Pharaoh

Etymology and Terminology

The term pharaoh derives from the Egyptian compound pr ꜥꜣ, reconstructed as having been pronounced *[ˌpaɾuwˈʕaʀ] in earlier stages and *[parʕoʔ] in Late Egyptian.^[1][2][3] The compound consists of two biliteral hieroglyphs: pr ('house') and ꜥꜣ ('column', with the meaning 'great' or 'high').^[1] It originally referred to the royal palace or court rather than to the person of the monarch.^[1][2][4] In Old and Middle Kingdom documents, the term appeared only in composite administrative titles such as smr pr-ꜥꜣ ('Courtier of the High House').^[1] Beginning in the Twelfth Dynasty, it occurred in the wish formula 'Great House, May it Live, Prosper, and be in Health', though this phrase continued to address the palace buildings rather than a human sovereign.^[1][2]

During the Eighteenth Dynasty of the New Kingdom, pr-ꜥꜣ began to be employed as a reverential metonym for the ruler.^[2][5][6] The earliest confirmed contemporaneous instance in which pr-ꜥꜣ addressed a specific reigning king occurs in a letter to Akhenaten (reigned c. 1353–1336 BCE) addressed to 'Great House, Life, Prosperity, Health, the Lord'.^[5][7] An earlier application may appear on an inscription at the Temple of Armant potentially referring to Thutmose III (reigned c. 1479–1425 BCE).^[8][9] From the Nineteenth Dynasty onward, pr-ꜥꜣ was used as regularly as ḥm ('Majesty').^[10] By the late Twenty-first Dynasty, the word began to be placed directly before the monarch's personal name.^[11][12] The first dated occurrence of this practice appears on a fragment of the Karnak Priestly Annals from Year 17 of Siamun (tenth century BCE), recording the induction of an individual into the Amun priesthood under 'Pharaoh Siamun'.^[12][13] This continued under Psusennes II and the Twenty-second Dynasty, as seen on the Large Dakhla Stela dated to Year 5 of 'Pharaoh Shoshenq, beloved of Amun'.^[14] By the Twenty-fifth Dynasty, pharaoh had become the standard prefix attached to the royal name in ordinary use.^[11]

During the Ptolemaic period, a female form of the title, pr-ꜥꜣ.t, appeared in demotic papyri, although it is not attested in hieroglyphic inscriptions.^[15][16] This term was applied to queens regnant such as Cleopatra II, Cleopatra III, and Cleopatra VII, as well as to royal consorts who were not administrative heads of state, including Berenice II and Cleopatra I Syra.^[15][17] This distribution indicates that pr-ꜥꜣ.t expressed the Ptolemaic political-theological concept of the royal couple ruling as a single unit rather than designating female sovereignty alone.^[15]

The title was adopted into neighbouring languages through diplomatic and trade contacts. Late Egyptian *[parʕoʔ] was rendered by Herodotus into Koine Greek as Pheron (Φερων).^[18] In Biblical Hebrew it was transcribed as Parʿōh (פרעה), which the Septuagint rendered as pharaō (φαραώ), leading to Late Latin pharaō.^{[2][3][18][19]} In the Qur'an, the term appears as Firʿawn (فرعون), where the Arabic form preserves the original Egyptian ayin while taking the Greek final -n.^[19] In domestic Egyptian use, the pronunciation evolved into Sahidic Coptic pərro (ⲡⲣ̅ⲣⲟ) and ərro by rebracketing the initial p- as the masculine definite article pꜣ ('the').^[20] Other indigenous royal titles included nswt ('king'), ḥm ('Majesty'), jty ('sovereign'), nb ('lord'), and ḥqꜣ ('ruler').^[10][21]

Religious conventions placed restrictions on the vocalisation of royal names. In daily usage and administrative transactions, officials routinely used circumlocutions or honorifics such as 'his Majesty' (ḥm=f) or 'the King' (nswt) to avoid speaking the sovereign's sacred name aloud.^[22][23] This custom stemmed from magical beliefs that vocalising the hidden name (ren) of a god or divine ruler exposed the speaker to dangerous supernatural forces or constituted blasphemy.^[22][24] The Greek historian Herodotus similarly recorded strict taboos forbidding the public pronunciation of the name of Osiris in specific ritual settings, reflecting an equivalent religious anxiety regarding the sacred names of divine beings.^[22][24]

Chronological Overview

The historical sequence of pharaonic rule extended across more than three millennia, from roughly 3150 BCE to the Roman annexation in 30 BCE.^[25][26][27] Modern Egyptological frameworks follow the dynastic division first compiled in the third century BCE by the Hellenised Egyptian priest Manetho of Sebennytos in his work Aegyptiaca, written for Ptolemy II Philadelphus.^[25][28] Although Manetho's complete text is lost, epitomes preserved by Josephus, Sextus Julius Africanus, and Eusebius of Caesarea categorize 31 successive dynasties based on the regional origin or capital city of each founding line.^[28] Nineteenth-century scholarship organized these dynasties into broader eras known as the Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms, separated by Intermediate Periods marked by political division and administrative fragmentation.^[25][29]

Unification and Early Dynastic Period

During the Naqada II period (c. 3300 BCE), Upper Egypt was divided among three competing regional proto-states centred at Nubt (Naqada), Nekhen (Hierakonpolis), and Thinis (Abydos).^[30] Elite cemetery use continued unbroken at Nekhen from Naqada I through the First Dynasty, whereas elite burials ceased at Nubt between Naqada III and Dynasty I, suggesting that Nubt was subjugated by its rivals during early state formation.^[30] The adoption of Hor-Nekheny, the falcon god of Nekhen, as the supreme patron of the monarchy indicates that Nekhen's leadership drove political integration, while the royal cemetery at Umm el-Qa'ab in Abydos confirms Thinis as the dominant administrative seat immediately before unification.^[30] Climatic aridification at the end of Naqada I had lowered Nile flood levels, necessitating centralised coordination of irrigation channels and water resources, which accelerated political centralisation under regional rulers.^[26] Upper Egyptian control gradually extended southward to Lower Nubia and northward to southern Palestine near modern Gaza.^[30]

Political unification occurred between the reign of the owner of Abydos tomb U-j (possibly Scorpion I) and the reign of Narmer around 3150 BCE.^[26][30] Narmer commemorated the conquest of the Nile Delta on the Narmer Palette, which depicts him wearing the White Crown of Upper Egypt on one face and the Red Crown of Lower Egypt on the other.^[31][32] Egyptian annals identify the founding pharaoh as Meny (Greek Menes), who redirected the course of the Nile to establish the unified capital of Ineb-hedj ('White Wall', later Memphis) at the junction of Upper and Lower Egypt.^[33][34] Seal impressions from Abydos associate Narmer with the epithet Men(y), meaning 'He who establishes', while an ivory label of his successor Hor-Aha pairs the Nebty name with Meny, indicating that both monarchs contributed to the founding of state institutions.^[35][36] Narmer replaced intermittent levies with regular annual fiscal collections.^[35]

Early Dynastic monarchs of the First and Second Dynasties developed the institutional foundations of kingship.^[34] The ruler was considered an incarnation of the falcon god Horus, and his Horus name was written within a serekh, a frame representing the palace.^[34][37] Egyptology now holds that this identification with Horus does not match the sources, and that at his coronation the king was instead given the office of the 'divine Horus'.^[38] King Den introduced the Nesu-bity ('King of Upper and Lower Egypt') title and celebrated the Sed festival under direct royal control to consolidate secular authority over territorial resources.^[39] Ideological strife surfaced during the Second Dynasty under Seth-Peribsen, who substituted the god Seth for Horus above his serekh.^[39] Scholars interpret this shift as an Upper Egyptian traditionalist reaction against centralized authority.^[39] The conflict was resolved when his successor Khasekhemwy incorporated both Horus and Seth atop his serekh, declaring that 'the two powers are at peace'.^[39][40]

Old Kingdom and Pyramid Builders

The Old Kingdom (c. 2700–2200 BCE), encompassing the Third through Sixth Dynasties, represented the longest continuous period of political stability in early Egyptian history.^[41] Agricultural wealth generated by basin irrigation and royal monopolies on trade with Nubia, the Libyan oases, and the Sinai copper mines enriched the central treasury.^[41][42][43] Monumental stone architecture emerged under Djoser (Third Dynasty), who engaged his architect Imhotep to construct the Step Pyramid complex at Saqqara.^[39][41] Sneferu, founder of the Fourth Dynasty, perfected pyramidal engineering by building monuments at Meidum and Dahshur, including the Bent Pyramid and the Red Pyramid.^[41][44] His successors Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure erected the Great Pyramids at Giza, expressing peak royal centralization.^[39][41]

During the Fourth and Fifth Dynasties, kingship theology shifted toward the Heliopolitan solar cult of Ra.^[39][41][45] Radjedef (Djedefre) was the first monarch to adopt the epithet Sa-Ra ('Son of Ra'), subordinating the earthly king to the sun god.^[39][46] Fifth Dynasty traditions recorded that its first kings were fathered directly by Ra with the wife of a Heliopolitan priest.^[39] Fifth Dynasty pharaohs built dedicated sun temples alongside their pyramids at Abusir, but pyramid dimensions decreased, with Niuserre's pyramid reaching only 50 metres compared to Khufu's 146.5 metres.^[39][47] Under Unas, the final ruler of the Fifth Dynasty, the interior walls of royal burial chambers were inscribed for the first time with the Pyramid Texts, a corpus of protective spells, ascension liturgies, and rituals designed to ensure the king's resurrection as Osiris and solar voyage with Ra.^[48][49][50]

Royal authority eroded steadily during the Sixth Dynasty.^[42][47][51] Climatic drying weakened Nile flood levels, causing agricultural shortfalls.^[47] Concurrently, administrative offices became hereditary, and regional nomarchs built autonomous provincial power bases, constructing elaborate rock-cut tombs within their own districts.^[42][47] Pepi I sought to counter these centrifugal tendencies by marrying the daughters of a powerful Upper Egyptian clan from Abydos, producing heirs Merenre I and Pepi II.^[52] However, during Pepi II's exceptionally long reign, which lasted up to ninety years, the monarchy lost effective control over provincial administrators.^[42][47] Funerary foundations and major provincial temples received permanent tax exemptions, depriving the crown of revenue while trade routes through Sinai and Nubia suffered disruption from nomadic raids.^[42][43] Following the brief reigns of Merenre II and the female monarch Netjerkare (Nitocris), central governance collapsed.^[53]

First Intermediate Period and Social Upheaval

The collapse of the Sixth Dynasty initiated the First Intermediate Period (c. 2181–2040 BCE).^[29][54] Manetho dramatised this disintegration by recording that the Seventh Dynasty comprised seventy kings who reigned for seventy days.^[54] The historical Eighth Dynasty ruled from Memphis over an area limited to the surrounding countryside, exercising titular authority for roughly twenty years.^[29][54] Social unrest broke out across Egypt; royal and noble tombs were plundered, granaries were forced open, administrative records were burned, and irrigation maintenance lapsed, leading to widespread famine.^[29][54] In Upper Egypt, independent nomarchs maintained order within their individual territories by securing grain supplies and defending regional populations.^[29] Two rival centres of power emerged: the Ninth and Tenth Dynasties ruling from Herakleopolis in Lower and Middle Egypt, and the Eleventh Dynasty founded by the Intef family ruling from Thebes in Upper Egypt.^[29][54] Decades of civil conflict culminated around 2040 BCE when Mentuhotep II of Thebes defeated Herakleopolis and reunited Egypt.^[29][55]

Middle Kingdom and Administrative Reorganisation

The Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1782 BCE) established a restructured monarchy.^[55][56] The political disruption of the First Intermediate Period modified Egyptian conceptions of kingship; the ruler was no longer viewed as an infallible god, but as an accountable shepherd responsible for upholding Maat and ensuring social welfare.^[56][57] Non-noble, literate commoners were recruited into administrative roles, creating a loyal bureaucratic class that counterbalanced hereditary provincial aristocrats.^[56] Mentuhotep II initially tolerated influential nomarchs in Middle Egypt while replacing officials elsewhere with Theban loyalists.^[56] The Twelfth Dynasty, founded by Amenemhat I after displacing Mentuhotep IV, relocated the national capital north to Itjtawy near the Faiyum.^[55][58]

Royal centralisation culminated during the reign of Senusret III.^[56][59] He implemented administrative reforms that abolished the hereditary title of 'Great Overlord of the Nome', stripping the provincial nobility of their feudal autonomy and placing all regional administration under three ministerial departments directed by the vizier (tjaty).^[56][59] Externally, Senusret III led campaigns into Nubia, extending Egyptian control past the Second Cataract and erecting massive border fortresses at Semna and Buhen to secure trade corridors.^[56][59] Simultaneously, the crown developed the Faiyum oasis. Senusret II initiated hydrological engineering at El-Lahun, which Amenemhat III completed by constructing dikes and sluices, reclaiming thousands of acres of arable land that functioned as direct crown estates.^[56] Pyramids of brick with a limestone casing were erected at Dahshur, Lisht, Saqqara, Mazghuna and Hawara; less durable and later stripped of their casing, they are now shapeless mounds eroded by the wind.^[60] The dynasty ended with Queen Sobekneferu, who took the throne after Amenemhat IV died without an heir, and who herself died after four years.^[61] The Turin King List gives her reign as three years and ten months.^[62][63]

Second Intermediate Period and Hyksos Rule

The Thirteenth Dynasty retained the centralized bureaucracy developed by Senusret III, but saw rapid royal turnover, with roughly fifty-seven kings ruling across seventy to eighty years.^[64] Weakened central control permitted the eastern Nile Delta to secede under an independent Fourteenth Dynasty based at Xois and Avaris.^[64][65] Around 1650 BCE, Western Asiatic migrants known as the Hyksos (from Egyptian ḥqꜣ-ḫꜣswt, 'rulers of foreign lands') established the Fifteenth Dynasty, ruling northern Egypt from their fortified capital at Avaris.^[65][66] The Hyksos introduced military innovations previously unknown in Egypt, including horse-drawn war chariots, composite bows, and bronze swords.^[65][66] They adopted pharaonic titles, patronised the worship of Seth, and maintained diplomatic ties with Kerma in Upper Nubia.^[65][67] Meanwhile, indigenous Egyptian rulers governed the south from Thebes as the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Dynasties, paying tribute to Avaris.^[65][66]

Hostilities erupted under the Theban king Seqenenre Tao, who died in combat from severe head wounds.^[68] His successor Kamose carried the war north, capturing Middle Egyptian outposts and intercepting messages sent between the Hyksos king Apophis and the ruler of Kush.^[68] Kamose's brother Ahmose I completed the expulsion of the Hyksos around 1540 BCE, besieging and capturing Avaris and pursuing their forces to Sharuhen in southern Palestine.^[66][68] Ahmose then campaigned south into Nubia, establishing the Eighteenth Dynasty and initiating the New Kingdom.^[66]

New Kingdom and Imperial Expansion

The New Kingdom (c. 1540–1070 BCE) covered the Eighteenth, Nineteenth, and Twentieth Dynasties.^[69] Although conquests continued to the south and east, Egypt was no longer the strongest power of the world known to it, facing rivals such as Mitanni, Kassite Babylonia and later the Hittite kingdom.^[69][70] Egyptian forces pushed deep into the Levant and Nubia under Thutmose I and Thutmose III, engaging the rival empires of Mitanni and Hatti.^[69][71] Thutmose III led seventeen military campaigns, including victory at the Battle of Megiddo, which established Egyptian hegemony over Syrian-Palestinian client principalities.^[69][71] Royal wealth poured into Thebes, transforming the cult of Amun-Re at Karnak into an economic entity that controlled vast tracts of agricultural land, fleets, and captive labor.^[69][72][73] New Kingdom monarchs ceased building pyramids, choosing instead to conceal their tombs in the arid Valley of the Kings on the west bank of Thebes, while erecting separate mortuary temples, known as Temples of Millions of Years, along the desert fringe.^[74][75][76]

Tensions between the crown and the wealthy Amun priesthood surfaced under Amenhotep II and Thutmose IV, who revitalized solar cults of Ra and the Aten.^[77][78] This tension escalated into the Amarna revolution under Amenhotep IV, who changed his name to Akhenaten, proscribed the cult of Amun, closed its temples, and moved the capital to the newly built city of Akhetaten (Amarna).^[79][80] Akhenaten promoted the exclusive worship of the sun disc Aten, composing royal hymns and serving as sole mediator for his subjects.^[80] The neglect of imperial diplomacy and domestic administration, documented in the Amarna Letters, triggered crises abroad, where Levantine territories fell to the Hittites.^[80] After Akhenaten's death, the court restored traditional religious practices under Tutankhamun and Ay, guided by General Horemheb, who dismantled Amarna monuments, excised Amarna rulers from official annals, and codified administrative reforms to restore fiscal order.^[80][81][82]

The Nineteenth Dynasty, founded by Ramesses I, derived from a military background.^[83] Seti I reasserted Egyptian control over Palestine and fortified the northern frontier, building a new administrative capital at Pi-Ramesses in the eastern Delta.^[69][83] His son Ramesses II fought the Hittites at the Battle of Kadesh in his fifth regnal year, culminating in regnal year 21 in the earliest surviving international peace treaty with Hattusili III.^[69][84][85] Ramesses II conducted extensive building projects, constructing the rock temples of Abu Simbel, the Ramesseum, and the great hypostyle hall at Karnak.^[69][84] Following his sixty-seven-year reign, succession crises emerged among his descendants: Merneptah fought off Libyan invaders, while rival factions backed Amenmesse, Seti II, Siptah, and Queen Twosret.^[86][87][88]

Order was restored by Setnakhte, who established the Twentieth Dynasty.^[89][90] His son Ramesses III repelled sea-borne and terrestrial assaults by the Sea Peoples in Year 8 and turned back Libyan invasions in Years 5 and 11.^[91][92] Despite these successes, institutional decay accelerated. In regnal year 29, artisans excavating royal tombs at Deir el-Medina staged the earliest recorded labor strike in response to delayed wages, a delay attributed to official corruption rather than a shortage of treasury revenue; at the time, Vizier Ta held the vizierates of both Upper and Lower Egypt.^[91][92] Ramesses III was assassinated in a palace plot organized by Queen Tiye to install her son Pentawere.^[93] Successive rulers from Ramesses IV to Ramesses XI faced mounting inflation, grain shortages, Libyan raids, and pervasive tomb robberies in the Theban necropolis.^[94][95] In Upper Egypt, the High Priests of Amun assumed monarchical authority, and under Ramesses XI, High Priest Herihor governed the south autonomously, dating documents to a 'Renaissance' era (Wehem Mesut) alongside the pharaoh's formal reign.^[96][97][98]

Third Intermediate Period and Foreign Dynasties

Following the death of Ramesses XI in 1069 BCE, Egypt divided into two political realms, beginning the Third Intermediate Period.^[98][99] In the north, Smendes founded the Twenty-first Dynasty at Tanis, while the south was governed from Thebes by military High Priests of Amun.^{[98][99][100]} Ties between both centres were maintained through intermarriage; Pinedjem I, a Theban high priest, placed his sons Psusennes I and Menkheperre in positions of royal and ecclesiastical power.^[99] To secure royal remains from tomb robbers, the Theban priesthood gathered New Kingdom royal mummies and reburied them in hidden collective caches, including the tomb of Inhapi at Deir el-Bahari (TT320) and the tomb of Amenhotep II (KV35).^{[98][101][102]}

Around 945 BCE, Sheshonq I, a chieftain of the Libyan Meshwesh community, established the Twenty-second Dynasty at Bubastis.^[103][104] Sheshonq consolidated control by appointing his son Iuput as High Priest of Amun and military commander of Upper Egypt.^[104] He launched a major military campaign into Palestine, sacking towns in Judah and Israel, an event recorded in the Karnak inscriptions and commemorated on a victory stela at Megiddo.^{[103][104][105]} During the ninth century BCE, dynastic rivalries split the Delta among competitive lineages, establishing concurrent Twenty-third and Twenty-fourth Dynasties in an era of political fragmentation termed the 'Libyan anarchy'.^[103][106]

Taking advantage of northern disunity, the Kushite king Piye marched north from Napata around 730 BCE, subduing local dynasts and establishing the Twenty-fifth Dynasty.^{[107][108][109]} The Nubian pharaohs, including Shabaka, Shebitku, and Taharqa, embraced Egyptian religious traditions, reviving Old Kingdom artistic styles, building monuments at Memphis and Karnak, and installing royal daughters such as Amenirdis I as the God's Wife of Amun in Thebes.^[107][109] In 671 BCE, the Neo-Assyrian king Esarhaddon invaded Egypt, capturing Memphis and driving Taharqa south into Nubia.^[107][110] A second Assyrian campaign under Ashurbanipal in 663 BCE defeated Tanutamun and plundered Thebes, ending Nubian rule in Egypt.^[107][110]

Saite Renaissance and Persian Conquests

The Saite Twenty-sixth Dynasty was founded by Psamtik I, who leveraged an alliance with Carian and Ionian Greek mercenaries to expel Assyrian garrisons and dissolve regional Delta chiefdoms.^[111][112] He secured Upper Egypt by having his daughter Nitocris adopted by Shepenwepet II as God's Wife of Amun.^[111][112] The Saite era witnessed an archaizing cultural renaissance, with scribes and sculptors deliberately copying artistic forms and texts from the Old and Middle Kingdoms.^[113] Necho II intervened in the Levant, defeating Josiah of Judah at Megiddo in 609 BCE before suffering defeat against Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon at the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE.^[112][113] Psamtik II campaigned into Nubia in 592 BCE, while his successor Apries was overthrown in a civil war by his general Amasis II, who governed during forty-four years of commercial prosperity.^[112][113]

In 525 BCE, the Achaemenid Persian king Cambyses II invaded Egypt, defeating Psamtik III at the Battle of Pelusium and establishing the Twenty-seventh Dynasty.^{[112][114][115]} Persian emperors including Darius I adopted pharaonic titles and sponsored Egyptian temple construction, but native rebellions erupted repeatedly.^[116][117] In 404 BCE, Amyrtaeus of Sais led a revolt that liberated Egypt, establishing the brief Twenty-eighth Dynasty.^[114][118] Native sovereignty continued through the Twenty-ninth Dynasty at Mendes and the Thirtieth Dynasty from Sebennytos.^[118][119] Nectanebo I (380–362 BCE) drove back the Persians and actively carried out building projects in Egypt, while Nectanebo II (360–343 BCE) was defeated by Artaxerxes III in 343 BCE.^[118][119] Nectanebo II fled to Nubia, ending rule by indigenous Egyptian pharaohs.^[118][119]

Ptolemaic and Roman Periods

In 332 BCE, Alexander the Great occupied Egypt without armed resistance from the Persian satrap Mazaces.^[27][120] Alexander travelled to the Siwa Oasis, where the oracle of Ammon hailed him as the son of the god and legitimate pharaoh.^[120] Following Alexander's death in 323 BCE, his general Ptolemy, son of Lagos, took control of the country, declaring himself king in 305 BCE as Ptolemy I Soter and founding the Ptolemaic Dynasty.^[27][120] While the Ptolemies ruled from Alexandria as Greek Hellenistic monarchs, they presented themselves to the Egyptian population as pharaohs, adopting traditional fivefold titularies, funding temples at Edfu, Dendera, Kom Ombo, and Philae, and granting tax immunities to the native priesthood.^[120][121] Regional revolts broke out; under Ptolemy IV and Ptolemy V, Upper Egypt seceded for two decades under indigenous pharaohs Horwennefer and Ankhwennefer.^[120]

Ptolemaic rule ended under Cleopatra VII, who engaged in diplomatic alliances with Julius Caesar and Mark Antony.^{[27][120][122]} Following their defeat by Octavian at the Battle of Actium in 31 BCE, Cleopatra committed suicide, and Caesarion (Ptolemy XV) was executed in 30 BCE.^{[27][120][122]} Egypt was incorporated into the Roman Empire as a province administered by an equestrian prefect.^[122][123] Roman emperors, beginning with Augustus, assumed traditional pharaonic iconography and titles on Egyptian temple walls, depicted offering Maat to native deities, though they never underwent traditional coronations at Memphis.^{[123][124][125]} The practice of portraying Roman rulers as pharaohs in temple reliefs persisted until the reign of Emperor Maximinus Daza in the early fourth century CE, after which Christianity supplanted traditional pharaonic kingship.^{[125][126][127]}

Nature of Kingship and Divinity

The nature of the pharaoh's divinity was dual, combining a mortal human biology with an immortal divine office.^[128][129] Mid-twentieth-century Egyptology frequently viewed the king as an outright god on earth, but subsequent analyses demonstrate that divinity attached primarily to the royal office rather than to the individual person.^{[38][129][130]} In ritual texts, living pharaohs were consistently designated netjer nefer (nṯr nfr), conventionally translated as 'good god' or 'perfect god', but interpreted by Egyptologist Jaromír Málek as 'younger god' or 'junior god', in contrast to netjer aa (nṯr ꜥꜣ), 'great god', a title reserved for the primordial deities of the cosmos.^[130] The king served as a mortal vessel for the eternal royal Ka (ka nesout), the divine creative life force transmitted through the coronation ritual when the monarch mounted the throne of Horus.^[38][131]

The Divine Office and the Two Natures

Royal ideology explained the monarch's divine parentage through the theological doctrine of theogamy.^{[128][132][133]} Under this doctrine, when the creator deity Amun-Re sought to produce an heir to the throne, he took the physical form of the reigning king to impregnate the Great Royal Wife, ensuring that the successor inherited divine blood.^{[132][133][134]} Reliefs depicting this divine conception and birth survive in the mortuary temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari and the temple of Luxor for Amenhotep III.^[135][136] In earthly life, the living monarch was the incarnation of the falcon Horus; upon physical death, the deceased pharaoh underwent osirianisation, merging into Osiris to rule the underworld, while his successor assumed the role of Horus on the earthly throne.^{[46][48][137]}

The relationship between the king's human fallibility and divine responsibilities is explored in Middle Kingdom didactic literature, such as the Instruction of Amenemhat I for His Son and the Loyalist Teaching from the Twelfth Dynasty.^[57][60] These works portray the royal office as an exacting craft requiring vigilance, caution against disloyal courtiers, and dedication to the welfare of subjects.^[57] Unlike later despotisms such as the Achaemenid and Seleucid monarchies, the Egyptian king did not hold supreme moral authority; his actions were expected to serve the good of society and the upholding of Maat, and this was what justified his power.^[138][139] Self-laudatory stelae underscored royal beneficence, citing achievements such as eliminating famine, distributing grain, and preserving peace.^[138]

Maat and the Role of the King

The central principle of pharaonic governance was expressed by the maxim: 'Bring Maat and repel Isfet'.^{[140][141][142]} Maat represented cosmic order, truth, balance, and justice, established by the creator god at the beginning of time, while isfet encompassed chaos, violence, falsehood, and rebellion.^{[140][141][143]} The pharaoh acted as the earthly guarantor of Maat, preserving harmony between gods, nature, and humanity.^{[141][144][145]} When the ruler governed justly, the deities reciprocated by maintaining cosmic stability, regular seasonal cycles, and fertile Nile inundations.^{[142][144][146]} Periods of famine, foreign invasion, and social collapse were interpreted in prophetic literature, such as the Admonitions of Ipuwer and the Prophecy of Neferti, as consequences of the breakdown of royal authority and the triumph of isfet.^{[147][148][149]}

Although the pharaoh possessed absolute legislative and judicial authority, his power was theoretically constrained by Maat.^{[143][150][151]} If a monarch failed to sustain Maat through negligence or impiety, historical memory judged him harshly; later traditions cast rulers such as Khufu and Khafre as oppressive despots who closed temples and exploited their populations.^[149][152] The Demotic Chronicle of the Ptolemaic period attributes the fall of some Late Period rulers to their failure to satisfy the gods, and some kings, such as Setnakhte, openly justified taking power by the illegitimacy of their predecessors; the birth of the founder of a new dynasty could be seen as the punishment for a king who failed to uphold Maat.^{[149][153][154]}

The Sed Festival and Renewal Rituals

Because the pharaoh was subject to biological aging, rituals were staged to revitalize his physical strength and renew his divine mandate.^[46][155] The principal jubilee was the Heb-Sed (Sed festival), traditionally celebrated in the thirtieth year of a monarch's reign and repeated at two- to three-year intervals thereafter.^[155] The festival has prehistoric antecedents, possibly related to an archaic practice where aging tribal chieftains who could no longer defend their communities were ritually replaced. The Sed ritual incorporated the 'dedication of the field', wherein the pharaoh, dressed in a short kilt and carrying a flail, ran a course between two boundary markers representing the northern and southern borders of Egypt to demonstrate his physical vitality and territorial claim.^[156]

The central mystery of the Heb-Sed involved the renewal of the coronation in a ceremonial pavilion known in hieroglyphic script as the tjentjat, comprising two adjoining raised platforms.^[157] The pharaoh underwent a dual enthronement, first as king of Upper Egypt wearing the White Crown and then as king of Lower Egypt wearing the Red Crown.^[157] Throughout the ceremonies, the ruler wore a short, tight-fitting ceremonial robe resembling an Osirian burial shroud, represented in colossal Osiride pillars within Middle and New Kingdom mortuary temples at Deir el-Bahari, Luxor, and the Ramesseum.^[158] Inscriptions on these pillars, such as 'First time of the Sed-festival; may he be granted life like Ra forever', commemorated the monarch's mystical rebirth and renewed union with his divine Ka.^[158]

Annual renewal rituals complemented the Sed festival. Liturgical texts preserved in Brooklyn Museum Papyrus 47.218.50 document the Confirmation of Royal Power at the New Year, conducted over fifteen days between the five epagomenal days and the 9th of Thout, coinciding with the arrival of the Nile flood.^[159][160] In this rite, the king or his priestly deputy underwent purification in the House of Life, received protective amulets of ankh ('life') and was ('power'), and was anointed nine times with prophylactic unguents to repel the wrath of Sekhmet and demons of Bastet. In a magical ritual, the sign iaout ('royal office') was written on the king's hand and prepared in chewed bread for the ruler to ingest, symbolically embedding the office in his physical body. The preceding year was buried as a clay cake wrapped in river silt, while four royal seals were placed beneath the king's head as he simulated death, awakening at dawn on New Year's Day renewed and reconfirmed.

Royal Titulary and Names

In ancient Egyptian thought, the royal name was an ideological program and a creative magical force that made the pharaoh's presence manifest.^{[129][161][162]} An anonymous statue was inconceivable, as erasing a ruler's cartouches amounted to destroying his existence in both this world and the afterlife.^[162] By the Middle Kingdom, the official royal titulary had evolved into a standardized fivefold sequence of names, each expressing distinct political and theological aspects of kingship.^{[129][162][163]}

The Fivefold Titulary

The Horus name was the earliest title, appearing before the First Dynasty.^[37][164] It was written inside a rectangular frame termed a serekh, which represented the facade of the royal palace topped by a Horus falcon.^[34][164] The serekh identified the monarch as the earthly manifestation of Horus dwelling within the seat of power.^[164] The earliest attested example dates to King Ka in the Predynastic Period.^[37] Early Horus names reflected martial strength or divine association, such as Aha ('Horus the Fighter') and Djer ('Horus the Strong'), while later names expressed political reconciliation, such as Khasekhemwy ('Horus: The Two Powers are at Peace').^[40][164]

The Nebty ('Two Ladies') name was introduced under Hor-Aha and formalized under Den.^[34][164] It linked the monarch to the tutelary goddesses of the unified realm: the vulture Nekhbet of Elkab in Upper Egypt and the cobra Wadjet of Buto in Lower Egypt, each perched on a basket representing the neb sign ('lord').^[164] The Golden Horus name, first used by Djoser, depicted a falcon perched above the hieroglyph for gold (nbw).^[164][165] Egyptologists associate this title with the incorruptibility and eternity of the gods' bodies, solar rays, or Horus's mythical triumph over Set in Nubt (Naqada).^[164]

The prenomen (nsw-bjtj, 'King of Upper and Lower Egypt', literally 'He of the Sedge and the Bee') was introduced under Den and became the principal official name used in royal annals, administrative decrees, and foreign correspondence.^{[129][162][164]} While traditionally translated as a geopolitical title, the sedge (nswt) symbolized the permanent divine office of kingship, while the bee (bjtj) represented the ephemeral, mortal individual holding that office, expressing the monarch's dual nature.^[129][166] The nomen, introduced regularly under the Fifth Dynasty, was the personal birth name given to the prince, preceded by the title Sa-Ra ('Son of Ra').^{[46][167][168]} Beginning in the Fourth Dynasty under Sneferu and Djedefre, both the prenomen and nomen were enclosed within a cartouche (shenu), an elongated protective loop of double rope tied with a knot, symbolizing eternal protection over the ruler's name across all the sun encircled.^{[46][169][170]}

Pseudotitles and Epithets

Beside the five canonical names, pharaonic inscriptions incorporated formal supplementary epithets known as pseudotitles.^[21][171] These included Neb-tawy ('Lord of the Two Lands'), Neb-khau ('Lord of Appearances' or 'Lord of Crowns'), and Neb-khepesh ('Lord of the Strong Arm').^[21][167] The title Hem ('Servant' or 'Person', traditionally translated as 'Majesty') frequently appeared in narrative accounts and royal decrees in phrases such as hem-ef ('his Majesty').^[10][21] During the Amarna Period, Akhenaten incorporated the distinctive theological formula Ankh-em-Maat ('Living in Truth') directly after his Nesu-bity title before his prenomen cartouche. Royal inscriptions also concluded with formulaic blessings such as ankh, wedja, seneb ('may he live, prosper, and be healthy') or di ankh djed was mi Ra djet ('given life, stability, and dominion like Ra forever').^[1]

Regalia and Insignia

The pharaoh's royal status was materialized through regalia endowed with protective and symbolic meaning.^{[46][172][173]} Regalia served as amulets designed to protect the king from supernatural and terrestrial enemies while identifying him with cosmic deities in temple ritual.^[173] Public protocol required that the sovereign never appear with his head uncovered, wearing instead specific crowns, diadems, or headdresses corresponding to different ceremonial contexts.^[173][174]

Crowns and Headdresses

The Deshret, or Red Crown, was a tall, cylindrical headdress with a curling projection at the front, symbolizing dominion over Lower Egypt.^[173][175] Predynastic representations include a depiction on a potsherd from Naqada and on the Narmer Macehead and Palette. The Hedjet, or White Crown, was a tall, conical, bulbous headdress representing Upper Egypt, worn by Predynastic kings including Scorpion II and Narmer.^[176] Following political unification, the two crowns were combined into the Pschent (Sekhemty, 'The Two Powerful Ones'), which placed the White Crown inside the Red Crown to signify dominion over the unified Two Lands.^[173][177] The earliest certain evidence for the combined Pschent dates to King Den of the First Dynasty.^[164]

Daily ritual and military headdresses included the Nemes, a striped linen cloth draped over the crown of the head, secured with a band, and tied at the nape of the neck with two pleated lappets falling over the shoulders.^[164][173] Known from the Third Dynasty statue of Djoser in his Saqqara serdab, the Nemes remained the most widespread royal headdress through Roman times, famously preserved on the golden mask of Tutankhamun.^[164] The Khat was an unpleated headcloth tied into a bag-like ponytail at the back, attested under Den and recurring under Djoser. The Khepresh, or Blue Crown, was a leather or cloth cap studded with gold sequins, introduced in the New Kingdom and worn during religious festivals, coronation rites, and military campaigns.^[173] Ritual crowns included the Atef, a feathered White Crown associated with Osiris, and the Hemhem, a triple Atef resting on spiralled ram horns.

Despite hundreds of artistic depictions in relief and sculpture, no intact ancient Egyptian crown has ever been discovered in archaeological excavations.^[174][178] The intact burial of Tutankhamun contained diadems, scepters, and ceremonial jewelry, but no Red, White, or Double Crown.^[178] Egyptologist Bob Brier has argued that royal crowns were state and religious property endowed with dangerous magical potency rather than personal possessions of the monarch; upon a pharaoh's death, the crowns were inherited by his successor rather than placed in the royal tomb.^[174][179]

Scepters, Staves, and Other Emblems

Scepters and staves were primary emblems of administrative and divine authority.^[172][173] The most enduring royal insignia was the heqa (crook), a short cane with a hooked upper end derived from a shepherd's staff.^[173][180] The earliest archaeological example was found in a Predynastic tomb at Abydos dating to Naqada III.^[180] It symbolized the ruler's responsibility to guide and protect his people.^[57][173] The heqa was paired with the nekhekh (flail), a short rod terminating in three beaded lash-like pendants derived from agricultural tools, symbolizing punitive authority and judicial discipline.^[173][181] Together, the crook and flail were held crossed over the chest in depictions of Osiris and mummified monarchs.

The was-scepter was a tall staff with a straight shaft, a stylized animal head at the top, and a forked lower end, representing power and divine dominion in the hands of both kings and deities.^[180] First Dynasty stone vessels show Anedjib carrying the mks-staff.^[182] Other royal regalia included the uraeus (iaret), an erect spitting cobra positioned on the forehead of crowns and diadems, representing the goddess Wadjet protecting the pharaoh by spitting venom or fire at enemies.^[173][183] The ceremonial false beard was a braided, artificial beard fastened under the chin with straps, associating the pharaoh with Osiris.^[173] In her iconography Hatshepsut bore all the male attributes of the royal office, such as the false beard, the kilt and the crown.^[184] Additional royal vestments included the shendyt (a pleated royal kilt), a bull's or lion's tail attached to the belt to signify virility, and ceremonial sandals adorned with images of bound foreign captives trampled beneath the royal feet.^[173]

Functions and Governance

The pharaoh operated as the institutional centre of the ancient Egyptian state, uniting executive, legislative, judicial, and religious authority in a political model that rejected separation of powers.^{[145][185][186]} All administrative officials, provincial governors, and military commanders exercised delegated authority in the name of the sovereign.^[145]

Supreme Priest

The pharaoh was the high priest of every temple across Egypt and the sole human theoretically authorized to enter the inner sanctuary to interact directly with the cult statue of a deity.^{[144][153][186]} Temple wall scenes across all dynasties depicted the pharaoh performing the daily temple ritual: waking the cult statue, purifying it with water and natron, dressing it in sacred linen, anointing it with unguents, and presenting food and incense offerings.^[46][186] In practice, the monarch delegated daily service to appointed priests, who served as royal deputies.^{[46][153][186]} Until the New Kingdom there was no professional priesthood, except perhaps for funerary priests, and local dignitaries took up temple service in the king's name by virtue of their administrative offices.^[153] The central ritual act was the offering of Maat, in which the pharaoh presented a statuette of the goddess Maat to the deity, symbolizing the return of cosmic order in exchange for divine blessings and prosperity.^[146]

Commander-in-Chief and Warrior

As commander-in-chief of the military, the pharaoh defended Egypt's borders against foreign incursions and internal rebellion.^{[185][187][188]} In religious ideology, foreign enemies were manifestations of primordial chaos (isfet) associated with the serpent Apophis, while the pharaoh represented Ra triumphing over disruption.^[187] The standard motif of the warrior king was the 'smiting of the enemy', first depicted on Predynastic knife handles and the Narmer Palette and repeated through Roman times: the pharaoh stood with upraised mace, grasping kneeling foreign captives by the hair.^[187][189] During the New Kingdom, the royal warrior image evolved to show the king standing in a two-wheeled war chariot, firing arrows into fleeing enemies, as depicted on temple pylons at Karnak, Luxor, the Ramesseum, and Medinet Habu.^[189]

Lawgiver and Administrator

The pharaoh was the sole legislative source of law, promulgating legal codes (hepou) and royal decrees (oudjou nesout).^{[151][188][190]} These decrees addressed administrative appointments, tax exemptions for specific temple estates, the commissioning of mining expeditions, public construction works, and royal funerary endowments.^[190] Decrees were inscribed on stelae, announced to provincial officials, and filed in central archives under the supervision of the vizier (tjaty).^[190] Ancient Egypt possessed no separate judicial branch; administrative officials heard lawsuits and enforced decrees as part of their official duties.^[151][191] In legal disputes, defendants and witnesses swore oaths by the life of the pharaoh (ankh en netjer); perjury was considered treason and was punishable by death or mutilation.^[191] Capital sentences required direct royal confirmation, as did treason trials arising from palace conspiracies.^[191]

Provider and Economic Steward

As the symbolic father of the people, the pharaoh was responsible for ensuring agricultural prosperity.^[26][192] The Egyptian economy depended entirely on the annual Nile inundation beginning in June.^[26][192] Egyptians did not view the king as controlling the flood directly, but as an intermediary whose piety secured the favor of the deities, particularly Hapy, the personification of the inundation.^[192][193] During the inundation season, the pharaoh led riverine rituals, casting offerings of bread, fruits, flowers, and statuettes into the river.^[193] If floods failed and drought struck, the king opened royal granaries to relieve regional starvation, as commemorated in royal inscriptions and literature.^[138][193] The crown nominally owned all agricultural land and collected grain taxes, distributing grain to support the bureaucracy, artisanal centers, temple personnel, and state building projects.^[185][188]

Royal Court and Family

The royal harem, home to the Great Royal Wife, the secondary wives and the royal children, was an institution parallel to and independent of the royal administration.^[194]

Marriage Practices and Royal Incest

Pharaohs practiced endogamous and incestuous marriages to an extent found in few other ancient societies.^[195][196] While full-sibling marriage occurred among ordinary populations in Roman-era Fayum, in the Pharaonic Period it was largely restricted to the royal family.^[197][198] Full-brother-sister unions mirrored mythological relationships, such as those of Osiris and Isis or Geb and Nut.^[199][200] In the Old Kingdom, sibling marriage is attested in the Fourth and Sixth Dynasties; in the New Kingdom, Akhenaten married his full sister (the 'Younger Lady' of KV35), fathering Tutankhamun, who later married his half-sister Ankhesenamun.^{[197][198][200]} Father-daughter unions also occurred: Pepi I married two sisters, Ankhesenpepi I and Ankhesenpepi II; Amenhotep III married his daughter Sitamun; and Ramesses II ritually married several of his daughters, including Bintanath, Meritamen, and Nebettawy.^[201][202] Anthropologists and Egyptologists interpret royal incest as a ritual mechanism of inversion that distinguished the monarch from ordinary social lineages, identifying the royal house with primordial creative deities.^[195][203]

Royal succession favored patrilineal primogeniture, where the crown passed from father to eldest surviving son, reflecting the relationship between Osiris and Horus.^[204][205] However, high infant mortality required flexibility; if the Great Royal Wife bore no surviving male heir, the son of a secondary wife or concubine could ascend the throne, often reinforcing his legitimacy by marrying a daughter of the Great Royal Wife.^[200][206] If a direct line ended, succession passed to a collateral male relative, such as a younger brother, or to a powerful general backed by the military and priesthood, as occurred with Horemheb, Ramesses I, and Setnakhte.^{[82][83][207]}

The Great Royal Wife and Royal Women

The chief consort held the title of Hemet Nesut Weret ('Great Royal Wife').^{[200][208][209]} While the pharaoh practiced polygamy, maintaining concubines and minor wives, the Great Royal Wife played an indispensable religious and dynastic role.^[200][209] In the New Kingdom, she was identified with Hathor and Mut, wearing a vulture headdress and occasionally the two tall feathers of the Shuty crown, functioning as the earthly partner of Amun-Re who provoked the god's creative energies.^[209] Prominent consorts exercised substantial political influence: Queen Ahhotep I rallied troops during the wars against the Hyksos; Ahmose-Nefertari was venerated as the ancestral matriarch of the Eighteenth Dynasty and the first holder of the endowed priestly office God's Wife of Amun; Tiye participated in foreign correspondence under Amenhotep III; Nefertiti was depicted smiting foreign enemies alongside Akhenaten; and Nefertari received an elaborately painted tomb in the Valley of the Queens and a dedicated rock temple at Abu Simbel alongside Ramesses II.^[209][210]

Female Rulers

Although kingship was conceptually male, defined by the masculine solar deity Ra and the falcon Horus, women occasionally exercised monarchical rule in their own right, particularly during dynastic crises when direct male lines failed.^{[184][211][212]} According to the historian Manetho, the Egyptians accepted that a woman could become pharaoh during the reign of Nynetjer, the third pharaoh of the Second Dynasty.^[213] As far as is known, four women became pharaoh: Sobekneferu, whose reign ended the Twelfth Dynasty and lasted three years and ten months according to the Turin Royal Canon; Hatshepsut of the Eighteenth Dynasty; Neferneferuaten (Ankhkheperure), probably a queen of uncertain identity who succeeded Akhenaten and is thought to have reigned three years; and Twosret, whose reign closed the Nineteenth Dynasty.^{[62][184][214][215][216][217]} Nitocris, described by Herodotus and Manetho as an Old Kingdom queen who avenged her murdered brother before committing suicide, is considered by modern Egyptologists to be a Greek misunderstanding of the male Sixth Dynasty king Netjerkare.^{[53][218][219]}

The most successful female ruler was Hatshepsut (reigned c. 1478–1458 BCE).^[214] Initially acting as regent for her infant stepson and nephew Thutmose III, she assumed full pharaonic titularies in Year 7 of his reign.^[214] She legitimized her rule by having reliefs carved at Deir el-Bahari depicting her divine conception by Amun-Re and her formal coronation by her father Thutmose I.^[135][214] In public sculpture and inscriptions, she adopted masculine royal titles, wore the shendyt kilt, the Nemes headdress, and the ceremonial false beard.^[184] Her reign was characterized by diplomatic missions, economic trade to Punt, and architectural restoration at Karnak and Deir el-Bahari.^[214] Decades after her death, Thutmose III and Amenhotep II systematically excised her cartouches and dismantled her statues, attempting to erase her memory from official king lists.^[214][220]

The Royal Harem and Education

The royal harem, designated the ipet-nesout ('royal apartments') or per khener ('house of seclusion'), was an extensive, self-governing economic institution rather than merely a domestic residence.^[194] Operating in major royal cities such as Thebes, Memphis, Akhetaten, and Faiyum sites like Medinet Gurob (Mer-Our), the harem housed the Great Royal Wife, secondary wives, foreign princesses, royal children, widowed queens, and attendant ladies-in-waiting.^[194][221] It possessed its own administrative staff of male scribes, stewards, and security personnel, managing extensive agricultural estates, cattle herds, weaving workshops, and fisheries.^[194][221] Harem textile workshops operated industrially, producing high-grade linen for the palace, priesthood, and export.^[194]

The harem functioned as an educational center for royal princes, who were raised alongside the children of prominent nobles and foreign vassal rulers in the Kep (the palace school).^[222] These classmates, titled 'foster brothers of the King' (sen-menay), formed an administrative and military network that provided lifelong support to the monarch.^[222][223] However, the concentration of rival mothers and princes rendered the harem vulnerable to succession intrigues.^[91] Historical conspiracies resulted in the assassinations of Teti in the Sixth Dynasty, Amenemhat I in the Twelfth Dynasty (as described in the Story of Sinuhe), and Ramesses III in the Twentieth Dynasty, whose throat was severed during the Judicial Papyrus of Turin conspiracy orchestrated by Queen Tiye.^[93]

Diplomatic Marriages

From the Old Kingdom onward, Egyptian monarchs established diplomatic marriages with foreign courts to cement geopolitical alliances.^[224] Sahure married a princess of Byblos in the Fifth Dynasty, but diplomatic marital exchanges peaked during the New Kingdom, recorded in the cuneiform Amarna Letters.^[224][225] Thutmose III married three Syrian-Canaanite noblewomen: Menheta, Menwi, and Merti, whose shared tomb in the Wadi Gabbanat el-Qurud contained lavish gold and silver funerary goods.^[224] Thutmose IV married a daughter of Artatama I of Mitanni.^[225] Amenhotep III negotiated marriages with several foreign royal families: Gilukhepa of Mitanni arrived in his tenth regnal year with 317 female attendants; her niece Tadukhipa followed in Year 36; and he married both a sister and a daughter of King Kadashman-Enlil I of Babylon.^[225] Ramesses II concluded his treaty with the Hittites by marrying Maathorneferure, the eldest daughter of King Hattusili III, in his thirty-fourth regnal year.^[226] Diplomatic marriages were asymmetrical; foreign rulers routinely sent daughters to the pharaoh's harem, but Egyptian kings refused requests to send Egyptian princesses abroad, asserting that 'from of old, no daughter of the king of Egypt is given to anyone'.^[225]

Funerary Traditions and Tombs

Ancient Egyptian funerary architecture and beliefs developed to ensure the pharaoh's transition from mortal life into eternity.^{[44][46][227]} The royal tomb was viewed as a sacred threshold of rebirth where the physical body was preserved by mummification and transformed into an immortal divine spirit (akh) capable of joining the gods in the celestial sphere.^{[44][227][228]}

Mastabas and Pyramid Complexes

In the Early Dynastic Period, royal tombs at Abydos and Saqqara were mudbrick mastabas: rectangular, flat-roofed structures erected above subterranean burial chambers.^{[44][227][229]} In the Third Dynasty, Djoser transformed this architecture by superimposing six stone mastabas to create the Step Pyramid at Saqqara, designed by Imhotep, surrounded by courts for Sed festival rites.^{[44][227][229]} In the Fourth Dynasty, Sneferu engineered the smooth-sided pyramid, building the Meidum pyramid, the Bent Pyramid, and the Red Pyramid at Dahshur.^[44] His successors built the Giza complex: Khufu's Great Pyramid (147 metres), Khafre's pyramid (144 metres) with the Great Sphinx, and Menkaure's pyramid (66 metres).^[39][41][44] Standard pyramid complexes comprised five architectural components: the valley temple along the Nile canal, a covered stone causeway, a mortuary temple against the pyramid's eastern face, subsidiary queens' pyramids, and the main pyramid encasing the subterranean granite burial vault.^[44] In the Middle Kingdom, Twelfth Dynasty pharaohs built pyramids at Dahshur, Lisht, and Hawara with mudbrick cores encased in limestone, incorporating labyrinthine corridors and sliding portcullis blocks to thwart grave robbers.^[44]

Pyramid Texts and Funerary Literature

Beginning with Unas at the end of the Fifth Dynasty, the interior burial chambers and antechambers of pyramids were carved with the Pyramid Texts, the oldest body of religious writing in the world.^[48][49][50] Recorded in green or blue hieroglyphic script, these spells provided the deceased king with the magical knowledge required to navigate the perilous underworld, avoid malevolent demons, and ascend to the sky.^{[49][50][230]} The texts describe the pharaoh ascending on ladders, ropes, solar rays, or clouds, transforming into celestial falcons, herons, or smoke, and traveling across the heavens in the solar bark of Ra.^[230] In Utterance 571, the king's cosmic origin is proclaimed: 'the King was fashioned by his father Atum before the sky existed, before earth existed, before men existed'.^[231] The famous 'Cannibal Hymn' depicted the deceased monarch consuming the flesh and magic of the gods to absorb their cosmic powers.^[230] In the Middle Kingdom, these royal spells democratised into the Coffin Texts painted on the wooden coffins of provincial nobles, while in the New Kingdom they formed the basis for the Book of the Dead and underworld treatises such as the Amduat and the Book of Gates.^[56]

Theban Tombs and Memorial Temples

In the New Kingdom, pharaohs abandoned the pyramid format to protect royal burials from plundering, instituting a geographic division between the tomb and the memorial cult temple.^{[74][75][227]} Between Thutmose I and Ramesses XI, over sixty rock-cut tombs (hypogea) were excavated in the limestone cliffs of the Valley of the Kings on the west bank of Thebes.^[75][227] The tombs consisted of sloping corridors, pillared halls, and deep burial chambers painted with underworld scenes.^[75][227] The construction and decoration of these tombs were carried out by a dedicated community of artisans and scribes who resided in the walled village of Deir el-Medina.^[75]

The mortuary cult was practiced separately in monumental Temples of Millions of Years constructed along the cultivated desert edge, including the temples of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari, Amenhotep III (the Amenophium, guarded by the Colossi of Memnon), Ramesses II (the Ramesseum), and Ramesses III at Medinet Habu.^{[76][227][232]} These complexes served not only as centers for the posthumous worship of the pharaoh united with Osiris and Amun-Re, but also as active administrative estates that received grain shipments and staged public rituals, notably the annual Beautiful Feast of the Valley, in which the sacred barque of Amun visited each memorial temple across the necropolis.^[232]

Royal Mummies and Caches

During the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Dynasties, systemic tomb robberies devastated the Valley of the Kings.^{[95][98][101]} To safeguard royal remains, Theban high priests collected the damaged mummies of New Kingdom pharaohs, rewrapped them, inscribed their identities on linen dockets, and concealed them in collective hiding places.^[98][101] In 1871, the Abd el-Rassoul family of Qurna discovered the cache at Deir el-Bahari (TT320), containing over fifty royal mummies, including Seqenenre Tao, Ahmose I, Thutmose I, Thutmose II, Thutmose III, Seti I, Ramesses II, and Ramesses III, which Émile Brugsch and Gaston Maspero cleared in 1881.^[101] In 1898, Victor Loret discovered a second royal cache in the tomb of Amenhotep II, which held sixteen royal mummies in all, including Thutmose IV, Amenhotep III, Merneptah, Seti II, and Ramesses IV.^[233]

In November 1922, Howard Carter and Lord Carnarvon discovered the largely intact tomb of Tutankhamun (KV62) in the Valley of the Kings.^[227][234] The modest four-room hypogeum contained more than 5,000 artifacts, including gilded state chariots, beds, throne chairs, weapons, clothing, and regalia.^[234][235] Tutankhamun's body lay nested inside three anthropoid coffins, the innermost made of solid gold weighing over 110 kilograms; the coffins were enclosed within a quartzite sarcophagus and protected by four nested gilded wooden shrines inscribed with spells from the Book of the Dead and the Book of the Heavenly Cow.^[236] In the Third Intermediate Period, kings of the Twenty-first and Twenty-second Dynasties were interred within the precinct of the temple of Amun at Tanis, discovered by Pierre Montet between 1939 and 1946; Psusennes I's undisturbed silver coffin and solid gold burial mask represented one of the richest finds in Egyptian archaeology.^{[237][238][239]}

In modern times, scientific investigations and public events have highlighted royal mummies.^[240] On 3 April 2021, the Egyptian government staged the Pharaohs' Golden Parade through Cairo, transporting twenty-two royal mummies, eighteen kings and four queens, from the Egyptian Museum in Tahrir Square to the National Museum of Egyptian Civilization in Fustat in customized, gold-colored vehicles.^[240]

Historical Sources and King Lists

Knowledge of the chronological order and reigns of the pharaohs derives from monumental inscriptions, papyrological annals, and classical histories.^[25][241] Scribes and priests maintained records of past rulers to establish legitimate succession, perform ancestral rites, and calculate regnal dates, though these lists frequently excluded rulers deemed illegitimate, such as the Hyksos, Hatshepsut, and the Amarna kings (Akhenaten, Smenkhkare, Tutankhamun, and Ay).^{[241][242][243]}

The oldest surviving annalistic record is the Palermo Stone, an Old Kingdom diorite stela inscribed during the Fifth Dynasty, recording Predynastic rulers down to early Fifth Dynasty kings with details of annual flood levels, cattle censuses, and religious festivals.^[244] The Karnak King List, engraved on the walls of an Amun chapel under Thutmose III and now preserved in the Louvre, records sixty-one seated monarchs from the Old Kingdom through the Second Intermediate Period.^[245] The Abydos King List, located in the temple of Seti I, depicts Seti I and Crown Prince Ramesses offering homage to seventy-six royal cartouches starting with Menes.^[242] A second Abydos list from the temple of Ramesses II is held in the British Museum.^[246] The Saqqara Tablet, discovered in 1861 in the tomb of the royal scribe Tjunroy, records forty-seven surviving cartouches from Anedjib to Ramesses II.^[247] The most complete archival record is the Turin Royal Canon, a Nineteenth Dynasty hieratic papyrus listing more than three hundred royal names along with the exact duration of each reign in years, months, and days, though it suffered extensive fragmentation during shipment to Turin in the nineteenth century.^[248]

Classical Greek and Roman authors preserved pharaonic traditions, though often intermingled with folklore.^{[25][152][249]} Manetho's Aegyptiaca, compiled in the third century BCE, provided the foundational framework of thirty-one dynasties, establishing the Hellenized forms of royal names (such as Cheops for Khufu, Chephren for Khafre, and Sesostris for Senusret) that remain widely used in historical literature.^{[25][28][249]} Herodotus, in Book II of his Histories (Euterpe), documented fifth-century BCE oral accounts of Egyptian kings, contrasting the oppressive pyramid builders Cheops and Chephren with the pious Mykerinos, while recording the popular legend of King Rhampsinitus and the clever thief.^[152] Diodorus Siculus, writing in the first century BCE and drawing on Hecataeus of Abdera, is the only explicit classical Greek source to describe the pharaoh as divine, although in another passage he asserts that Darius I was the first ruler of Egypt to be honored as a king.^[116]

Reception and Cultural Legacy

The cultural memory of the pharaohs persisted across world literature, religious scriptures, and modern popular media.^[250] Within ancient Egyptian narrative literature, kings featured prominently as literary protagonists in texts such as the Story of Sinuhe (depicting Senusret I's magnanimity), the Westcar Papyrus (featuring Khufu listening to wonder-tales recounted by his sons), the Prophecy of Neferti (depicting Sneferu receiving warnings of political collapse), and the Tale of the Two Brothers.^{[251][252][253][254]}

Biblical and Classical Perspectives

In the Hebrew Bible, several historical pharaohs of the first millennium BCE are recorded by name.^[105][255] In 1 Kings and 2 Chronicles, Sheshonq I appears as Shishak (Sisaq), who sheltered Jeroboam and later invaded Judah during the reign of Rehoboam, stripping Jerusalem and the Temple of Solomon of their gold treasures.^{[105][256][257]} In 2 Kings 17:4, King Hoshea of Israel attempted an alliance with King 'So' of Egypt, generally identified as an abbreviation for Osorkon IV.^[258][259] Taharqa of the Twenty-fifth Dynasty is mentioned in 2 Kings 19:9 and Isaiah 37:9 as Tirhakah, king of Cush, during the Assyrian siege of Jerusalem by Sennacherib.^{[258][260][261]} Necho II is cited in 2 Kings 23:29 and 2 Chronicles 35:20–24 for defeating and slaying King Josiah of Judah at Megiddo in 609 BCE.^{[262][263][264]} Apries appears in Jeremiah 44:30 as Pharaoh Hophra, whose downfall to his enemies is prophesied.^[265]

In classical and medieval legend, the pharaoh became a mythic figure.^[266][267] Greek myths featured the tyrannical Egyptian king Busiris, said to sacrifice all visiting foreigners to Zeus until he was slain by Heracles at the altar.^[266] The Alexander Romance, attributed to Pseudo-Callisthenes and widely translated in medieval Europe, claimed that Alexander the Great was the illegitimate son of the last native pharaoh, Nectanebo II, who allegedly escaped to Macedon as an astrologer-mage and impregnated Queen Olympias under the guise of the god Ammon.^{[119][267][268]}

In rabbinic literature, the biblical pharaoh was portrayed as the archetype of hubristic blasphemy.^[269][270] In texts such as the Mekhilta of Rabbi Ishmael, Genesis Rabbah, and Exodus Rabbah, the pharaoh is categorized alongside Sennacherib and Nebuchadnezzar as a ruler who claimed personal divinity.^{[269][270][271]} Midrashic traditions depict Pharaoh boasting that he was the creator and master of the Nile; the plague of frogs is described as a divine response that contested his ownership of the river.^[270] The Tanhuma commentary on Ezekiel 29:9 mocks the ruler's claims of supreme godhood by recounting that his mortality was demonstrated because he had to go to the Nile each morning to relieve himself.^[272]

Islamic Tradition

In Islamic tradition, the term Fir'awn (فرعون) occurs seventy-four times across twenty-seven surahs in the Qur'an.^[273][274] It is used as a personal title specifically referring to the tyrannical ruler who opposed Moses and enslaved the Children of Israel, in contrast to Surah Yusuf, which designates the righteous Egyptian ruler of Joseph's era as al-Malik ('the King').^{[19][274][275]} Classical commentators (tafsir) and historians such as al-Tabari and al-Mas'udi discussed the pharaoh's identity, with some accounts suggesting he was of Amalekite origin or named Walid ibn Mus'ab.^[275] The Qur'anic narrative recounts Fir'awn commanding the slaughter of male Hebrew infants, proclaiming his supreme divinity ('I am your Lord Most High'), and drowning in the Red Sea when pursuing Moses.^{[274][275][276]} Surah Yunus (10:90–92) notes that Fir'awn attempted deathbed repentance as the waters closed over him, but was rejected, with his physical corpse preserved as a warning sign for future generations.^[275][276] Islamic theologians, including the Mu'tazilites and Sufi mystics such as al-Hallaj, examined Fir'awn as an allegorical figure representing absolute arrogance, unrepentant tyranny, and the spiritual dangers of ego-worship.^[275]

Modern Culture and the Exodus Narrative

Modern popular culture has extensively associated the pharaoh with the Exodus narrative.^[277][278] Because the biblical Book of Exodus names neither the pharaoh of the oppression nor the pharaoh of the departure, scholars have debated historical candidates, proposing Ahmose I, Thutmose III, Amenhotep II, Akhenaten, Ramesses II, and Merneptah, while Egyptologist Rolf Krauss proposed the Nineteenth Dynasty usurper Amenmesse.^[277] Although no archaeological or contemporaneous Egyptian text links Ramesses II to the biblical events, Western mass media solidified him as the archetypal Exodus antagonist.^[278] This motif was popularized in cinema by Cecil B. DeMille's 1923 and 1956 epic films The Ten Commandments, the latter starring Yul Brynner as Ramesses II opposite Charlton Heston as Moses.^[278] Subsequent films reproduced this confrontation, including DreamWorks' 1998 animated feature The Prince of Egypt and Ridley Scott's 2014 film Exodus: Gods and Kings.^[278]

Historical fiction and cinema have explored pharaonic Egypt beyond the biblical tradition.^[279][280] Michael Curtiz's 1954 film The Egyptian adapted Mika Waltari's 1945 novel Sinuhe the Egyptian, depicting Akhenaten and Horemheb through the eyes of a physician.^[279] Howard Hawks's 1955 film Land of the Pharaohs dramatised the construction of the Great Pyramid of Khufu.^[281] In 1966, Polish director Jerzy Kawalerowicz adapted Bolesław Prus's 1897 novel Pharaoh into an Academy Award-nominated film that portrayed the political struggles between a fictional reformist Ramesses XIII and the conservative priesthood of Amun.^[282] In literature, Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz published Khufu's Wisdom (The Curse of Ra, 1939) and Rhadopis of Nubia (1943), while French novelist and Egyptologist Christian Jacq produced multi-volume historical series, including Ramsès (1995–1996) and The Black Pharaoh (1997).^[280] In twentieth-century political discourse, 'pharaonism' emerged as a nationalist ideology celebrating Egypt's ancient pre-Islamic identity, while critics used 'pharaoh' pejoratively to denote authoritarian leaders, notably during the presidency of Hosni Mubarak.^[283][284] Concurrently, the moniker 'The Pharaohs' serves as the affectionate nickname for the Egyptian national football team.^[285]

References

1. A. Gardiner, Ancient Egyptian Grammar (3rd ed., 1957), 71–76.
2. « Pharaon », dans le Dictionnaire de l'Académie française, Centre national de ressources textuelles et lexicales (sens 1) [consulté le 21 octobre 2017].
3. Informations lexicographiques et étymologiques de « pharaon » (sens A) dans le Trésor de la langue française informatisé, sur le site du Centre national de ressources textuelles et lexicales [consulté le 21 octobre 2017].
4. 松本 (1994), p. 237. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプト文字手帳』株式会社 弥呂久、1994年。ISBN 4946482075。)
5. Hieratic Papyrus from Kahun and Gurob, F. LL. Griffith, 38, 17.
6. スペンサー (2009), p. 90. (A.J.スペンサー 著、近藤 二郎, 小林 朋則 訳『大英博物館 図説古代エジプト史』原書房、2009年。ISBN 978-4-562-04289-0。)
7. Petrie, W. M. (William Matthew Flinders); Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry); Griffith, F. Ll (Francis Llewellyn) (1891). Illahun, Kahun and Gurob : 1889–1890. Cornell University Library. London : D. Nutt. pp. 50.
8. Robert Mond and O.H. Meyers. Temples of Armant, a Preliminary Survey: The Text, The Egypt Exploration Society, London, 1940, 160.
9. ニッポニカ (2014). (『日本大百科全書（ニッポニカ）』小学館、2014年。)
10. Doxey, Denise M. (1998). Egyptian Non-Royal Epithets in the Middle Kingdom: A Social and Historical Analysis. Brill. p. 119. ISBN 90-04-11077-1.
11. "pharaoh" in Encyclopædia Britannica. Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008.
12. T. Schneider: Lexikon der Pharaonen. Düsseldorf 2002, S. 23.
13. J-M. Kruchten, Les annales des pretres de Karnak (OLA 32), 1989, pp. 474–478.
14. Alan Gardiner, "The Dakhleh Stela", Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 19, No. 1/2 (May, 1933) pp. 193–200.
15. Sewell-Lasater, Tara (2020). "Becoming Kleopatra: Ptolemaic Royal Marriage, Incest, and the Path to Female Rule". University of Houston: 456 note 23.
16. van Oppen de Ruiter, Branko Fredde (2007). The Religious Identification of Ptolemaic Queens with Aphrodite, Demeter, Hathor and Isis. Vol. One. The City University of New York. p. 463.
17. "AET_9.1.O". Attalus. Archived from the original on 14 March 2026. Retrieved 25 March 2026.
18. Herodotus, Histories 2.111.1. See Anne Burton (1972). Diodorus Siculus, Book 1: A Commentary. Brill., commenting on ch. 59.1.
19. Elazar Ari Lipinski: "Pesach – A holiday of questions. About the Haggadah-Commentary Zevach Pesach of Rabbi Isaak Abarbanel (1437–1508). Archived 2017-03-16 at the Wayback Machine Explaining the meaning of the name Pharaoh." Published first in German in the official quarterly of the Organization of the Jewish Communities of Bavaria: Jüdisches Leben in Bayern. Mitteilungsblatt des Landesverbandes der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinden in Bayern. Pessach-Ausgabe Nr. 109, 2009, ZDB-ID 2077457-6, S. 3–4.
20. Walter C. Till: "Koptische Grammatik". VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig, 1961. p. 62.
21. R. Hannig: Ägyptisches Wörterbuch 2: Mittleres Reich und zweite Zwischenzeit. Mainz 1995, S. 1850.
22. Alexandra von Lieven: Grundriss des Laufes der Sterne – Das sogenannte Nutbuch. The Carsten Niebuhr Institute of Ancient Eastern Studies (u. a.), Kopenhagen 2007, ISBN 978-87-635-0406-5, S. 163–164.
23. Paul Johnson: Cywilizacja starożytnego Egiptu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo '69, 1997, s. 43-44.
24. Herodot: Historien. II 61, II 170 f.
25. Dessoudeix 2008, 4e de couverture.
26. 川村 (1969), pp. 50–53. (川村 喜一, 杉 勇ほか「1-三:エジプトにおける灌漑文明の成立」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、45-54頁。)
27. 屋形 (1998), pp. 530–531. (屋形 禎亮, 大貫 良夫ほか『世界の歴史I 人類の起原と古代オリエント』中央公論社、1998年。)
28. Clayton 1995, p. 9-10.
29. 屋形 (1969), pp. 74–76. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
30. Wilkinson 1999, p. 47-52.
31. 松本 (1994), p. 152. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプト文字手帳』株式会社 弥呂久、1994年。ISBN 4946482075。)
32. 松本 (1998), p. 21-22. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
33. Menu 2004, p. 23.
34. 屋形 (1969), pp. 57–60. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
35. Menu 2004, p. 23-24.
36. Wilkinson 1999, p. 67-68.
37. Toby A. H. Wilkinson, Early Dynastic Egypt, Routledge 1999, pp. 57f.
38. S. Bickel: Die Verknüpfung von Weltbild und Staatsbild. Tübingen 2009, S. 82–84 und 87–88.
39. 屋形 (1969), pp. 61–70. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
40. ASSMANN, Jan. Egypt: theologie a zbožnost rané civilizace. Překlad Barbora Krumphanzlová, Ladislav Bareš. Praha: Oikuméné, 2002. 328 s. ISBN 80-7298-052-1. S. 81.
41. Clayton 1995, p. 31-59.
42. 屋形 (1969), pp. 71–74. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
43. 屋形 (1969), pp. 64. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
44. Leclant 2005, p. 1844-1846 : Pyramide par Rainer Stadelmann.
45. История Древнего Востока, 2009, с. 71—75. (И. А. Ладынин, М. Д. Бухарин, Б. С. Ляпустин, А. А. Немировский. История Древнего Востока. — Москва: Дрофа, 2009. — 623,[1] с. — («Высшее образование»). — ISBN 978-3-358-01189-2.)
46. FilipF. Taterka FilipF., «Każdy król Górnego i Dolnego Egiptu jest ojcem i matką wszystkich ludzi». Długowieczna władza faraona, „Pomocnik Historyczny” (3/2018), 2018, ISSN 2391-7717 .
47. Clayton 1995, p. 60-67.
48. Carrier 2009-2010, Préambule.
49. Leclant 2005, p. 2155-2156 : Textes des pyramides.
50. 屋形 (1969), p. 66. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
51. 松本 (1998), pp. 84–85. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
52. 松本 (1998), pp. 93–94. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
53. 松本 (1998), p. 97. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
54. Clayton 1995, p. 70-72.
55. Clayton 1995, p. 69-74.
56. 屋形 (1969), pp. 77–82. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
57. TRIGGER, Bruce Graham, et al. Starověký Egypt: dějiny společnosti. Překlad Renata Landgráfová, Jana Mynářová. Praha: Volvox Globator, 2005. 451 s. ISBN 80-7207-535-7. S. 73.
58. 松本 (1998), p. 119. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
59. Clayton 1995, p. 74-88.
60. Vernus 2001.
61. 松本 (1998), p. 137. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
62. Vernus et Yoyotte 1988, p. 64, 146.
63. Desroches Noblecourt 1986, p. 93.
64. 松本 (1998), p. 138, 143-150. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
65. Clayton 1995, p. 90-95.
66. 屋形 (1969), pp. 199–201. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
67. История Древнего Востока, 2009, с. 112—114. (И. А. Ладынин, М. Д. Бухарин, Б. С. Ляпустин, А. А. Немировский. История Древнего Востока. — Москва: Дрофа, 2009. — 623,[1] с. — («Высшее образование»). — ISBN 978-3-358-01189-2.)
68. Barbotin 2008, p. 75-82 et textes documentaires.
69. Grandet 2008.
70. История Древнего Востока, 2009, с. 121—126. (И. А. Ладынин, М. Д. Бухарин, Б. С. Ляпустин, А. А. Немировский. История Древнего Востока. — Москва: Дрофа, 2009. — 623,[1] с. — («Высшее образование»). — ISBN 978-3-358-01189-2.)
71. 屋形 (1969), pp. 208–211. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
72. 屋形 (1998), pp. 472–474. (屋形 禎亮, 大貫 良夫ほか『世界の歴史I 人類の起原と古代オリエント』中央公論社、1998年。)
73. 中山 (1969), pp. 227–228. (中山 伸一, 杉 勇ほか「7-二:土地所有(公的土地所有)」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、242-260頁。)
74. Weeks 2001.
75. Weeks 2001, p. 112-123.
76. Weeks 2001, p. 54-58.
77. 屋形 (1969), pp. 211–214. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
78. 松本 (2020), pp. 30–31. (松本 弥『古代エジプトの神々』株式会社 弥呂久、2020年。ISBN 9784946482366。)
79. Cabrol 2000, p. 280-282.
80. 屋形 (1969), pp. 215–219. (屋形 禎亮, 杉 勇ほか「2:「神王国家」の出現と「庶民国家」及び6:イク＝エン＝アテンとその時代」『岩波講座 世界歴史1』岩波書店、1969年、55-82, 197-226頁。)
81. Laboury 2010.
82. 松本 (1998), pp. 221–227. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
83. 松本 (1998), pp. 230–236. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
84. 松本 (1998), pp. 237–246, 248. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
85. 屋形 (1998), p. 508. (屋形 禎亮, 大貫 良夫ほか『世界の歴史I 人類の起原と古代オリエント』中央公論社、1998年。)
86. Della Monica 2001, p. 107-110.
87. Masquelier-Loorius 2013.
88. 松本 (1998), pp. 250–254. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
89. Grandet 1993.
90. 松本 (1998), pp. 255–256. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
91. 松本 (1998), pp. 256–263. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
92. 屋形 (1998), pp. 514–521. (屋形 禎亮, 大貫 良夫ほか『世界の歴史I 人類の起原と古代オリエント』中央公論社、1998年。)
93. Vergano, Dan. “Egyptologist: Ramses III assassinated in coup attempt” (英語). USA TODAY. 2022年3月19日閲覧。
94. 屋形 (1998), pp. 523–525. (屋形 禎亮, 大貫 良夫ほか『世界の歴史I 人類の起原と古代オリエント』中央公論社、1998年。)
95. 松本 (1998), p. 269. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
96. Clayton 1995, p. 175.
97. 松本 (1998), p. 270-271. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
98. 松本 (1998), p. 274-277. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
99. Christiane Ziegler, Les trésors de Tanis, Paris, Picard, 2001.
100. 松本 (1998), p. 281-282. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
101. Janot 2008, p. 67-71.
102. Janot 2008, p. 75-79.
103. Jean Yoyotte, Les principautés du Delta au temps de l'anarchie libyenne, Le Caire, IFAO, 2012.
104. 松本 (1998), p. 292-293. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
105. Clayton 1995, p. 185-186.
106. 松本 (1998), p. 278. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
107. Vernus et Yoyotte 1988, p. 188-189.
108. 松本 (1998), pp. 308–309. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
109. 松本 (1998), pp. 306–312. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
110. 松本 (1998), pp. 314–316. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
111. Clayton 1995, p. 195.
112. 松本 (1998), pp. 318–326. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
113. Vernus et Yoyotte 1988, p. 149-150.
114. Vernus et Yoyotte 1988, passim.
115. История Древнего Востока, 2009, с. 170—171. (И. А. Ладынин, М. Д. Бухарин, Б. С. Ляпустин, А. А. Немировский. История Древнего Востока. — Москва: Дрофа, 2009. — 623,[1] с. — («Высшее образование»). — ISBN 978-3-358-01189-2.)
116. Collins, Andrew (2014). "The Divinity of the Pharaoh in Greek Sources". The Classical Quarterly. 64 (2): 841–844, also see n. 1. doi:10.1017/S000983881400007X. ISSN 0009-8388. Archived from the original on 2024-03-15. Retrieved 2024-03-15.
117. 松本 (1998), pp. 329–330. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
118. 松本 (1998), pp. 332–335. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
119. Clayton 1995, p. 194-205.
120. Clayton 1995, p. 206-216.
121. Vernus et Yoyotte 1988, p. 136-138.
122. Clayton 1995, p. 217.
123. Anna Świderek: Historie nieznane Historii. Warszawa, PWN, 1962, s. 233-234.
124. Corteggiani 2007, p. 404-406 et 366-368.
125. Jadwiga Lipińska: W cieniu piramid. Wrocław: Ossolineum, 2003, s. 195.
126. von Beckerath، Jürgen (1999). Handbuch der ägyptischen Königsnamen. Verlag Philipp von Zabern. ص. 266–267. ISBN:978-3422008328.
127. T. Schneider: Lexikon der Pharaonen. Düsseldorf 2002.
128. Manouvrier 1996, p. 564-567.
129. RAY, John. Ve stínu pyramid: skutečný život ve starém Egyptě. Překlad Dušan Zbavitel. Praha: Albatros, 2003. 181 s. ISBN 80-00-01228-6. S. 6.
130. MÁLEK, Jaromír. Stará říše. In: SHAW, Ian. Dějiny starověkého Egypta. Praha: BB/art, 2003. ISBN 80-7257-975-4. Kapitola 5, s. 115.
131. Manouvrier 1996, p. 464 et 556.
132. Pascal Vernus, Dictionnaire amoureux de l'Égypte pharaonique, Paris, 2010, Plon.
133. 松本 (1998), pp. 160. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
134. 松本 (2020), pp. 19–20. (松本 弥『古代エジプトの神々』株式会社 弥呂久、2020年。ISBN 9784946482366。)
135. 松本 (1998), pp. 174. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
136. Salima Ikram, Antico Egitto, p. 192.
137. 松本 (2020), p. 92-96. (松本 弥『古代エジプトの神々』株式会社 弥呂久、2020年。ISBN 9784946482366。)
138. Немировский, Банщикова, 2009, с. 20—24. (А. А. Немировский, А. А. Банщикова. «Неограниченные» ближневосточные монархии Позднебронзового века: некоторые сравнительные характеристики // В сб.: Правитель и его подданные: социокультурная норма и ограничения единоличной власти. 2-е издание. — Москва: Институт Африки РАН, 2009. — С. 18—43. — ISBN 978-5-91298-038-1.)
139. Немировский, Банщикова, 2009, с. 24—26. (А. А. Немировский, А. А. Банщикова. «Неограниченные» ближневосточные монархии Позднебронзового века: некоторые сравнительные характеристики // В сб.: Правитель и его подданные: социокультурная норма и ограничения единоличной власти. 2-е издание. — Москва: Институт Африки РАН, 2009. — С. 18—43. — ISBN 978-5-91298-038-1.)
140. Mark, Joshua (2 September 2009). "Pharaoh – World History Encyclopedia". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
141. Fermat et Lapidus 1999.
142. Menu 2004, chapitres 1, 3, 6..
143. Menu 2004, p. 86-87.
144. Mark (2009). (Joshua J. Mark. “Pharaoh” (英語). World History Encyclopedia. 2022年3月3日閲覧。)
145. HORNUNG, Erik. Faraon. In: DONADONI, Sergio. Egyptský člověk a jeho svět. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2006. ISBN 80-7021-813-4. Kapitola 10, s. 251.
146. Menu 2004, p. 95-97.
147. Fermat et Lapidus 1999, p. 6.
148. Fermat et Lapidus 1999, p. 83-84.
149. Немировский, Банщикова, 2009, с. 32—33. (А. А. Немировский, А. А. Банщикова. «Неограниченные» ближневосточные монархии Позднебронзового века: некоторые сравнительные характеристики // В сб.: Правитель и его подданные: социокультурная норма и ограничения единоличной власти. 2-е издание. — Москва: Институт Африки РАН, 2009. — С. 18—43. — ISBN 978-5-91298-038-1.)
150. Menu 2004, p. 18 et 85.
151. Немировский, Банщикова, 2009, с. 19. (А. А. Немировский, А. А. Банщикова. «Неограниченные» ближневосточные монархии Позднебронзового века: некоторые сравнительные характеристики // В сб.: Правитель и его подданные: социокультурная норма и ограничения единоличной власти. 2-е издание. — Москва: Институт Африки РАН, 2009. — С. 18—43. — ISBN 978-5-91298-038-1.)
152. Philippe-Ernest Legrand, Hérodote : L'Égypte, Histoires II, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1997.
153. TRIGGER, Bruce Graham, et al. Starověký Egypt: dějiny společnosti. Překlad Renata Landgráfová, Jana Mynářová. Praha: Volvox Globator, 2005. 451 s. ISBN 80-7207-535-7. S. 183.
154. Ладынин, 2005, с. 75. (И. А. Ладынин. Сакрализация царской власти в древнем Египте в конце IV – начале II тыс. до н.э. // Сакрализация власти в истории цивилизаций. — Москва: Институт Африки РАН, 2005. — С. 55—81. — 447 с. — ISBN 5-201-04781-5.)
155. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 304-305.
156. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 300-301.
157. Frankfort 1951, p. 122-136.
158. Christian Leblanc, « Piliers et colosses de type « osiriaque » dans le contexte des temples de culte royal », BIFAO 80, Le Caire,‎ 1980, p. 69-89 (lire en ligne).
159. Goyon 1972, p. 8.
160. Goyon 1972, p. 41-46.
161. Wilson 1993, p. 17-56.
162. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 307-318.
163. Ian Shaw, The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt, Oxford University Press 2000, p. 477
164. Wilkinson, Toby A. H. Early Dynastic Egypt. Routledge, 2001 ISBN 978-0-415-26011-4
165. Rolf Felde: Ägyptische Gottheiten. 2., erweiterte und verbesserte Auflage, R. Felde Eigenverlag, Wiesbaden 1995, S. 21.
166. SHAW, Ian. Úvod: chronologické členění a proměny hmotné kultury v Egyptě. In: SHAW, Ian. Dějiny starověkého Egypta. Praha: BB/art, 2003. ISBN 80-7257-975-4. Kapitola 1, s. 25.
167. Dodson, Aidan and Hilton, Dyan. The Complete Royal Families of Ancient Egypt. Thames & Hudson. 2004. ISBN 0-500-05128-3
168. Jürgen von Beckerath: Handbuch der ägyptischen Königsnamen. Mainz 1999, S. 26.
169. Lucia Gahlin: Ägypten - Götter, Mythen, Religionen. Edition XXL, Reichelsheim 2001, ISBN 389736-312-7, S. 196.
170. FORMAN, Werner; QUIRKE, Stephen. Posmrtný život na Nilu,. Překlad Ladislav Bareš. London: Opus Publishing, 1996. 192 s. S. 41.
171. VERNER, Miroslav; BAREŠ, Ladislav; VACHALA, Břetislav. Ilustrovaná encyklopedie starého Egypta. Praha: Karolinum, 1997. 487 s. ISBN 80-7184-446-2. S. 242.
172. Wilkinson, Toby A. H. Early Dynastic Egypt. Routledge, 2001, p. 158.
173. Wilkinson 1999, p. 186.
174. Manfred Lurker, Lexikon der Götter und Symbole der alten Ägypter, Scherz 1998, S.121f.
175. Hagen, Rose-Marie; Hagen, Rainer (2007). Egypt Art. New Holland Publishers Pty, Ltd. ISBN 978-3-8228-5458-7.
176. "The royal crowns of Egypt". Egypt Exploration Society. 7 March 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-05-18. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
177. Gaskell, G. (2016). A Dictionary of the Sacred Language of All Scriptures and Myths. Routledge Revivals. ISBN 978-1-317-58942-6.
178. Shaw, Garry J. The Pharaoh, Life at Court and on Campaign. Thames and Hudson, 2012, pp. 21, 77.
179. Bob Brier, The Murder of Tutankhamen, 1998, p. 95.
180. Wilkinson, Toby A. H. Early Dynastic Egypt. Routledge, 2001, p. 160.
181. Wilkinson, Toby A. H. Early Dynastic Egypt. Routledge, 2001, p. 161.
182. Wilkinson, Toby A. H. Early Dynastic Egypt. Routledge, 2001, p. 159.
183. Wilkinson, Toby A. H. Early Dynastic Egypt. Routledge, 2001, p. 162.
184. ”The Queen Who Would Be King” (på engelska). Smithsonian. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-queen-who-would-be-king-130328511/. Läst 27 juli 2017.
185. "Pharaoh". AncientEgypt.co.uk. The British Museum. 1999. Archived from the original on 27 November 1999. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
186. Cauville 2011, p. 3-17.
187. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 42.
188. スペンサー (2009), pp. 24–25. (A.J.スペンサー 著、近藤 二郎, 小林 朋則 訳『大英博物館 図説古代エジプト史』原書房、2009年。ISBN 978-4-562-04289-0。)
189. Collectif 2014, Renaud Pietri, « Le roi en char au Nouvel Empire », p. 13-22.
190. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 181-182.
191. Menu 1998, p. 233-245.
192. Posener 1960, p. 60-61.
193. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 164-166.
194. Desroches Noblecourt 1986, p. 65-66.
195. de Heusch 1987, p. 222-223.
196. Adler 2000, p. 26-27.
197. Baud 1999, p. 370.
198. Hopkins 1994.
199. Aufrère 2005, p. 271.
200. 屋形 (1998), pp. 464–465. (屋形 禎亮, 大貫 良夫ほか『世界の歴史I 人類の起原と古代オリエント』中央公論社、1998年。)
201. Obsomer 2012, p. 250-260.
202. Desroches Noblecourt 1986, p. 34-36.
203. Leclant 2005, p. 1130.
204. Baud 1999, passim.
205. 松本 (1998), p. 56, 62, 68. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
206. Forgeau 1986, p. 183-184.
207. Servajean 2014, p. 139-140.
208. Baud 1999, p. 333, 185, 192.
209. Desroches Noblecourt 1986, p. 47, 54-55.
210. Obsomer 2012, p. 231-244.
211. Leclant 2005, p. 1878-1879.
212. スペンサー (2009), pp. 18–19. (A.J.スペンサー 著、近藤 二郎, 小林 朋則 訳『大英博物館 図説古代エジプト史』原書房、2009年。ISBN 978-4-562-04289-0。)
213. Jean Leclant (directeur), Dictionnaire de l'Antiquité, Paris, PUF, 2005 (réimpr. 2011), 2390 p.(ISBN 9782130589853), p. 1878-1879.
214. Tyldesley 1997.
215. Joël Guilleux, « XVIIIe dynastie », sur antikforever.com (consulté le 19 décembre 2020), § 5 sur Smenkhkarê.
216. Joël Guilleux, « Mérytaton », sur antikforever.com (consulté le 19 décembre 2020).
217. Servajean 2014, passim.
218. Desroches Noblecourt 1986, p. 92.
219. Leclant 2005, p. 1530.
220. 松本 (1998), pp. 180. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
221. (en) Ian Shaw, « Seeking the Ramesside Royal Harem : New Fieldwork at Medinet el-Gurob », Ramesside Studies in Honour of Ken Kitchen,‎ 2011 (lire en ligne).
222. Maruéjol 2007, p. 116.
223. Inschrift vom Ptachschepses, James Henry Breasted Ancient Records of Egypt Part I, §§ 256 to 262
224. Maruéjol 2007, p. 106-108.
225. Cabrol 2000, p. 129-136.
226. Desroches Noblecourt 1996, p. 337-344.
227. スペンサー (2009), pp. 157–160. (A.J.スペンサー 著、近藤 二郎, 小林 朋則 訳『大英博物館 図説古代エジプト史』原書房、2009年。ISBN 978-4-562-04289-0。)
228. Sergio Donadoni, L'uomo egiziano, p. 299.
229. Grönblom 2002, s. 54
230. Christian Jacq, Le Voyage dans l'autre monde selon l'Égypte ancienne : épreuves et métamorphoses du mort d'après les textes des pyramides et les textes des sarcophages (thèse de IIIe cycle en Études égyptologiques, soutenue à Paris en 1979), Éditions du Rocher, coll. « Civilisation et tradition », Monaco, 1986, 492 p. (ISBN 2-268-00456-2).
231. Najovits, Simson R. (2003). Egypt, trunk of the tree. 1: The contexts. Algora Publ. pp. 151–157. ISBN 9780875862347.
232. Weeks 2001, p. 54-109.
233. Grönblom 2002, s. 111–113
234. Gros de Beler 2000, p. 26-43.
235. (en) The Griffith Institute, « Tutankhamun: Anatomy of an Excavation. The Howard Carter Archives. Photographs by Harry Burton. List of Objects. », sur griffith.ox.ac.uk, 2000-2004 (consulté le 5 avril 2015).
236. Gros de Beler 2000, p. 71-73.
237. Leclant 2005, p. 2123 : Tanis par Dominique Valbelle.
238. Clayton 1995, p. 178-181.
239. 松本 (1998), p. 288. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
240. „Шарқий экспресс. Қатнов тикланган Сувайш канали, Иорданияда ҳибслар, Қоҳира бўйлаб сайр қилган Рамзес II“. Bugun.uz. 2021-yil 17-avgustda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 2021-yil 4-aprel. (Wayback Machine saytida 2021-08-17 sanasida arxivlangan)
241. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 43-49.
242. Clayton 1995, p. 11-12.
243. 松本 (1998), p. 11. (松本 弥『図説 古代エジプトのファラオ』株式会社 弥呂久、1998年。ISBN 4946482121。)
244. Clayton 1995, p. 10-11.
245. Clayton 1995, p. 11.
246. Bonhême et Forgeau 1988, p. 44.
247. Auguste Mariette, « La table de Saqqarah », La Revue Archéologique, Paris, vol. 10,‎ 1864, p. 168-186, planche 17 (lire en ligne).
248. Clayton 1995, p. 10-12.
249. A. H. Gardiner: Egyptian Grammar. Oxford 1957, S. 75–76.
250. “聖書本文検索 - 日本聖書協会ホームページ” (2021年3月15日). 2022年9月2日閲覧。
251. Lefebvre 1949, p. 1-25.
252. Lefebvre 1949, p. 70-90.
253. Lefebvre 1949, p. 91-105.
254. Lefebvre 1949, p. 137-158.
255. 「パロ」『キリスト教大事典』改訂新版、教文館、1968年、852頁。
256. 1Mpanj. 11.40: "Ary Solomona nitady hamono an'i Jeroboama. Fa Jeroboama niainga, dia nandositra nankany Egypta ho any amin'i Sisaka, mpanjakan'i Egypta, ka nitoetra tany mandra-pahafatin'i Solomona." (Ny Baiboly)
257. 2Tant. 12.2-9: "2 Ary tamin' ny taona fahadimy nanjakan-dRehoboama mpanjaka dia niakatra Sisaka, mpanjakan' i Egypta, hamely an' i Jerosalema, fa nivadika tamin' i Jehovah ny mponina tany, (..) 5 Ary Semaia mpaminany tonga tao amin-dRehoboama sy ireo mpanapaka ny Joda, izay tafangona tany Jerosalema noho ny amin' i Sisaka, ka nanao taminy hoe: Izao no lazain' i Jehovah: Hianareo efa nahafoy Ahy, koa Izaho kosa dia mba nahafoy anareo ho eo an-tànan' i Sisaka. (...) 7 Ary nony hitan' i Jehovah fa niaiky izy, dia tonga tao amin' i Semaia indray ny tenin' i Jehovah nanao hoe: Efa niaiky izy, ka dia tsy handringana azy Aho, fa tsy ho ela dia hamonjy azy; ary tsy haidiko amin' i Jerosalema avy amin' ny tànan' i Sisaka ny fahatezerako. (...) 9 Dia niakatra Sisaka, mpanjakan' i Egypta, hamely an' i Jerosalema ka namabo ny rakitry ny tranon' i Jehovah sy ny rakitry ny tranon' ny mpanjaka: samy nobaboiny avokoa izy rehetra; ary nobaboiny koa ny ampinga volamena izay nataon' i Solomona." (Ny Baiboly)
258. Clayton 1995, p. 192.
259. 2Mpanj. 17. 4: "4 Ary ny mpanjakan' i Asyria nahita fa niodina Hosea; fa efa naniraka olona tany amin' i So, mpanjakan' i Egypta, izy sady tsy nanatitra hetra ho an' ny mpanjakan' i Asyria intsony tahaka ny fanaony isan-taona; koa dia nanidy azy ny mpanjakan' i Asyria sy namatotra azy tao an-trano-maizina." (Ny Baiboly)
260. 2Mpanj. 19.9: "Ary nony ren'i Sankeriba ny amin'i Tiraka, mpanjakan'i Etiopia, nanao hoe: Indro, avy hiady aminao izy, dia naniraka olona indray ho any amin'i Hezekia izy (...)" (Ny Baiboly)
261. Is. 37.9: "Ary ren'i Sankeriba ny amin'i Tiraka, mpanjakan'i Etiopia, nanao hoe: Avy hiady aminao izy; ary nony nandre izany izy, dia naniraka olona ho any amin'i Hezekia (...)" (Ny Baiboly)
262. Clayton 1995, p. 196.
263. Segond 1968.
264. 2Mpanj. 23.29: "Tamin'ny andro nanjakan'i Josia no niakaran'i Farao-neko, mpanjakan'i Egypta, hankany amoron'ny ony Eofrata hiady amin'ny mpanjakan'i Asyria; ary Josia mpanjaka dia nandeha hiady amin'i Farao. Kanjo nony hitany, dia matiny tao Megido izy." (Ny Baiboly)
265. ספר ירמיהו, פרק מ"ד, פסוק ל'
266. Robert Graves, Les mythes grecs, Paris, GLM, 1958 (réimpr. 2001), p. 400.
267. Aline Tallet-Bonvalot, Le roman d'Alexandre, Paris, GF-Flammarion, 1994, p. 37-49.
268. Laurance Harf-Launcner, Le roman d'Alexandre, Paris, Le Livre de poche, 1994, p. 82-83.
269. Patmore, Hector M. (2008). Adam, Satan, and the King of Tyre: The Reception of Ezekiel 28:11-19 in Judaism and Christianity in Late Antiquity (PDF) (PhD thesis). Durham University. p. 170. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-12-21. Retrieved 2024-12-18.
270. Ulmer, Rivka (2009). Egyptian Cultural Icons in Midrash. Studia Judaica. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. pp. 74–76. ISBN 978-3-11-022392-7.
271. Litwa, M. David (2016). Desiring Divinity: Self-deification in Early Jewish and Christian Mythmaking. Oxford University Press. p. 33.
272. Ulmer, Rivka (2016). "Egyptian Motifs in Late Antique Mosaics and Rabbinic Texts". In Kalimi, Isaac (ed.). Bridging Between Sister Religions: Studies of Jewish and Christian Scriptures Offered in Honor of Prof. John T. Townsend. The Brill Reference Library of Judaism. Leiden: Brill. p. 208. ISBN 978-90-04-32454-1.
273. القرآن الكريم.
274. “Quran Search”. corpus.quran.com. 2021年4月16日閲覧。
275. Wensinck; Vajda (1965). “Fir‘awn”. In Lewis, B.; Pellat, Ch. [英語版]; Schacht, J. [英語版] (eds.). The Encyclopaedia of Islam, New Edition, Volume II: C–G. Leiden: E. J. Brill. pp. 917–918.
276. Ислам. Энциклопедиялық анықтамалық. Алматы: “Аруна Ltd.” ЖШС, 2010 ISBN 9965-26-322-1
277. Krauss 2000.
278. Römer 2008, p. 105-111.
279. « L'Égyptien - The Egyptian, Michael Curtiz (1954) ».
280. (en) « Christian Jacq », sur worldcat.org, 2015 (consulté le 3 mai 2015).
281. « La Terre des pharaons (Land of the Pharaohs) ».
282. « Le Pharaon (Jerzy Kawalerowicz, Pologne - 1965) ».
283. 三代川, 寛子「20世紀初頭におけるコプト・キリスト教徒のファラオ主義とコプト語復興運動 イクラウディユース・ラビーブの『アイン・シャムス』の分析を中心に」『オリエント』第58巻第2号、2016年3月31日、184-195頁、doi:10.5356/jorient.58.2_184。
284. “Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, ‘pharaoh’ president ousted during Arab Spring, dies at 91” (英語). Fortune. 2022年3月27日閲覧。
285. “The day it all started for Ad-Diba and the Pharaohs” (英語). www.fifa.com. 2022年3月27日閲覧。