judentums in der Zeit des Exils und des Zweiten Tempels. Göttingen 2011, S. 52–54.
147. Gard Granerød. Abraham and Melchizedek: Scribal Activity of Second Temple Times. [S.l.: s.n.] Cópia arquivada em 18 de dezembro de 2024
148. Brueggemann 2002, p. 61. (Brueggemann, Walter (2002). Reverberations of faith: A Theological Handbook of Old Testament themes. Westminster John Knox. ISBN 978-0-664-22231-4.)
149. Anke Mühling: „Blickt auf Abraham, euren Vater“. Abraham als Identifikationsfigur des Judentums in der Zeit des Exils und des Zweiten Tempels. Göttingen 2011, S. 56 f.
150. Stephen R. Haynes, Steven L. McKenzie. To each its own meaning. [S.l.: s.n.] Cópia arquivada em 18 de dezembro de 2024
151. Matthias Köckert: Die Geschichte der Abrahamüberlieferung. Leiden 2006, S. 121.
152. Anke Mühling: „Blickt auf Abraham, euren Vater“. Abraham als Identifikationsfigur des Judentums in der Zeit des Exils und des Zweiten Tempels. Göttingen 2011, S. 36–39.
153. Bill T. Arnold: Genesis. Cambridge / New York 2009, S. 179 f.
154. Anke Mühling: „Blickt auf Abraham, euren Vater“. Abraham als Identifikationsfigur des Judentums in der Zeit des Exils und des Zweiten Tempels. Göttingen 2011, S. 59–61.
155. Bill T. Arnold: Genesis. Cambridge / New York 2009, S. 183–186.
156. Albert de Pury, Introduction à l'AT, p. 217-218.
157. Edward Noort: Lot's Daughters I Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 16, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2018, ISBN 978-3-11-031333-8, Sp. 1219–1220.
158. Anke Mühling: „Blickt auf Abraham, euren Vater“. Abraham als Identifikationsfigur des Judentums in der Zeit des Exils und des Zweiten Tempels. Göttingen 2011, S. 62–64.
159. Thomas Naumann: Ismael: Israels Selbstwahrnehmung im Kreis der Völker aus der Nachkommenschaft Abrahams (= Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament. Band 151): Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2018, S. 501. Naumann widerspricht ebd. einem Deutungsmuster, nach dem Ismael nach der Geburt Isaaks vom Erzähler nicht mehr gebraucht wird und daher mitsamt seiner Mutter „in der Wüste gewissermaßen ‚entsorgt‘ werden muss.“
160. Thomas Naumann: Ismael: Israels Selbstwahrnehmung im Kreis der Völker aus der Nachkommenschaft Abrahams (= Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament, 151): Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2018, S. 501. Naumann widerspricht ebd. einem Deutungsmuster, nach dem Ismael nach der Geburt Isaaks vom Erzähler nicht mehr gebraucht wird und daher mitsamt seiner Mutter „in der Wüste gewissermaßen ‚entsorgt‘ werden muss.“
161. Ed Noort: Genesis 22: Human Sacrifice and Theology in the Hebrew Bible. In: Ed Noort, Eibert Tigchelaar (Hrsg.): The Sacrifice of Isaac. The Aqedah (Genesis 22) and Its Interpretations (= Themes in Biblical Narrative. Band 4). Brill, Leiden 2002, S. 1–20, hier S. 5 f.
162. Anke Mühling: „Blickt auf Abraham, euren Vater“. Abraham als Identifikationsfigur des Judentums in der Zeit des Exils und des Zweiten Tempels. Göttingen 2011, S. 38; Hanna Liss: Das Buch Bereschit (Genesis). Heidelberg 2019, S. 48.
163. Jack M. Sassoon: The Servant’s Tale: How Rebekah Found a Spouse. In: Journal of Near Eastern Studies. Band 65 (2004), S. 241–265, hier S. 265.
164. Jack M. Sassoon: The Servant’s Tale: How Rebekah Found a Spouse. In: Journal of Near Eastern Studies 65 (2004), S. 241–265, hier S. 265.
165. Matthias Köckert: Die Geschichte der Abrahamüberlieferung. Leiden 2006, S. 120.
166. Matthias Köckert: Die Geschichte der Abrahamüberlieferung. Leiden 2006, S. 125.
167. Erhard Blum: The Jacob Tradition. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 181–211, hier S. 183.
168. Erhard Blum: The Jacob Tradition. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 181–211, hier S. 183 f.
169. Albert de Pury, Introduction à l'AT, p. 219-220.
170. Erhard Blum: The Jacob Tradition. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 181–211, hier S. 184.
171. Albert de Pury, Introduction à l'AT, p. 220.
172. Erhard Blum: The Jacob Tradition. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 181–211, hier S. 185.
173. "The Book of Bereishit (Genesis): Chapter 34". Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved December 12, 2023.
174. "The Book of Bereishit (Genesis): Chapter 34". Jewish Virtual Library. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2024-04-11. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2023-12-12.
175. Erhard Blum: The Jacob Tradition. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 181–211, hier S. 193 f.
176. Jan Christian Gertz: Die nichtpriesterschriftliche Josefsgeschichte. In: Jan Christian Gertz (Hrsg.): Grundinformation Altes Testament. 6., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2019, S. 279–285, hier S. 281.
177. Robert Alter: The Art of Biblical Narrative. Revised and updated. Basic Books, New York 2011, S. 10.
178. Christoph Uehlinger, Introduction à l'AT, p. 248.
179. Richard J. Clifford: Genesis 38: Its Contribution to the Jacob Story. In: The Catholic Biblical Quarterly. Band 66 (2004), S. 519–532, hier S. 532.
180. Christoph Uehlinger, Introduction à l'AT, p. 242-243.
181. Свето писмо на Стариот и на новиот завет (трето издание). Свиндон: Британско и инострано библиско друштво, Скопје: Македонска книга, 1998, стр. 48-55.
182. 1. Moos. 41
183. Walter Dietrich: Joseph/Josephserzählung. In: Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG). 4th edition. Band 4, Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen 2001, Sp. 575–577. The "Basic Amendment" was thus created in the northern kingdom of Israel and was revised after its end in 722 BC in the southern kingdom of Judah.
184. Konrad Schmid: Die Josephsgeschichte im Pentateuch, Berlin /New York 2002, S. 101 f.
185. Свето писмо на Стариот и на новиот завет (трето издание). Свиндон: Британско и инострано библиско друштво, Скопје: Македонска книга, 1998, стр. 55-66.
186. Josvas bog beskriver hvordan Josefs rester bliver begravet i Sikem efter udvandringen fra Ægypten.
187. Karin Schöpflin: Jakob segnet seinen Sohn. Genesis 49,1–28 im Kontext von Josefs- und Vätergeschichte. In: Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft. Band 115 (2003), S. 501–523, besonders S. 521 f.
188. Karin Schöpflin: Jakob segnet seinen Sohn. Genesis 49,1–28 im Kontext von Josefs- und Vätergeschichte. In: Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 115 (2003), S. 501–523, besonders S. 521 f.
189. Damrosch 1987, p. 88. (Damrosch, David (1987). The Narrative Covenant; Transformation of Genre in the Growth of Biblical Literature. United Kingdom: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-061693-8.)
190. Robert Kugler et Patrick Hartin, An Introduction to the Bible, 2009, p. 53.
191. «Génesis - Bíblia Sagrada». capuchinhos.org. Consultado em 28 de outubro de 2010. Cópia arquivada em 7 de setembro de 2019
192. Damrosch 1987, p. 90. (Damrosch, David (1987). The Narrative Covenant; Transformation of Genre in the Growth of Biblical Literature. United Kingdom: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-061693-8.)
193. Damrosch 1987, p. 91. (Damrosch, David (1987). The Narrative Covenant; Transformation of Genre in the Growth of Biblical Literature. United Kingdom: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-061693-8.)
194. The Seven Tablets of Creation. Description of Their Contents., The Babylonian Legends of Creation, by E. A. Wallis Budge, [1921], at sacred-texts.com, 26-5-2013. نسخة محفوظة 7 يوليو 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين
195. Leeming 2004 - "To the extent that this myth was influenced by Mesopotamian concepts, it can be said that it purposely establishes a monotheistic creation as opposed to the Babylonian polytheistic one." "Biblical creation"
196. Encyclopaedia Judaica, p. 445-447, « The Major Themes and Teachings ».
197. عن الإنسان والكون والتطور، مرجع سابق، ص.150
198. La Bible et l'invention de l'histoire, p. 320-323.
199. Creation, Un-creation, Re-creation, p. 12-14.
200. Alter & Kermode 1987, p. 545. (Alter, Robert; Kermode, Frank (1987). The Literary Guide to the Bible. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-87531-1.)
201. Alter & Kermode 1987, pp. 545–546. (Alter, Robert; Kermode, Frank (1987). The Literary Guide to the Bible. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-87531-1.)
202. Harry Orlinski's Notes to the NJPS Torah
203. Pierre Bordreuil et Françoise Briquel-Chatonnet, « Enquête sur la naissance de la Bible », Le Monde de la Bible,‎ hors-série d'automne 2012, p. 43.
204. Clines 1997, p. 30. (Clines, David A (1997). The Theme of the Pentateuch. Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-567-43196-7.)
205. Clines 1997، صفحة 30.
206. Clines (1997), s. 30
207. McKeown 2008, p. 4. (McKeown, James (2008). Genesis. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-2705-0.)
208. McKeown 2008، صفحة 4.
209. McKeown (2008), s. 4
210. Wenham (2003), s. 34
211. Bandstra 2004، صفحات 28–29.
212. Carr 2021, pp. 50–51. (Carr, David M. (2021). The Hebrew Bible: A Contemporary Introduction to the Christian Old Testament and the Jewish Tanakh (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell. ISBN 9781119636670.)
213. Carr 2021، صفحات 50–51.
214. Carr 2021，第50–51頁. (Carr, David M. The Hebrew Bible: A Contemporary Introduction to the Christian Old Testament and the Jewish Tanakh 2nd. Wiley Blackwell. 2021. ISBN 9781119636670.)
215. Steve Moyise: Genesis, Book of II. New Testament. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1153–1156.
216. Encyclopædia Universalis, « Livre de la Genèse », Dictionnaire du Judaïsme (Les Dictionnaires d'Universalis) lire en ligne.
217. Steve Moyise: Genesis, Book of II. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Volume 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, col. 1153–1156.
218. « Il n'y a pas trace de péché originel dans le récit de la Genèse », interview de James Kugel.
219. Paolo Sacchi (trad. Luc Leonas), Les apocryphe de l'Ancien Testament : Une introduction, Cerf, 2014, p. 77.
220. (en) G. W. E. Nickelsburg, « The Bible rewritten and expanded », dans E. Stone (dir.), Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period : Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Sectarian Writings, Philo, Josephus, Assen et Philadelphia, Van Gorcum et Fortress Press, coll. « Compendia Rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum », 1984, p. 106.
221. Sidnie W. Crawford: Genesis in the Dead Sea Scrolls. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements. Band 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 353–373, hier S. 355.
222. Sidnie W. Crawford: Genesis in the Dead Sea Scrolls. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements, 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 353–373, hier S. 355.
223. Gregory E. Sterling: When the Beginning Is the End: The Place of Genesis in the Commentaries of Philo. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements. Band 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 427–446, hier S. 429 f.
224. Christopher T. Begg: Genesis in Josephus. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements. Band 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 301–329, hier S. 306–308.
225. Christopher T. Begg: Genesis in Josephus. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements. Band 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 301–329, hier S. 305 f. und 309.
226. Christopher T. Begg: Genesis in Josephus. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements, 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 301–329, hier S. 306–308.
227. Burton L. Visotzky: Genesis in Rabbinic Interpretation. In: Craig A. Evans et al.: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (= Vetus Testamentum, Supplements. Band 152). Brill, Leiden 2012, S. 579–606, hier S. 582–587; Hanna Liss: Das Buch Bereschit (Genesis). Heidelberg 2019, S. 26.
228. Midrasch Bereschit Rabba 38,13.
229. Burton L. Visotzky, « Genesis in the rabbinic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 582 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
230. Midrasch Bereschit Rabba 38,13 (sefaria.org).
231. Michael Morgenstern: Die große Genesis-Dichtung: Juden und Christen im Gespräch über das erste Buch der Bibel im Midrasch Genesis Rabba (= Encounters between Judaism and Christianity. Band 2). Brill Schöningh, Paderborn 2022, S. 427–429.
232. Michael Morgenstern: Die große Genesis-Dichtung: Juden und Christen im Gespräch über das erste Buch der Bibel im Midrasch Genesis Rabba (= Encounters between Judaism and Christianity, 2). Brill Schöningh, Paderborn 2022, S. 427–429.
233. Colette Sirat: Biblical commentaries and Christian influence: the case of Gersonides. In: Nicholas de Lange (Hrsg.): Hebrew Scholarship and the Medieval World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001, S. 210–223, hier S. 212 f.
234. Gilbert Dahan, Gérard Nahon et Élie Nicolas, Rachi et la culture juive en France du Nord au Moyen Âge, coll. « Revue des études juives », 1997, 405 p. (ISBN 978-90-6831-921-7), p. 138.
235. Meira Polliack: Major Trends in Karaite Biblical Exegesis in the Tenth and Eleventh Centuries. In: Meira Polliack (Hrsg.): Karaite Judaism: A Guide to Its History and Literary Sources (= Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section I: Near and Middle East. Band 73). Brill, Leiden 2003, S. 363–413, besonders S. 409.
236. Meira Polliack, Marzena Zawanowska, Nehamit Pery: Genesis, Book of III C. Medieval Judaism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Vol. 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, col. 1162–1169.
237. Elazar Toitou: Rashi’s Commentary on Genesis 1—6 in the Context of Judeo-Christian Controversy. In: Hebrew Union College Annual 61 (1990), S. 159–183-
238. Avraham Grossman: Joseph Bekhor Shor (1130–1200). In: Magne Sæbø (Hrsg.): Hebrew Bible / Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation. I/2: The Middle Ages. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2015, S. 367–369.
239. jewish virtual library, « Abraham Ibn Ezra ».
240. Amos Funkenstein: Perceptions of Jewish History. University of California Press, Berkeley 1993, S. 110 f.
241. Mordechai Cohen: David Qimhi (Radak). In: Magne Sæbø (Hrsg.): Hebrew Bible / Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation. I/2: The Middle Ages. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2015, S. 396–415, hier S. 409.
242. Michael G. Wechsler: Genesis, Book of III D. Medieval Judaism: Mysticism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1169–1171.
243. Michael G. Wechsler: Genesis, Book of III D. Medieval Judaism: Mysticism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Volume 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, col. 1169–1171.
244. Craig A. Evans: Genesis in the New Testament. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 469–494, hier S. 471–473.
245. พระวรสารนักบุญยอห์น 1:1, พระคริสตธรรมคัมภีร์ ฉบับมาตรฐาน 2011
246. Craig A. Evans: Genesis in the New Testament. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation, Leiden 2012, S. 469–494, hier S. 481.
247. Библия на страницата на Българската Православна Църква» Послание на св. ап. Павла до Римляни
248. Библия на страницата на Българската Православна Църква» Послание на св. ап. Павла до Галатяни
249. Andrew Louth, « The fathers on Genesis », dans The book of Genesis, p. 572-574 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
250. Andrew Louth: The Fathers on Genesis. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 561–578, hier S. 568 f.
251. Edward G. Mathews, Joseph P. Amar, Kathleen McVey: St. Ephrem the Syrian: Selected Prose Works. Catholic University of America Press, Washington 1994, S. 59–63.
252. Andrew Louth: The Fathers on Genesis. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 561–578, hier S. 571 f.
253. Johannes Brachtendorf: Einleitung. In: Johannes Brachtendorf, Volker Henning Drecoll (Hrsg.): Augustinus De Genesi ad litteram: Ein kooperativer Kommentar (= Augustinus – Werk und Wirkung. Band 13). Brill, Leiden 2021, S. 1–42, hier S. 4.
254. Catholic Encyclopedia, « Works of St. Augustine of Hippo »
255. Andrew Louth: The Fathers on Genesis. In: Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, David L. Petersen: The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Leiden 2012, S. 561–578, hier S. 575 f.
256. Charlotte Köckert: Genesis, Book of IV A. Greek and Latin Patristics and Orthodox Churches. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1175–1178.
257. Andrew Louth, « The fathers on Genesis », dans The book of Genesis, p. 576 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
258. Alfons Fürst: Hieronymus. Askese und Wissenschaft in der Spätantike. 2., inhaltlich überarbeitete Auflage. Herder, Freiburg/Basel/Wien 2016, S. 138–144.
259. Alfons Fürst: Hieronymus. Askese und Wissenschaft in der Spätantike. Zweite, inhaltlich überarbeitete Auflage. Herder, Freiburg/Basel/Wien 2016, S. 138–144.
260. Brian Murdoch: Genesis, Book of IV B. Medieval Times and Reformation Era. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1178–1181.
261. Brian Murdoch: Genesis, Book of IV B. Medieval Times and Reformation Era. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Volume 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, col. 1178–1181.
262. Ulrich Asendorf: Lectura in Biblia: Luthers Genesisvorlesung (1535–1545) (= Forschungen zur systematischen und ökumenischen Theologie. Band 87). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1998, S. 69–73.
263. Ulrich Asendorf: Lectura in Biblia: Luthers Genesisvorlesung (1535–1545) (= Forschungen zur systematischen und ökumenischen Theologie, 87). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1998, S. 69–73.
264. Randall C. Zachman: Calvin as commentator on Genesis. In: Donald K. McKim (Hrsg.): Calvin and the Bible. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006, S. 1–29.
265. (en) Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 612 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
266. (en) Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 607-608 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
267. Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 615 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
268. (en) Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 616 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
269. (en) Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 617-620 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
270. คัมภีร์อัลกุรอาน ฉบับภาษาไทย ฮูด 11:40-43
271. Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 620-623 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
272. หนังสือปฐมกาล 22:1-11, พระคริสตธรรมคัมภีร์ ฉบับมาตรฐาน 2011
273. (en) Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 623 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
274. (en) Carol Bakhos, « Genesis, the Qur'an and islamic interpretation », dans The book of Genesis, p. 624-625 (Evans, Lohr et Petersen 2012).
275. Hanna Liss: Tanach. Lehrbuch der jüdischen Bibel. Heidelberg 2019, S. 29.
276. Hanna Liss: Tanach. Lehrbuch der jüdischen Bibel. Heidelberg 2019, S. 62.
277. Chasan Bereschit: Gen 1,1–2,3. Am darauffolgenden Schabbat wird die ganze Parascha Bereschit gelesen.
278. Sefarim, « Pentateuque », « Genèse », liste des parashiyot.
279. Hanna Liss: Tanach. Lehrbuch der jüdischen Bibel. Heidelberg 2019, S. 47 und 468.
280. Hanna Liss: Tanach. Lehrbuch der jüdischen Bibel. Heidelberg 2019, S. 47.
281. Barry Dov Walfish: Genesis, Book of III F. Jewish Liturgy. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1174–1175.
282. Barry Dov Walfish: Genesis, Book of III F. Jewish Liturgy. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Vol. 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, cols. 1174–1175.
283. Hermann Gunkel: Genesis, übersetzt und erklärt (= Göttinger Handkommentar zum Alten Testament. 1. Abt., Band 1). 5. Auflage. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1922, S. LXXXI (Scan – Internet Archive).
284. Hermann Gunkel: Genesis, übersetzt und erklärt (= Göttinger Handkommentar zum Alten Testament. 1. Abt., Band 1). 5. Auflage. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1922, S. VII (Scan – Internet Archive).
285. Hermann Gunkel: Genesis, übersetzt und erklärt (= Göttinger Handkommentar zum Alten Testament). 5. Auflage. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1922, S. VII.
286. Vgl. zu den verschiedenen Auflagen von Gunkels Genesiskommentar ab 1901: Werner Klatt: Hermann Gunkel: Zu seiner Theologie der Religionsgeschichte und zur Entstehung der formgeschichtlichen Methode (= Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments. Band 100). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1969, S. 104–166 (Die Genesis 1901 – das zweite Hauptwerk).
287. Gerhard von Rad: Das erste Buch Mose. Genesis Kapitel 1–12,9 (= Das Alte Testament Deutsch. Band 2). 3. Auflage. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1953, S. 28.
288. Vgl. zu Westermanns Kommentar: Rainer Albertz: Das theologische Vermächtnis des Genesis-Kommentars von Claus Westermann. In: Manfred Oeming (Hrsg.): Claus Westermann: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (= Beiträge zum Verstehen der Bibel. Band 2). LIT, Münster 2003, S. 79–93.
289. Hanna Liss: Jüdische Bibelauslegung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2022, S. 331 f.
290. Was the Documentary Hypothesis Tainted by Wellhausen’s Antisemitism? In: TheTorah.com. Abgerufen am 6. Juni 2023.
291. Hanna Liss: Jüdische Bibelauslegung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2022, S. 314.
292. Hanna Liss: Jüdische Bibelauslegung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2022, S. 333–336.
293. Gerhard Bergner: Um der Sache willen. Karl Barths Schriftauslegung in der Kirchlichen Dogmatik. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2015, S. 162–218, zur Metapher „Weltenhaus“ S. 190. Barths Exegese wirkte ihrerseits auf die Bibelwissenschaften zurück.
294. Rachel Friedman: Genesis, Book of, III D. Modern Judaism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1171–1174. Vgl. zu neueren Entwicklung der Tanach-Exegese und ihrer akademischen Verortung: Hanna Liss: Jüdische Bibelauslegung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2022, S. 397–408.
295. Rachel Friedman: Genesis, Book of, III D. Modern Judaism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Volume 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, cols. 1171–1174. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2022, pp. 397–408.
296. Vgl. Franz Annen: Der biblische Aufbruch in der katholischen Kirche und das Konzil. In: Manfred Belok, Ulrich Kropač (Hrsg.): Volk Gottes im Aufbruch: 40 Jahre II. Vatikanisches Konzil. TVZ, Zürich 2005, S. 14–42, besonders S. 19–24: Die Situation der katholischen Bibelwissenschaft zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts.
297. Vgl. die Rezensionen von Thomas Hieke in: The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 68 (2006), S. 525–527 und Markus Witte in: Theologische Zeitschrift 65 (2009), S. 366–368 (Online). نسخة محفوظة 2023-11-08 على موقع واي باك مشين
298. "Genealogies and Biblical Chronology". www.perspectivedigest.org. Retrieved 2026-04-11.
299. (en) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, « Creationism ».
300. Christoph Berner: Chronology II A. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and Second Temple Judaism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 5, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2012, ISBN 978-3-11-018373-3, Sp. 241–250. Hier S. 241.
301. Christoph Berner: Chronology II A. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and Second Temple Judaism. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Volume 5, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2012, ISBN 978-3-11-018373-3, cols. 241–250.
302. "About the Hebrew Calendar | Yale University Library". web.library.yale.edu. Retrieved 2026-04-11.
303. "The Byzantine Calendar | Melkite". melkite.org. Retrieved 2026-04-11.
304. Gohau 1990, pp. 47–51. (Gohau, Gabriel (1990). A History of Geology. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-1666-0.)
305. Gohau 1990，第47–51頁. (Gohau, Gabriel. A History of Geology. Rutgers University Press. 1990. ISBN 978-0-8135-1666-0.)
306. Maryanne Cline Horowitz (2005). New Dictionary of the History of Ideas. 2. [S.l.: s.n.] O criacionismo, em um sentido geral, refere-se à teoria de que Deus fez o mundo sozinho, por meios miraculosos, do nada. Mais especificamente, na América atual, o criacionismo é a teoria de que a Bíblia, em particular os primeiros capítulos do Gênese, é um guia literalmente verdadeiro da história do universo e da história da vida aqui na Terra, inclusive de nós seres humanos.
307. Bernard Lecomte, Dictionnaire amoureux des Papes, Place des éditeurs, 2016, 425 p. (ISBN 978-2-259-24956-0, lire en ligne), pt147.
308. Steven Engler (junho de 2007). «Tipos de Criacionismos Cristãos». www.pucsp.br/rever/rv2_2007/t_engler.pdf. Revista de Estudos da Religião: 83-107. ISSN 1677-1222 | //www.worldcat.org/issn/1677-1222
309. «Entrevista com John F. Haught: Uma teologia da evolução precisa mostrar que a fé bíblica não contradiz o caráter evolutivo do mundo». Consultado em 20 de julho de 2010 [ligação inativa]
310. عن الإنسان والكون والتطور، مرجع سابق، ص.133
311. عن الإنسان والكون والتطور، مرجع سابق، ص.156
312. Creation Evidence Museum Online - Proof that God had a design Creation Model Session 2
313. Hugh Ross, Navigating Genesis: A Scientist’s Journey through Genesis 1–11 (Covina, CA: RTB Press, 2014), 223–24.
314. Pagels, Elaine. "The Moral Foundation of America." The Atlantic. 9 October 2025. 4 January 2026.
315. Ljubomir Milanović: Genesis, Book of VII. Visual Arts. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1188–1193.
316. Daniel Poirion, Encyclopædia Universalis (lire en ligne), « JEU, genre dramatique ».
317. Pagels, Elaine. "The Moral Foundation of America." Atlantic, 2025, v. 336, n. 5. P. 96. 9 October 2025.
318. Musée du Vatican, La Création d'Adam.
319. Anthony Swindell: Adam and Eve, Story of V. Literature. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 1, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2009, ISBN 978-3-11-018355-9, Sp. 352–356.
320. François-René de Chateaubriand, Œuvres de Chateaubriand : Le paradis perdu, vol. 14, Legrand, Troussel et Pomey (lire en ligne), p. 6.
321. Anthony Swindell: Cain and Abel, Story of VI. Literature. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 4, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2012, ISBN 978-3-11-018372-6, Sp. 757–760.
322. Uwe Stolzmann: Abrechnung eines weisen Erzählers. In: Deutschlandfunk Kultur. 16. August 2011, abgerufen am 10. Juni 2024.
323. Jan Rohls: Die Theologie von Thomas Manns „Joseph und seine Brüder“. In: Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte. Band 19 (2012), S. 72–103, besonders S. 98 f.
324. Christina Roetz: Du lieber Himmel, ein Comic! In: Zeit Online. 10. Dezember 2009, abgerufen am 29. Mai 2023.
325. (en) « Best-sellers », The New York Times (consulté en avril 2022).
326. Nils Holger Petersen: Genesis, Book of VIII. Music. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1193–1195.
327. (en) Mark Roncace et Patrick Gray, Teaching the Bible Through Popular Culture and the Arts, 2007, p. 53.
328. Claude Savart, Jean Noël Aletti, Le Monde contemporain et la Bible, 1985, p. 252.
329. Genesis suite (1945).
330. Nils Holger Petersen: Genesis, Book of IX. Film. In: Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (EBR). Band 9, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2014, ISBN 978-3-11-018377-1, Sp. 1195–1197.
331. « La bible (1966) - Trivia ».
332. «The Life of Genesis» (PDF). Princeton University Press. Besøkt 20. april 2017.