Egyptian hieroglyphs

Etymology and names

The English word hieroglyph derives from the ancient Greek adjective hieroglyphikos (ἱερογλυφικός).^[7][8] This Greek term is a compound formed from hieros (ἱερός), meaning 'sacred', and glyphein (γλύφειν) or glypho (γλύφω), meaning 'to carve' or 'to engrave'.^{[3][7][9][10]} During the Greco-Roman period, the noun hieroglyphos (ἱερόγλυφος) denoted a carver or sculptor of hieroglyphs rather than the characters themselves.^[7][11] The signs on monuments, stelae, temples, and tombs were designated collectively as ta hieroglyphika grammata (τὰ ἱερογλυφικὰ γράμματα), translating to 'the sacred engraved letters'.^[3][12][13] In the English language, the word hieroglyph was first attested as a noun around 1590, shortened from the earlier adjectival substantive hieroglyphic recorded in the 1580s.^[14]

The Greek phrase was an interpretive loan translation of the indigenous ancient Egyptian designation for the script: mdw.w-nṯr (often conventionalized in transcription as medu netjer), meaning 'words of god' or 'divine words'.^[7][12] This indigenous name reflected the religious belief that writing was of heavenly origin, bestowed upon humanity by Thoth, the god of wisdom, knowledge, and reckoning.^[15] Variants of this title included zẖꜣ n.j mdw.w nṯr, translated as 'writing of the divine words'.^[16] By extension, modern usage applies the term hieroglyphic to other pictographic and logographic writing systems developed in the ancient world, such as Anatolian (Luwian), Cretan, and Maya glyphs, although sinograms and cuneiform are categorized within the broader classification of logograms.^[17]

Origins and early development

Hieroglyphic signs appear to have evolved from the prehistoric representational traditions of the Nile Valley. Painted motifs on Gerzean pottery from the Naqada II period (c. 3500–3200 BC) display symbols and geometric configurations that anticipated later hieroglyphic forms.^[18][19] For over a century following excavations at Hierakonpolis (ancient Nekhen, modern Kawm al-Ahmar) in the 1890s, the ceremonial Narmer Palette, dated to approximately 3200–3100 BC, was widely cited as the oldest surviving evidence of Egyptian hieroglyphic writing.^[20][21]

Archaeological discoveries in 1986 and 1998 by the German Archaeological Institute led by Günter Dreyer challenged earlier evolutionary models.^[20][22][23] Excavations in the predynastic cemetery of Umm el-Qa'ab at Abydos uncovered the royal tomb U-j, belonging to a predynastic ruler known as Scorpion I, carbon-dated between 3400 and 3200 BC.^{[20][22][24][25]} Within the tomb were approximately three hundred small perforated clay and bone labels, along with ceramic vessels inscribed with incised or ink-painted proto-hieroglyphic characters.^[20][22] These labels probably served to identify goods and indicate their value..^[22][26] Monumental rock carvings discovered at El Kab dating to approximately 5,200 years ago indicate that large-scale monumental writing developed alongside portable tags.^[27]

A long-standing debate among linguists and historians concerns whether Egyptian writing originated independently or under the stimulus of Mesopotamian cuneiform, which emerged in southern Sumer during the late fourth millennium BC.^{[28][29][30][31]} Proponents of cultural diffusion, such as Geoffrey Sampson, argued that hieroglyphs appeared shortly after Sumerian cuneiform and were invented under its influence, suggesting that the general concept of encoding speech into visual symbols was conveyed from Mesopotamia to the Nile.^[28][32] Diffusionists noted that Mesopotamian script evolved gradually across millennia from clay accounting tokens dating to 8000 BC, whereas mature Egyptian hieroglyphs appeared in archaeological strata with apparent suddenness.^[28][33]

Conversely, discoveries at Abydos dated to c. 3400 BC demonstrate that Egyptian proto-writing was contemporary with, or potentially antecedent to, the earliest known Mesopotamian administrative tablets from Uruk.^[23][25] Scholars such as James P. Allen, Rosalie David, and Gamal Mokhtar emphasize that direct evidence for the transmission of writing between the two civilizations is absent.^{[23][29][34][35]} While Mesopotamia utilized abstract impressed wedges on wet clay tablets, Egyptian writing maintained pictorial fidelity to indigenous Nilotic fauna, flora, landscapes, and tools.^[34][35][36] Rosalie David argued that if Egypt did adopt the idea of writing from elsewhere, presumably only the concept was taken over, since the forms of the hieroglyphs are entirely Egyptian in origin; Gamal Mokhtar argued that a purely Nilotic, and hence African, origin of the script probably reflects the reality.^[34][35][36]

Early inscriptions from Dynasty 0 and the First Dynasty consisted largely of short titular labels, proper names, and commemorative tags. The earliest known grammatically complete sentence in the Egyptian language dates from the Second Dynasty, approximately 2690–2650 BC.^[26][37] Discovered on a seal impression from Peribsen's tomb, the inscription reads: 'He of Ombos has joined the Two Lands for his son, the Dual King Peribsen'..^[37][38] By the Third Dynasty under Djoser (c. 2700 BC) and continuing into the Old Kingdom, the script had stabilized into a full writing system utilized on stone monuments, mortuary temples, and pyramid interiors.^[3][39]

Evolution and derivative scripts

Throughout Egyptian history, hieroglyphic writing coexisted with more cursive derivative scripts tailored to everyday recording needs.^[6][40] In temples, on royal monuments and in tombs, signs were carved into stone in great detail and then painted, while the quickest way to write hieroglyphs was in cursive form..^[40][41] For administrative bookkeeping, taxation accounts, letters, and literary works, scribes required rapid writing media.^[40] Over time, Egyptian script bifurcated into distinct branches: formal monumental hieroglyphs, cursive hieroglyphs, Hieratic, Demotic, and ultimately Coptic.^[40]

Linear hieroglyphs

Linear or cursive hieroglyphs represented an intermediate script form developed toward the close of the Old Kingdom.^[40] Unlike monumental glyphs carved in high relief with inner contours, linear hieroglyphs were drawn with a brush or reed pen using simplified, fluid strokes.^[41] They retained the detailed figurative character of monumental carvings so that individual objects remained recognizable, yet the execution required far less time.^[41] Linear hieroglyphs were used for sacred literature penned on wood and papyrus, prominent on Middle Kingdom coffins (the Coffin Texts) and funerary scrolls of the New Kingdom, including copies of the Book of the Dead, such as the Papyrus of Ani.^[6][41] During the Twentieth Dynasty and the Third Intermediate Period, linear hieroglyphs were largely superseded by Hieratic for mortuary manuscripts.^[41]

Hieratic script

Hieratic was faster to write than hieroglyphs, and the oldest surviving manuscript in Hieratic is the Abusir papyri..^[42] It formed a cursive adaptation designed for quick writing using a rush pen and ink on papyrus rolls, limestone ostraca, pottery fragments, and wooden tablets.^[40] In Hieratic, glyphs flowed together into ligatures, progressively abstracting the pictorial prototypes into fluid, stylized strokes where original figures became difficult for non-specialists to recognize.

. Hieratic served as the primary everyday script for state administration, legal transactions, medical compendia, and literary texts through the Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms.^[40]

Demotic script

Around 650 BC, during the Saite Period (Twenty-sixth Dynasty), scribes developed Demotic (from the Greek demotikos, 'popular' or 'of the people'), known in ancient Egyptian as sekt shat ('document writing').^[43] Demotic was a simplified form of hieroglyphic writing..^[43]

Demotic served as a business script, used mostly on papyrus, and Egyptians wrote texts on everyday subjects such as letters and receipts in Hieratic and Demotic..^[40][43][44]

Coptic alphabet and external lineage

Coptic represents the final stage of the Egyptian language and its writing..^[45] Coptic used the Greek alphabet supplemented by seven Demotic characters to represent sounds not found in Greek..^[45] Although dying out as a spoken vernacular by the seventeenth century in favor of Arabic, Coptic remains in liturgical use within the Coptic Orthodox Church.

Egyptian hieroglyphs exerted an enduring influence on human history through their role in the birth of the alphabet.^[6][46] During the Middle Bronze Age (c. nineteenth to eighteenth centuries BC), Semitic workers and miners in the Sinai peninsula adapted approximately thirty Egyptian hieroglyphic characters to record their West Semitic language acrophonically, creating the Proto-Sinaitic script.^[6][46] This system gave rise to the Phoenician consonant alphabet.^[6][46] Through Phoenician's daughter scripts, Greek and Aramaic, Egyptian hieroglyphs became the ultimate ancestor of the majority of writing systems across the modern world, including the Latin, Cyrillic, Arabic, Hebrew, and Brahmic scripts.^[6][46][47] Egyptian hieroglyphs were also borrowed into the Meroitic alphabet.^[48]

Decline and late survival

Hieroglyphs continued to be used under Persian rule in the sixth and fifth centuries BC and in the Ptolemaic and Roman periods that followed Alexander the Great's conquest of Egypt.^[49] Under the Ptolemies and later the Romans and Byzantines, Greek became the language of administration. Egyptian remained in use only as the spoken language of the native population. Around 700 to 800 hieroglyphic signs are known from the earlier periods, and by the Greco-Roman period there were more than 5,000, or about 7,000 by one count.^[2][50] Some have suggested that the late script became more complex, at least in part, as a response to the changed political situation, and that hieroglyphs may have functioned as a way to distinguish 'true Egyptians' from some of the foreign conquerors.^[49] Greek and Roman writers came to imagine hieroglyphs as an allegorical, even magical, system transmitting secret, mystical knowledge.^[49]

As Christianity expanded across Egypt in the third and fourth centuries AD, the older polytheistic religion was actively suppressed.^[51] Everything connected with the old Egyptian gods was considered pagan and therefore forbidden, and Christians adopted the Greek alphabet.^[51] In 391 AD, the Roman Emperor Theodosius I ordered the closure and demolition of all non-Christian pagan sanctuaries across the empire.^[49][52][53] Monumental carving ceased abruptly across the Nile Valley.^[49][52]

The final dated hieroglyphic inscription was carved on August 24, 394 AD, on the Gateway of Hadrian in the temple precinct of Isis on the island of Philae in southern Egypt.^{[3][52][54][55]} Designated as the Graffito of Esmet-Akhom (or Philae 436), the text consists of an invocation to the Nubian god Mandulis inscribed by Esmet-Akhom, a prophet of Isis, accompanied by a carved depiction of a ruler.^[52][54][56] During the fifth century, the permanent closing of pagan temples across Roman Egypt led to the loss of fluent readers and writers of hieroglyphs.^[57] In the sixth century, the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I completed the closure of the last surviving temples at Philae, dispersing the remnants of the ancient priesthood.^[58]

History of decipherment

For nearly fourteen centuries, the ability to read ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs was lost.^[57][59] The earliest treatise on the script to reach Europe was the Hieroglyphica, attributed to an author named Horapollo, composed in the late fifth century AD.^[49] Horapollo offered symbolic explanations for roughly two hundred signs.^[49] Some of its explanations were correct, such as the goose hieroglyph (zꜣ) representing the word for 'son'.^[49] The text of the Hieroglyphica was found in 1419, which aroused interest in hieroglyphs in Europe.^{[60][61][62][63]} The Hieroglyphica influenced Renaissance symbolism, in particular Andrea Alciato's emblem book Emblemata and Francesco Colonna's Hypnerotomachia Poliphili (1499).

Early scholars tried to read the texts carved on Egyptian obelisks brought to Rome, and in the seventeenth century Athanasius Kircher offered an explanation of the text on one of them.^[64] Kircher correctly recognized that the Coptic language was the direct descendant of ancient Egyptian and contained the linguistic key to the past.^[49] However, blinded by the conviction that the characters encoded deep Neoplatonic and Hermetic mysteries, his translations were entirely fanciful.^[49][64] For example, a simple royal titular cartouche of Pharaoh Apries of the Twenty-sixth Dynasty on a Roman obelisk was interpreted by Kircher as an elaborate mystical formula calling down divine generative forces against Typhon to safeguard the fertility of the Nile.^[64] Other European scholars, such as Johannes Goropius Becanus in the sixteenth century, Nicolas Fréret, and Bishop William Warburton (who posited that the script contained an alphabet), advanced speculative hypotheses without verifiable results.^[65]

Knowledge of the hieroglyphs had been lost in the medieval period, but early attempts at decipherment were made by Dhul-Nun al-Misri in the ninth century and pseudo-Ibn Wahshiyya in the tenth.^[66][67][68] During the ninth and tenth centuries, Arabic alchemists, cryptographers, and historians examined pharaonic inscriptions found on temples, ruins, and tombs.^[67][68][69] Figures such as the alchemist Jabir ibn Hayyan (in Hall al-Rumuz wa-Mafatih al-Kunuz and Al-Hasil), the Egyptian Sufi mystic Dhul-Nun al-Misri (who resided in Akhmim), Ayyub ibn Maslama (who accompanied Abbasid Caliph al-Ma'mun to Egypt), Ibn al-Durayhim, and Abu Ya'qub Ishaq al-Kindi examined ancient scripts.^[66] Scholars like Ibn al-Fatik noted that Pythagoras had recognized three distinct Egyptian scripts: popular (Demotic), priestly (Hieratic), and royal (hieroglyphs).

One Arabic study of the script was made by the Iraqi scholar Ahmad ibn Wahshiyya in his work Kitab Shawq al-Mustaham fi Ma'rifat Rumuz al-Aqlam ('The Longing of the Desirous to Understand the Symbols of Scripts'), completed in 861 AD.^{[67][68][69][70]} Using Coptic for comparison, Ibn Wahshiyya recognized that hieroglyphs were not exclusively ideographic but had a significant phonetic component; he attempted to interpret several dozen signs and some groups of signs, and correctly assigned some individual sound values.^[67][68][69] In 1806, Austrian orientalist Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall published an English translation of Ibn Wahshiyya's treatise in London, sixteen years prior to Jean-François Champollion's celebrated publication.^[68][70]

The decisive turning point in decipherment occurred in mid-July 1799 during Napoleon's invasion of Egypt, when French engineering officer Pierre-François Bouchard discovered the Rosetta Stone during fortification works at Fort Julien near the port city of Rashid (Rosetta).^[71] The French ceded the stone to the British military authorities in 1801 under the Treaty of Capitulation. It measures 113 cm high, 75 cm wide and 27.5 cm thick, and it carries a decree issued around 196 BC by priests gathered at Memphis to thank King Ptolemy V Epiphanes. The stela presented three parallel writing scripts: 14 lines of formal monumental hieroglyphs at the top, 32 lines of administrative Demotic in the center, and 54 lines of ancient Greek at the bottom.^[72]

European scholars then began a race to be the one who solved the riddle of the hieroglyphs.^[73] In 1802, the French orientalist Silvestre de Sacy worked on the Demotic text of the stone. De Sacy's Swedish pupil, Johan David Åkerblad, made substantial progress that same year by constructing a 29-letter Demotic alphabet from proper names, though he erroneously assumed Demotic was entirely alphabetic.^[71][73] In 1814, the English physicist Thomas Young made further progress in understanding the Demotic text and recognized the relationship between Demotic and hieroglyphs.^[73][74] Young deduced that oval loops known as cartouches enclosed royal names. From the names written inside cartouches, Young was able to identify some phonetic hieroglyphic signs.^[73]

The complete breakthrough was achieved by French philologist Jean-François Champollion.^[71][75] Having mastered Coptic, Hebrew, Arabic, Persian, Syriac, Sanskrit, and ancient Greek in his youth, Champollion matched the phonetic characters in the cartouches of Ptolemy and Cleopatra (from the Bankes Obelisk).^[75] By comparing further known royal names, especially the names of Roman emperors, Champollion worked out the sound values of many hieroglyphs.^[76] On September 14, 1822, upon receiving copies of reliefs from the Abu Simbel temples and reading the native pharaonic cartouches of Ramesses and Thutmose using Coptic root words (such as Coptic Ra for 'sun', m-s for 'child' or 'fashion', and Thoth for the ibis god), Champollion realized that phonetic spelling was not an exceptional Greco-Roman innovation but the fundamental basis of the Egyptian script across all historical eras. He ran to his brother Jacques-Joseph, who had helped him in his long search, cried out 'Je tiens l'affaire!' ('I've got it!'), and then collapsed from the effort.

On September 27, 1822, Champollion read his historic paper to the Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres in Paris, published in his Lettre à M. Dacier, announcing that Egyptian hieroglyphic writing was 'a complex system, a script at once figurative, symbolic, and phonetic, in one and the same text, one and the same sentence, and, I might even say, in one and the same word'.^{[3][77][78][79][80]} Champollion, however, initially believed that phonetic signs represented only single consonants.^[76][81] In 1837, German philologist Karl Richard Lepsius published his Lettre à M. Rosellini, proving the existence of multiconsonantal signs (biliterals and triliterals) and phonetic complements, thereby perfecting the linguistic model of Egyptian grammar.^[76][81] In the twentieth century, the work of linguists such as Sir Alan Gardiner and Hans Jakob Polotsky gave a better understanding of Egyptian grammar and its verbal system.

Writing system and sign types

Visually, ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic characters were figurative representations of tangible entities from the physical and cosmological universe.^[3] The Egyptians drew the hieroglyphs from their surroundings, depicting everyday objects, animals, plants, parts of the body, humans and gods. Despite this pictorial realism, the script functioned primarily as a phonetic and linguistic system.^[2][3] Scribes operated with three complementary classes of signs: phonograms (conveying speech sounds), logograms or ideograms (signifying whole words or concrete ideas), and determinatives or semagrams (unpronounced conceptual classifiers appended to word endings).^{[2][3][82][83]}

Visual organization and quadrats

Hieroglyphic writing had no dividers between words or sentences, such as punctuation marks..^[84] Instead, scribes organized individual signs into virtual rectangular or square units known as quadrats (French: cadrat).^[84] Within each quadrat, characters were grouped harmoniously based on size and proportion: tall, vertical glyphs stood alone or flanked shorter elements; flat, horizontal signs were stacked above or below one another; and small, compact glyphs occupied quarters of the block.^[85] Scribes sought to arrange the signs symmetrically and without gaps..^[84][85]

The reading sequence within an individual quadrat operated from top to bottom and from front to back, with superior signs taking absolute precedence over lower signs.^[86] For example, in the Middle Kingdom orthography of the verb form sḥtp.n=f ('he satisfied' or 'he pacified'), the constituent signs were laid out in a compact sequence of blocks: the upper horizontal folded-cloth (s) and door-bolt (ḥ) stood over the offering table (ḥtp), followed by the uniliterals t, p, the water wave (n), and the horned viper (f). Readers processed upper rows before lower rows within the same block.^[86]

Directionality of writing

Hieroglyphic texts possessed graphic flexibility, inscribed either in horizontal lines or in vertical columns.^[85][86][87] Words could proceed horizontally from right to left or from left to right, though right-to-left was the standard and preferred cultural direction (accounting for roughly 96 percent of surviving monumental texts, as evidenced in the Pyramid Texts).^[85][86] Modern academic editions generally normalize Egyptian texts into left-to-right rows for typographical convenience.^[86][87]

Determining the correct reading direction of any hieroglyphic passage is straightforward: asymmetrical characters depicting animate beings (humans, quadrupeds, birds, reptiles, and deities) face directly toward the beginning of the text, looking 'into' the onset of the sentence.^[85][86] If a human figure or eagle faces to the left, the inscription reads from left to right; if facing to the right, it reads from right to left.^[85][86] In architectural spaces such as doorways, pylons, and royal stelae, inscriptions were designed symmetrically: texts on opposing door jambs faced inward toward the central axis, allowing glyphs on one side to read from left to right and on the other from right to left.^[85] In rare ceremonial contexts, inscriptions were written in boustrophedon (alternating direction row by row like an ox plowing a field).^[88] On inner coffin walls and in certain manuscripts of the Book of the Dead, scribes occasionally employed 'retrograde' writing, in which the signs faced toward the end of the text rather than its beginning, a practice that may have had religious reasons, such as the Book of the Dead being regarded as texts from an 'opposite world'.^[85][88]

Phonetic reading (Phonograms)

Phonograms were characters utilized strictly for their phonetic sound values, detached from the physical objects they depicted, operating on the rebus principle.^[89][90] Because the Egyptian script functioned as an abjad, vowels were not recorded in standard orthography, only consonants and semi-vowels (/w/ and /j/).^[89][91] Modern Egyptology inserts an auxiliary short 'e' between consonants in oral pronunciation and conventionalizes ꜣ and ꜥ as 'a', j as 'i', and w as 'u' to facilitate communication (for example, reading nfr as nefer), though these conventions do not reflect ancient spoken vowels.^[89]

The core phonological inventory consisted of twenty-four uniliteral signs (single-consonant characters) forming an 'alphabet':^[92][93]

1. Ꜣ (Gardiner G1, Egyptian vulture): glottal stop /ʔ/, historically a liquid uvular /ʀ/ or /l/, conventionally vocalized as a.^[92][93][94] 2. j or ỉ (Gardiner M17, flowering reed): palatal approximant /j/, glottal stop /ʔ/, conventionalized as i.^[92] 3. y or jj (Gardiner M17A or two diagonal strokes Z4): palatal approximant /j/, conventionalized as y or i.^[92] 4. ꜥ (Gardiner D36, forearm): voiced pharyngeal fricative /ʕ/, historically voiced dental /d/, conventionalized as a.^[92][94] 5. w (Gardiner G43, quail chick, or hieratic abbreviation Z7): voiced labio-velar approximant /w/, vocalized as u or w.^[92] 6. b (Gardiner D58, foot and lower leg): voiced bilabial plosive /b/.^[92] 7. p (Gardiner Q3, reed mat or stool): voiceless bilabial plosive /p/ or aspirated /pʰ/.^[92] 8. f (Gardiner I9, horned viper): voiceless labiodental fricative /f/.^[92][94] 9. m (Gardiner G17, owl, or rib Aa15): voiced bilabial nasal /m/.^[92] 10. n (Gardiner N35, water ripple, or red crown S3): voiced alveolar nasal /n/.^[92] 11. r (Gardiner D21, mouth): alveolar liquid /ɾ/ or /r/, occasionally lateral /l/.^[92] 12. h (Gardiner O4, reed hut or courtyard): voiceless glottal fricative /h/.^[92] 13. ḥ (Gardiner V28, twisted flax wick): voiceless pharyngeal fricative /ħ/.^[92] 14. ḫ (Gardiner Aa1, placenta, sieve, or cord ball): voiceless velar fricative /x/ (German ch in Dach).^[92] 15. ẖ (Gardiner F32, animal belly with tail): voiceless palatal fricative /ç/ (German ch in ich).^[92] 16. z (Gardiner O34, door bolt): voiced alveolar fricative /z/, which merged into /s/ during the Middle Kingdom.^[92] 17. s or ś (Gardiner S29, folded cloth): voiceless alveolar fricative /s/.^[92] 18. š (Gardiner N37, water pool): voiceless postalveolar fricative /ʃ/ (English sh).^[92] 19. q or ḳ (Gardiner N29, hill slope): voiceless uvular plosive /q/ or ejective /qʼ/.^[92] 20. k (Gardiner V31, basket with handle): voiceless velar plosive /k/ or aspirated /kʰ/.^[92] 21. g (Gardiner W11, jar stand, or linen bag V32): voiced velar plosive /ɡ/ or ejective /kʼ/.^[92] 22. t (Gardiner X1, bread loaf): voiceless dental plosive /t/ or aspirated /tʰ/.^[92] 23. ṯ (Gardiner V13, animal tether): palatalized dental plosive /c/ or affricate /t͡ʃ/ (English ch).^[92] 24. d (Gardiner D46, hand): voiced dental plosive /d/ or ejective /tʼ/.^[92] 25. ḏ (Gardiner I10, cobra): palatalized ejective affricate /cʼ/ or /d͡ʒ/ (English j).^[92][94]

Beyond uniliterals, scribes utilized approximately eighty biliteral signs (conveying two consonants, such as pr, mn, ḥr, jr, nw, bꜣ, kꜣ, sw) and roughly fifty to sixty triliteral signs (conveying three consonants, such as nfr, ˁnḫ, ḥtp, ḫpr, wsr, nṯr).^[89] A limited number of multiconsonantal signs represented four or more consonants, including mꜣˁt, špsy, and ḏḥty. Although the entire Egyptian vocabulary could have been recorded using only the 24 alphabetic uniliterals, Egyptians never abandoned multiconsonantal signs or logograms, preferring an orthography rich in redundancy and graphic variety.^[82][93][95]

Phonetic complements

Egyptian orthography was characterized by systematic graphic redundancy through the use of phonetic complements.^[96] Scribes regularly accompanied biliteral and triliteral phonograms with uniliteral alphabetic signs that confirmed their pronunciation.^[96] For example, the triliteral sign for 'beautiful' or 'good' (nfr, depicting the heart and windpipe) was rarely written alone; instead, scribes added the uniliterals for f (horned viper) and r (mouth), spelling nfr+f+r.^[96] Despite the addition of f and r, the word was pronounced simply as nfr, the uniliterals serving as silent reading guides.^[96]

Phonetic complements resolved ambiguity in multiconsonantal signs that possessed multiple readings (polyphony).^[96][97] For instance, the hieroglyphic sign depicting a flight of stairs could be read as st, ws, or ḥtm depending on context. When followed by the uniliteral t, it signaled the reading st ('seat' or 'throne'); when accompanied by the eye (jr), it indicated the reading ws (in Wsjr, 'Osiris'); and when framed by ḥ, m, and t, it was read as ḥtm ('to disappear' or 'destroy'). Similarly, the chisel sign could represent either ꜣb or mḥr; scribes added a terminal b to indicate ꜣb (spelled ꜣb-b) or framed it with m and r to specify mḥr.^[96][97] Phonetic complements could be placed after the root sign, precede it, or frame it symmetrically.^[97]

Phonetic complements also accommodated linguistic sound changes over time. When Middle Egyptian pronunciation shifted certain phonemes, scribes frequently preserved historical orthography alongside contemporary sounds. For example, the Old Egyptian adjective bnj ('sweet') had shifted in pronunciation to bnr; Middle Egyptian scribes wrote bnrj (combining b, n, r, and j), maintaining the historical j in writing while pronouncing the word as bnr. In a similar manner, the verb swri ('to drink') came to be pronounced swj, yet scribes retained the historical r glyph in the script.

Semantic reading (Logograms and determinatives)

Logograms (or ideograms) were characters that directly represented the physical object or concept they depicted.^{[3][83][98][99]} A logogram was typically distinguished from a phonetic glyph by an accompanying vertical ideogram stroke (|) placed beneath or beside it.^[99] Thus, the sun disc (rꜥ) accompanied by a vertical stroke stood for 'sun' or 'day'; the plan of a house (pr) with a stroke meant 'house'; the mountain sign (ḏw) with a stroke signified 'mountain'; and a mouth (r) with a stroke meant 'mouth'.^[98][99] In metaphoric or metonymic associations, the character depicting a temple standard (nṯr) represented 'god'; the human-headed bird (bꜣ) represented the soul ('ba'); and the flamingo (dšr) represented the concept 'red'.^[99]

Determinatives (semagrams or classifiers) were mute semantic markers positioned at the conclusion of words.^{[3][98][100][101]} They possessed no phonetic sound value and were not pronounced.^[101] Instead, determinatives clarified the semantic category of the preceding phonetic spelling, disambiguating homophones that shared identical consonantal structures.^{[3][98][100][101]} For example, the consonantal root wn could carry diverse meanings: followed by a door wing determinative, it meant 'to open'; followed by walking legs, it meant 'to hasten'; followed by a sparrow (signifying bad, defect, or smallness), it meant 'fault', 'guilt', or 'shortcoming'; and followed by a lock of hair, it meant 'to become bald' or 'to mourn'.^[102]

Determinatives also had the orthographic function of marking word boundaries.^[101] Because ancient Egyptian lacked punctuation and word spaces, determinatives signaled to the reader where one vocabulary unit ended and the next commenced.^[101] In rare instances known as phonetic determinatives, a determinative became so fused to a specific word that the entire grouping was transferred as a phonetic rebus to spell unrelated words sharing the same consonantal consonants.^{[103][104][105]} For example, the determinative of a leaping goat in jb ('kid' or 'goat') was borrowed to write the verb jbj ('to be thirsty'); similarly, the logogram for town (nꜣ.t) was used to spell ḥnꜣ.t ('pelican').^{[103][104][105][106][107]}

Calligraphic conventions and graphic alterations

Egyptian scribes adhered to strict calligraphic rules balancing aesthetics, space utilization, and religious propriety. In honorific transposition (or respectful inversion), the name of a god or king was transposed to the head of a compound word, phrase, or sentence, even though it was pronounced last in speech. In royal prenomen titles, the glyph for the sun god Ra was written first: the throne name of Senusret II, Khakheperre (Ḫˁj-ḫpr-Rˁ), placed the solar disc (Ra) at the beginning of the cartouche, though pronounced at the end. Similarly, the title ḥm-nṯr ('servant of the god' or 'priest') placed the temple flag (nṯr, 'god') before the servant glyph (ḥm).

In sacred contexts, particularly mortuary inscriptions such as the Pyramid Texts of the Old Kingdom, scribes practiced the mutilation or suppression of signs representing living creatures.^[108][109] Because hieroglyphs were believed to possess magical vitality that could animate images, priests feared that figures of dangerous animals, such as scorpions, horned vipers, and wild beasts, could harm the deceased soul entombed nearby. Scribes ritually mutilated these signs by bisecting horned vipers with a cut line, carving human figures without legs or truncated at the waist, omitting lions, or replacing animate determinatives with harmless diagonal strokes or generic strokes.^[108][109]

Scribes employed several specialized auxiliary marks.^[82] A substitute sign that replaced determinatives depicting living beings was later used in hieratic for all determinatives that were difficult to draw..^[108] Mute filling strokes were inserted to eliminate empty pockets at the base of an incomplete quadrat. Ligatured glyphs merged two discrete characters into a unified sign with independent value, such as a forearm clutching a scepter to signify 'to command'. Dual numbers were marked grammatically by doubling the sign or appending two diagonal strokes, while plural numbers were indicated by tripling the sign or adding three vertical ticks. Royal names were enveloped within a cartouche (shenu), an oval loop formed of double rope tied with a knot at the base, which symbolized protective cosmic infinity and enclosed the king's prenomen (throne name) and nomen (birth name).^[91][110]

Group writing and syllabic notation

. To transcribe foreign West Semitic, Aegean, and Nubian personal names, geographic toponyms, and loanwords into Egyptian texts, scribes adapted hieroglyphs into a system known as group writing or syllabic orthography.^[111][112] Groups of one, two, or three hieroglyphic signs formed composite phonetic clusters that conveyed specific consonant and vowel combinations.^[111][112]

Linguists such as Wolfgang Schenkel and Wolfgang Helck demonstrated that syllabic orthography enabled scribes to denote foreign vocalization, particularly vowels /i/ and /u/, while /a/ was often left unmarked or represented by aleph.^[111][112] For example, the Aegean city of Amnissos on Crete was transcribed into Egyptian syllabic clusters as jmnyšꜣ, analyzed phonologically as ˀ(a)-m(a)-ni-š(a).^[111][112] This practice mirrors modern Japanese katakana syllabaries used to transcribe foreign terminology.^[111][112]

Numerical and measurement systems

The ancient Egyptians employed a non-positional decimal numbering system based on powers of ten. Separate signs existed for 1, 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, 100,000 and 1,000,000: * 1: wꜥ * 10: mdw * 100: št * 1,000: ḫꜣ * 10,000: dbꜥ * 100,000: ḥfnw * 1,000,000: ḥḥ Other numbers were written with these signs; for example, 209,621 was written as 2 × 100,000 + 9 × 1,000 + 6 × 100 + 2 × 10 + 1, and a stone carving from Karnak shows the number 4622.

Fractions with a numerator of one and a denominator that was a multiple of two were written with the separate parts of the Wedjat eye.: For example, the left part of the eye stood for 1/2 and the eyebrow for 1/8, and the whole eye had the value 63/64. Other signs were used for the fractions 1/3, 1/2, 2/3 and 3/4.

Scribes and scribal education

The share of literate people in the Egyptian population is unclear, but it was probably only a few percent. The Egyptian word sesh (sš) meant both scribe and official, and there was no separate word for an official. Scribes recorded the level of the Nile floods, the state of the canals and dikes, and the stocks in the granaries, and kept accounts of food for the people employed in building temples and pyramids. Becoming a scribe was the aim of any Egyptian of humble origin, as it counted for more than a military career, and no one who had not been a scribe could reach a high position in government.

Knowledge of the early Egyptian educational system remains fragmentary. During the Old Kingdom, scribal instruction followed the famulus system: young boys apprenticed directly under their fathers or senior officials, performing manual tasks in government offices while learning to draft documents through direct practical training.^[113][114] By the Middle and New Kingdoms, formalized scribal schools operated at the royal court, central administrative departments, and temple precincts.^[113][114] Training lasted four to five years.^[115] Pupils began their schooling by mastering cursive scripts (first Hieratic, and later Demotic), copying model letters and administrative accounts on pottery ostraca and wooden boards.^[113][114] Monumental hieroglyphs were taught only at advanced levels; consequently, many administrative scribes could write fluent Hieratic without possessing the calligraphic expertise to carve formal monumental hieroglyphs.^[113][114] Scribes copied standard school literature, such as the Book of Kemyt and the Teaching of Khety (the 'Satire on the Trades'), which extolled the privileges, physical ease, and dignity of the scribal career while cataloging the hardships endured by potters, stonemasons, weavers, and farmers.^[114] Strict discipline was enforced by teachers through beatings and detention, captured by the Egyptian school maxim: 'A boy's ear is on his back; he listens when he is beaten'.^{[113][114][116]}

Scribes carried their professional implements in specialized cases.^[117] The standard kit included a wooden writing palette fitted with grooved slots for rush pens (rush stalks approximately 15 to 33 cm in length, their tips hammered flat or cut diagonally to form fibrous brush heads).^[117] In the third century BC, the Greeks brought the split-tipped reed pen into use in Egypt. The palette contained two circular wells holding solid pigment cakes: black ink (manufactured from soot powder mixed with gum arabic binder) for body text, and red ink (manufactured from cinnabar, mercuric sulfide, or red iron oxide) for headings, chapter titles, opening words, and corrections (rubrication).^[117] Names of gods were never inked in red. Scribes carried a small pot or leather water vessel to moisten ink cakes, a smoothing board to press down papyrus sheets, and a bronze knife for cutting papyrus rolls.^[117] The longest surviving Egyptian papyrus roll extends 40 meters in length. Leather rolls were reserved for texts of high importance. On monumental wall decorations, apprentice draftsmen sketched initial outlines using red ochre, senior master scribes corrected line contours in black ink, and stone sculptors subsequently chiseled the figures in low or high relief before painters applied mineral pigments.^[117]

Cryptographic hieroglyphs

From the middle of the third millennium BC, and most of all in the New Kingdom (from 1539 BC), some texts were written in unusual hieroglyphic signs that look at first sight like secret writing. These texts lack the familiar groups of words, use many signs outside the standard canon, and change both the shapes of signs and which signs are chosen. For example, the sign of a man carrying a basket on his head, a determinative with no sound value in the classical script, was read in cryptographic writing as the consonant normally written with the horned viper sign, because the sign stood for the word 'to carry', of which only that consonant was kept. The mouth, drawn from the front in the classical script, was drawn in profile, with the same sound value.

The purpose of this writing was probably to entice readers to enjoy decoding it. The encrypted texts usually contained a request from their writer to say a prayer for his welfare, which suggests that the number of people able to decipher them was not small. These inscriptions show that, alongside school teaching based on memorization rather than analytical understanding, another tradition passed on knowledge of the basic principles of the script.

Modern transliteration and vocalization

Egyptological transliteration converts hieroglyphic texts into Latin alphabetic symbols carrying diacritical marks to represent ancient consonantal phonemes.^{[118][119][120]} Transliteration records phonetic values and morphological structures while omitting mute determinatives; consequently, transliterated text cannot be converted back into unique hieroglyphic signs automatically.^{[118][119][120]} Across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, competing regional conventions emerged:^{[118][119][120]}

* The Berlin School system, established by Adolf Erman and Hermann Grapow in the Wörterbuch der ägyptischen Sprache, employed ṯ and ḏ for affricates and a simple period (.) to separate pronominal suffixes.^{[118][119][120]} * The system of Alan Gardiner's Egyptian Grammar (1927) writes ḳ, as do Erman and Grapow, Malaise and Winand, and Schenkel, where Peust, Allen, Loprieno, Hannig, Edel and the Leiden Unified Transliteration write q. * The Tübingen School, led by Wolfgang Schenkel, introduced č and č̣ in place of ṯ and ḏ, utilized ṭ for d, and established up to five distinct morphological structural boundary marks (such as colons and equal signs) to separate verbal prefixes and inflectional suffixes.^{[118][119][120]} * Peust and Schenkel write the final consonant of weak verbs as i̯, and Schenkel also uses u̯, while Peust, Schenkel and the Leiden Unified Transliteration use ï where most other systems write j or y.

To resolve decades of scholarly divergences, the International Association of Egyptologists (IAE) formally adopted the Leiden Unified Transliteration/Transcription during the Thirteenth International Congress of Egyptologists (ICE13) held in Leiden in August 2023, establishing a standardized scientific transliteration standard for ancient Egyptian.^[121][122]

Because hieroglyphs did not record vowels and Coptic, the descendant of the Egyptian language, died out as an everyday language, the pronunciation of Egyptian words cannot be reconstructed with certainty. Clues to the pronunciation come from Coptic, from disputed Afroasiatic sound correspondences, and from Greek and cuneiform transcriptions of Egyptian names and words. To pronounce transliterated text, Egyptologists insert an e between many consonants, and conventions differ between universities: nfrt (the feminine form of nfr, 'beautiful') is pronounced neferet in many places in Germany, nefret elsewhere in Germany, and nefert at, among others, Russian institutions.

Typographical and computational encoding

In 1927, Sir Alan Gardiner published his catalog of 763 hieroglyphs in Egyptian Grammar, organized into 26 thematic categories denoted by letters A through Z, with an extra category (Aa) for unclassified signs.^{[82][123][124]} Gardiner's Sign List remains the baseline taxonomic standard in Egyptology.^{[82][123][124]} In the 1980s, an expanded four-volume catalog of Ptolemaic signs was compiled, later refined in the grammatical works of Dieter Kurth.^[125][126] In 1984, an international committee developed the Manuel de Codage (MdC), establishing an ASCII-based encoding syntax for digital transcription.^[127][128] MdC syntax encodes spatial arrangements: hyphens (-) connect sequential signs, asterisks (*) bind horizontal groups, colons (:) stack signs vertically into quadrats, parentheses group nested clusters, and angle brackets (< >) denote cartouches.^[127][128]

Egyptian hieroglyphs were incorporated into the Unicode Standard in October 2009 with the release of Unicode 5.2, creating the Egyptian Hieroglyphs block spanning code points U+13000 to U+1342F.^[129][130] This block arranged its signs in the order of Gardiner's list and is supported by the fonts Aegyptus, NewGardiner, Noto Sans Egyptian Hieroglyphs and JSeshFont, and by Segoe UI Historic, bundled with Windows 10, which excludes three glyphs depicting a phallus (Gardiner's D52, D52A and D53).^{[129][131][132]} Dedicated software applications for typesetting hieroglyphs include JSesh, WinGlyph, MacScribe, InScribe, and WikiHiero.^[130][133]

In March 2019, Unicode version 12.0 introduced the Egyptian Hieroglyph Format Controls block (U+13430–U+1345F), which provided control characters to digitally reproduce complex quadrat configurations, sign overlays, horizontal joiners (U+13431), vertical joiners (U+13430), corner insertions, and damaged sign markers.^[134] In September 2024, Unicode version 16.0 added the Egyptian Hieroglyphs Extended-A block (U+13460–U+143FF), introducing 3,995 additional characters to encode the vast repertoire of Ptolemaic and variant signs.^[129][135]

References

1. Jones, Daniel (2003) [1917], Roach, Peter; Hartmann, James; Setter, Jane (eds.), English Pronouncing Dictionary, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-3-12-539683-8
2. In total, there were about 1,000 graphemes in use during the Old Kingdom period; this number decreased to 750–850 during the Middle Kingdom, but rose instead to around 5,000 signs during the Ptolemaic period. Antonio Loprieno, Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995), p. 12.
3. Jan Assmann: Stein und Zeit: Mensch und Gesellschaft im Alten Ägypten. Fink, München 2003, ISBN 3-7705-2681-3. S. 80.
4. Richard Mattessich (2002). "The oldest writings, and inventory tags of Egypt". Accounting Historians Journal. 29 (1): 195–208. doi:10.2308/0148-4184.29.1.195. JSTOR 40698264. S2CID 160704269. Archived from the original on 2018-11-19. Retrieved 2016-08-27.
5. Günter Dreyer, Recent Discoveries at Abydos Cemetery U, dans « The Nile Delta in Transition : 4th-3th Millenium BC », Édit. M. Van Den Brink, Tel Aviv, 1992, p. 293-1299.
6. Howard, Michael C. (2012). Transnationalism in Ancient and Medieval Societies. p. 23.
7. ἱερογλυφικός. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project.
8. ἱερογλυφικός, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek–English Lexicon, Perseus Digital Library
9. ἱερός in Liddell and Scott.
10. γλύφω in Liddell and Scott
11. ἱερόγλυφος in Liddell and Scott.
12. Antonio Loprieno, Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995), p. 11.
13. Plutarco τά ἱερογλυφικά [γράμματα]
14. "Hieroglyphic". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 2016-08-27.Harper, Douglas. "hieroglyphic". Online Etymology Dictionary.
15. Giacomo Devoto, Avviamento all'etimologia italiana, Milano, Mondadori, 1979, p. 186.
16. "Definisi Hieroglif". Diakses tanggal 2011-03-13.
17. 『ブリタニカ国際大百科事典』ブリタニカ・ジャパン、2006、EX-word DATAPLUS 3搭載。
18. Joly, Marcel (2003). "Sayles, George(, Sr.)". Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.j397600.
19. Joly, Marcel (2003). «Sayles, George(, Sr.)». Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.j397600
20. Günter Dreyer, Recent Discoveries at Abydos Cemetery U, en «The Nile Delta in Transition : 4th-3th Millenium BC », Édit. M. Van Den Brink, Tel Aviv, 1992, pp. 293-1299.
21. «…The Mesopotamians invented writing around 3200 bc without any precedent to guide them, as did the Egyptians, independently as far as we know, at approxi- mately the same time» The Oxford History of Historical Writing. Vol. 1. To AD 600, p. 5
22. Günter Dreyer: Umm el-Qaab I, Das prädynastische Königsgrab U-j und seine frühen Schriftzeugnisse. von Zabern, Mainz 1998, ISBN 3-8053-2486-3.
23. Allen 2014, p. 2.
24. Scarre, Chris; Fagan, Brian M. (2016). Ancient Civilizations. Routledge. p. 106. ISBN 978-1317296089.
25. "The seal impressions, from various tombs, date even further back, to 3400 B.C. These dates challenge the commonly held belief that early logographs, pictographic symbols representing a specific place, object, or quantity, first evolved into more complex phonetic symbols in Mesopotamia."Mitchell, Larkin. "Earliest Egyptian Glyphs". Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America. Retrieved 29 February 2012.
26. Christian Greco, « Le pouvoir des hiéroglyphes... Et de l'écriture », Courrier international, no 1737,‎ 15-21 février 2024, p. 46, traduction d'un article paru dans La Repubblica le 21 décembre 2023.
27. Bess Connolly Martell (20 de junio de 2017). «Yale archaeologists discover earliest monumental Egyptian hieroglyphs». Yale News. Consultado el 27 de junio de 2017.
28. Sampson, Geoffrey (1990). Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. Stanford University Press. p. 78. ISBN 978-0-8047-1756-4. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
29. Krebs, Robert E.; Krebs, Carolyn A. (2003). Groundbreaking scientific experiments, inventions, and discoveries of the ancient world. Greenwood. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-313-31342-4. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
30. Francis Amadeus Karl Breyer: Die Schriftzeugnisse des Prädynastischen Königsgrabes U-j in Umm el-Qaab: Versuch einer Neuinterpretation. In: The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. Nr. 88, 2002, S. 53–65.
31. (en) Peter T. Daniels, « The First Civilizations », dans Peter T. Daniels et William Bright, The World's Writing Systems, 1996, p. 24.
32. Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (1995). The international standard Bible encyclopedia. Wm. B. Eerdmans. p. 1150. ISBN 978-0-8028-3784-4. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
33. Iorwerth Eiddon Stephen Edwards, et al., The Cambridge Ancient History (3.ª ed. 1970) pp. 43–44.
34. David, Rosalie (2002). The Experience of Ancient Egypt. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-96799-5. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
35. Ancient Civilizations of Africa. Unesco General History of Africa. Vol. 2 (Abridged ed.). London: J. Currey. 1990. pp. 11–12. ISBN 0852550928.
36. Ancient Civilizations of Africa. Col: Unesco General History of Africa. 2 Abridged ed. Londres: J. Currey. 1990. pp. 11–12. ISBN 0852550928
37. Wagensonner, Klaus, Yale University, Department Member (1 January 2024). "Visible Language: The Early Use of Writing in Egypt".
38. Mieroop, Marc Van De (20 January 2021). A History of Ancient Egypt. John Wiley & Sons. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-119-62089-1.
39. Edel 1955, p. 13.
40. Tabula Aegyptiaca hieroglyphicis exornata, Acta Eruditorum, Leipzig, 1714 (lire en ligne).
41. H. Brunner, Hermann Kees, Ägyptische Schrift und Sprache, Brill 1973 ,ISBN 90-04-03777-2, p.46.
42. ”Inventory and accounts from a temple of Abusir” (på engelska). Louvre. Arkiverad från originalet den 19 mars 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200319234606/https://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/inventory-and-accounts-temple-abusir. Läst 11 januari 2021.
43. ”Demotic script | ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic writing” (på engelska). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/demotic-script. Läst 11 januari 2021.
44. ”Writing doesn't always end in alphabets - the enigmatic Egyptian counterexample” (på engelska). NativLang. 30 december 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_oFUrgC9rA&t=412s. Läst 11 januari 2021.
45. Johanna Brankaer. Coptic: A Learning Grammar (Sahidic). Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010, p. 3–. ISBN 978-3-447-05894-0.
46. W. V. Davies, p. 129 sqq ; voir aussi J. F. Healy, p. 197 sqq.
47. Oldest alphabet found in Egypt. BBC. 1999-11-15. Retrieved 2015-01-14. نسخة محفوظة 7 يونيو 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين
48. Davies 1987, s. 57–60.
49. Allen, James P. (2010). Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs. Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-1139486354.
50. Wesentlich geringer wird die Zahl der ptolemäischen Zeichen von Leitz, 2004 angesetzt.
51. «Hieratic script» (en anglès). Encyclopædia Britannica. [Consulta: 9 octubre 2022].
52. Devauchelle, Didier: Bulletin de la société française d'égyptologie, 131 (1994), p. 16-18.
53. The Latest Known Inscription Written in Egyptian Hieroglyphs (August 24, 394 CE) : HistoryofInformation.com (англ.). www.historyofinformation.com. Дата обращения: 6 апреля 2018. Архивировано 24 июня 2017 года.
54. Allen 2014, p. 8.
55. Frank R. Trombley. Hellenic Religion and Christianization: C. 370-529. BRILL, 2001, p. 234–. ISBN 0-391-04121-5.
56. PARKINSON, RICHARD, 1999. Cracking Codes: The Rosetta Stone and Decipherment, 178. or.
57. El Daly, Okasha (2005). Egyptology: The Missing Millennium 'Ancient Egypt in Medieval Arabic Writings'. ULC Press (UK). pp. 139–140. ISBN 1-84472-063-2.
58. ফরহাদ খান। হারিয়ে যাওয়া হরফের কাহিনী (ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০০৫ সংস্করণ)। ঢাকা: দিব্যপ্রকাশ। পৃ. ২৭২। আইএসবিএন ৯৮৪-৪৮৩-১৭৯-২। ; ; ; ; ; ;
59. « Les langues sacrées ont laissé lire leur vocabulaire perdu ; jusque sur les granits de Mezraïm, Champollion a déchiffré ces hiéroglyphes qui semblaient être un sceau mis sur les lèvres du désert, et qui répondait de leur éternelle discrétion… » (François-René de Chateaubriand, Les Mémoires d’Outre-Tombe, IV, XII, chap. 9).
60. Frankfurter, David: Religion in Roman Egypt: Assimilation and Resistance, s. 254. (Mythos: The Princeton/Bollingen Series in World Mythology, nide 85) Princeton University Press, 2020. ISBN 9780691214733 Teoksen verkkoversio.
61. Periti, Giancarla: Drawing Relationships in Northern Italian Renaissance Art: Patronage and Theories of Invention, s. 159. Routledge, 2017. ISBN 9781351569231 Teoksen verkkoversio.
62. Westerfeld, Jennifer Taylor: Egyptian Hieroglyphs in the Late Antique Imagination, s. 80. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019. ISBN 9780812296402 Teoksen verkkoversio.
63. Smith, William: ”Horapollo”, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1849–1867. Teoksen verkkoversio. (englanniksi)
64. Robinson, s. 23.
65. Rollet, Pierre; Nostradamus. Nostradamus: Interprétation des hiéroglyphes de Horapollo (en francès). Marcel Petit, 1968.
66. Ahmed ibn 'Ali ibn al Mukhtar ibn 'Abd al Karim (called Ibn Wahshiyah) (1806). Ancient alphabets & hieroglyphic characters explained: with an account of the Egyptian priests, their classes, initiation time, & sacrifices by the aztecs and their birds, in the Arabic language. W. Bulmer & Co. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
67. Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī Ibn Waḥshīyah: Ancient Alphabets and Hieroglyphic Characters Explained. (Original: Šauq al-mustahām fī maʻrifat rumūz al-aqlām). Herausgegeben und übersetzt von Joseph Hammer-Purgstall. London, 1806, S. 43–51 (archive.org, archive.org)
68. علم التعمية واستخراج المعمى عند العرب نسخة محفوظة 24 مايو 2020 على موقع واي باك مشين
69. (en) Arab scholar 'cracked Rosetta code' 800 years before the West. Gearchiveerd op 20 januari 2023.
70. (en) Ancient Alphabets And Hieroglyphics Explained, in the Arabic language by Ahmad Bin Abubekr Bin Wahshih and in English by Joseph Hammer, London, 1806 (Google Books)
71. Michel Dewachter, Champollion : Un scribe pour l'Égypte, Paris, Gallimard, coll. « Découvertes Gallimard / Archéologie » (no 96), 1990, 144 p., p. 130.
72. ”Jean-François Champollion | French historian and linguist” (på engelska). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jean-Francois-Champollion. Läst 11 januari 2021.
73. Davies 1987, s. 50–56.
74. Simon Singh: Geheime Botschaften. Die Kunst der Verschlüsselung von der Antike bis in die Zeiten des Internet. dtv 2005, S. 247–265.
75. Houston, Stephen; Baines, John; Cooper, Jerrold (July 2003). "Last Writing: Script Obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 45 (3). doi:10.1017/s0010417503000227. ISSN 0010-4175. S2CID 145542213.
76. Nadine Gola, Heinz-Josef Thissen: Entzifferung und Systematisierung der Hieroglyphen. lepsius online, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 4. Mai 2014; abgerufen am 16. Dezember 2018.
77. Jean-François Champollion, Letter to M. Dacier, September 27, 1822
78. Jean-François Champollion: Lettre à M. Dacier relative à l'alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques. 27 Sept. 1822.
79. Jean-François Champollion, Lettre à M. Dacier relative à l'alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques, 27 septembre 1822.
80. "Jean Francois Champollion: The Father of Egyptology". Arkiveret fra originalen 6. december 2010. Hentet 9. december 2010.
81. Richard Lepsius: Lettre à M. Rosellini sur l’alphabet hiéroglyphique. Rom 1837.
82. გარდინერი 1927
83. The Ancient Egyptian Language: An Historical Study. (англ.). — Cambridge University Press, 2013. — ISBN 978-1-107-66467-8.
84. Ботанцов, И. В.; Ботанцов, Д. В. Основы древнеегипетского языка. — третье издание. — М.: Флинта, 2015. — С. 22. — ISBN 978-5-9765-1671-7.
85. Allen, James P. (febrero de 2024). «Capitulo 1: Lenguaje y escritura». En López-López, Raúl, ed. Middle Egyptian (M. Victoria Almansa-Villatoro, trad.) [Egipcio jeroglífico: Introducción a la escritura y cultura del antiguo egipto]. AlmuzaraLibros. pp. 24-25. ISBN 9788415462989.
86. Sir Alan H. Gardiner, Egyptian Grammar, Third Edition Revised, Griffith Institute (2005), p. 25.
87. Sir Alan H. Gardiner. Egyptian Grammar (англ.). — Griffith Institute, 2005. — P. 25.
88. такі парадак яшчэ называўся «бустрафедон»; азначае, што напрамак радкоў чаргаваўся: справа-налева, злева-направа і г.д.
89. Zu möglichen Ausnahmen vergleiche: Wolfgang Schenkel: Rebus-, Buchstabiersilben- und Konsonantenschrift. In: Göttinger Miszellen. Band 52, Göttingen 1981, S. 83–95.
90. A. H. Gardiner. Egyptian Grammar; Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs. 3rd ed. — Oxford: Griffith Institute, 1957.
91. FONTOURA JR., Antonio. Hieróglifos Egípcios: um curso de introdução à leitura e decifração de textos do Antigo Egito. Curitiba: PatolaLivros, 2010.
92. Jacq, Christian (1994). «1ª parte, 4». El enigma de la piedra (1 edición). Barcelona: B, S.S. pp. 41-42. ISBN 8440690924. «Título original Le petit Champollion illustré».
93. laut Erik Hornung: Einführung in die Ägyptologie. Stand; Methoden; Aufgaben. 7., unveränderte Auflage, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 2010, ISBN 978-3-534-23641-1, S. 22f.
94. Коростовцев М.А. Введение в египетскую филологию / Отд. ред. Струве В.В. — М.: АН СССР. Институт народов Азии. Издательство восточной литературы, 1963.
95. Gardiner, Alan H. (1973). Egyptian Grammar. Griffith Institute. ISBN 978-0-900416-35-4.
96. mḥr nach Joachim Friedrich Quack: Zum Lautwert von Gardiner Sign-List U 23. In: Lingua Aegyptia. Nr. 11, Göttingen 2003, S. 113–116. ISSN 0946-8641
97. Joachim Friedrich Quack: Zum Lautwert von Gardiner Sign-List U 23. In: Lingua Aegyptia. Göttingen 2003, S. 113–116. ISSN 0946-8641
98. Antonio Loprieno, Ancient Egyptian, A Linguistic Introduction, Cambridge University Press (1995), p. 13
99. (en) Antonio Loprieno, Ancient Egyptian : A Linguistic Introduction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, 322 p., poche (ISBN 978-0-521-44849-9, LCCN 95014789, lire en ligne), p. 13.
100. GARDINER, A. Egyptian Grammar: being an introduction to the study of hieroglyphs.Oxford: Griffith Institute, 1988.
101. Коростовцев М.А. Введение в египетскую филологию // § 7—8 / Отв. ред. Струве В. В.. — М.: Издательство восточной литературы, 1963.
102. Daniel A. Werning: §8, Funktion von Klassifikatoren. (Digitale Einführung in die hieroglyphisch-ägyptische Schrift und Sprache) Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 14. Mai 2018.
103. So die Lesung bei E. Edel: Altägyptische Grammatik. S. 605. Vgl. aber: njw.t bei A. Gardiner: Egyptian Grammar. Oxford 1927, S. 498 und in Anlehnung daran Hannig: Handwörterbuch. S. 414.
104. E. Edel: Altägyptische Grammatik. S. 605. Vgl. aber: njw.t bei Gardiner: Egyptian Grammar, S. 498 und in Anlehnung daran Hannig: Handwörterbuch. S. 414.
105. Так, прачытанне паводле E. Edel: Altägyptische Grammatik. S. 605. Але параўн.: njw.t паводле Гардынера: Egyptian Grammar, S. 498 і ў дадатку к Hannig: Handwörterbuch. S. 414.
106. Die zitierten Schreibungen für „Pelikan“ stammen aus den Pyramidentexten, § 278 b, bzw. dem Papyrus Ebers (Notiz (Memento vom 15. Mai 2012 im Internet Archive))
107. ამგვარი დაწერილობა გვხვდება პირამიდის ტექსტებში § 278 b, ასევე ებერსის პაპირუსში.
108. P. Lacau: Suppressions et modifications de signes dans les textes funéraires. In: Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde. Leipzig 1914, Nr. 51, S. 1 ff. (Nachdruck: Biblio, Osnabrück 1975), ISSN 0044-216X.
109. P. Lacau: Suppressions et modifications de signes dans les textes funéraires. In: Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde. Leipzig 1914, Nr. 51, S. 1 ff. (Nachdr. Biblio, Osnabrück 1975), ISSN 0044-216X.
110. Jean Winand, Une histoire personnelle des pharaons, 2017 (lire en ligne), p. 261 à 213.
111. Wolfgang Helck: Die Beziehungen Ägyptens zu Vorderasien im 3. und 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr (= Ägyptologische Abhandlungen. Band 5). 2. Auflage, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1971, S. 505–575, ISBN 3-447-01298-6.
112. Wolfgang Helck: Die Beziehungen Ägyptens zu Vorderasien im 3. und 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen. Bd. 5. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1971 (2. Aufl.), S. 505–575. ISBN 3-447-01298-6
113. H. Brunner: Schule. In: Lexikon der Ägyptologie. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1984, ISBN 3-447-02489-5, Spalte 741–743.
114. H. Brunner: Schule. In: Lexikon der Ägyptologie. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1984, Spalte 741–743, ISBN 3-447-02489-5.
115. Scribes Ancient Egypt. The Britith Museum. Viitattu 9.3.2018.
116. Tofiq Mustafazadə. Ümumi tarix. Bakı. 2009. səh. 70-71.
117. Scribes Canadian Museum of History. Arkistoitu 17.2.2018. Viitattu 9.3.2018.
118. E. Edel: Altägyptische Grammatik. § 103; Wolfgang Schenkel: Aus der Arbeit an einer Konkordanz zu den altägyptischen Sargtexten (= Göttinger Orientforschungen. 4. Reihe. Band 12). Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1983, ISBN 3-447-02335-X.
119. Wolfgang Schenkel: Tübinger Einführung …, § 2.2 c).
120. E. Edel: Altägyptische Grammatik. § 103; Wolfgang Schenkel: Aus der Arbeit an einer Konkordanz zu den altägyptischen Sargtexten. Göttinger Orientforschungen. 4. Reihe. Bd. 12. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1983, ISBN 3-447-02335-X.
121. 13th International Congress of Egyptologists: The Leiden Unified Transliteration. Auf: www.iae-egyptology.org/. zuletzt abgerufen am 13. November 2024.
122. Pragt, Huub, Hiërogliefenschrift. Egyptologie.nl (29 april 2015). Geraadpleegd op 29 september 2023.
123. A.H. Gardiner, Egyptian Grammar: Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs. 3rd Ed., pub. Griffith Institute, Oxford, 1957 (1st edition 1927), pp. 438–548 (pdf).
124. Gardiner A. H. Egyptian Grammar. Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs. — 1927.
125. Valeurs phonétiques des signes hiéroglyphiques d'époque gréco-romaine. Montpellier, Publications de la Recherche — Université de Montpellier, 1988—1995.
126. Kurth D. Einführung ins Ptolemäische. Eine Grammatik mit Zeichenliste und Übungsstücken. — Hützel: «Backe-Verlag», 2007—2008. — Т. 1-2.
127. Jan Buurman, Nicolas Grimal unter anderem: Inventaire des signes hiéroglyphiques en vue de leur saisie informatique: manuel de codage des textes hiéroglyphiques en vue de leur saisie sur ordinateur (= Informatique et Egyptology. Band 2). De Boccard, Paris 1988.
128. Jan Buurman, Nicolas Grimal u. a.: Inventaire des signes hiéroglyphiques en vue de leur saisie informatique: manuel de codage des textes hiéroglyphiques en vue de leur saisie sur ordinateur. Informatique et Egyptology. Bd. 2. De Boccard, Paris 1988.
129. Egyptian Hieroglyphs Extended-A. Range: 13460–143FF, Unicode
130. 2006—2011, М. В. Панов, Э. В. Балюк, регистрационный номер Библиотеки при Конгрессе США — TXu001579886
131. "Segoe UI Historic Phallus Microsoft Censorship – Fonts in the Spludlow Framework". Spludlow Framework. Retrieved 2019-05-13.
132. Script and font support in Windows. [2024-10-04]. （原始内容存档于2025-03-13）.
133. JSesh, An Open Source Hieroglyphic Editor.
134. Egyptian Hieroglyph Format Controls. Range: 13430–1345F, Unicode
135. WG2 N5240R2 Encoding proposal for an extended Egyptian Hieroglyphs repertoire, 2023-12-29, L2/23-181R2