Roman Kingdom

Origins and Archaeology

Human presence in central Italy dates back long before the conventional foundation of the city. Archaeological excavations indicate that scattered pastoral settlements existed in Latium during the Bronze Age, with evidence of human occupation in the area of Rome dating to the fourteenth through tenth centuries BC, especially near the Palatine and the future Forum Boarium.^[1][2][3] During the Final Bronze Age and Early Iron Age (tenth to ninth centuries BC), Latin culture settlements emerged on the Palatine, Quirinal, Esquiline, and Caelian hills.^[4][5][6] The location provided natural defensive ramparts on the volcanic tuff hills and a crossing point over the Tiber via the Tiber Island, approximately 25 kilometres upstream from the river's mouth on the Tyrrhenian Sea.^[7][8][9] This ford permitted control over the commercial land routes connecting Etruria to the north with Campania to the south, as well as the salt-trading route later known as the Via Salaria, which transported salt harvested from coastal Tiber estuaries inland to the Sabine mountains.^[3][10][11]

Burial practices from the tenth and ninth centuries BC demonstrate ethnic and cultural distinctions among the hills. Inhabitants of the Palatine Hill incinerated their dead and placed the ashes in biconical or hut-shaped terracotta urns, conforming to wider Latin customs, whereas graves found on the Quirinal and Viminal hills featured inhumations in hollowed wooden logs, characteristic of Sabine traditions. In 1948, excavations on the Germal slope of the Palatine uncovered post-holes of three eighth-century BC rectangular wattle-and-daub huts, providing physical evidence for early Iron Age domestic architecture.^[12] In the northeastern Palatine, remains of an earthen fortification wall dated to around 730 BC were excavated by Andrea Carandini, who termed it the Murus Romuli, although scholars dispute whether this structure can be attributed to an individual founder.^[13][14][15]

Archaeological phases show an evolution from isolated hamlets toward an integrated urban centre. Phase III of Latial culture (c. 770–730 BC) exhibits increased social differentiation, visible through richer grave goods containing weapons and terracotta model chariots indicating aristocratic status.^[12] Phase IVa (c. 730–630 BC), the Orientalising period, reveals imported Corinthian Greek pottery, Phoenician luxury goods, and bucchero ceramics, illustrating expanding trade networks across the Mediterranean.^[16] In the late seventh century BC, around 625 to 600 BC, the marshy valley between the hills was drained, the public space of the Roman Forum was paved, and stone foundations with timber frames and terracotta tiled roofs began replacing wattle-and-daub huts.^[17][18][19] Excavations at the Regia, the Comitium, and the sanctuary of Sant'Omobono near the Forum Boarium reveal major phases of public and religious building between 590 and 570 BC and again around 540 to 530 BC.^[20][21]

Mythological Traditions

Roman literary tradition linked the origins of the city to the Trojan War. According to Virgil's Aeneid and Livy's Ab Urbe Condita, the Trojan prince Aeneas, son of Anchises and the goddess Venus, fled the sack of Troy with his son Ascanius (also named Iulus) and landed on the coast of Latium.^[22][23] He was welcomed by King Latinus, married Latinus's daughter Lavinia, and founded the settlement of Lavinium after defeating Turnus, king of the Rutuli.^[22] Ascanius governed Lavinium for thirty years before founding Alba Longa under the Alban Hills, where his descendants, the Silvii, ruled for several centuries.^[22]

Generations later, King Proca of Alba Longa left the throne to his son Numitor, who was deposed by his brother Amulius. To prevent rivals to the crown, Amulius murdered Numitor's male heirs and forced his niece Rhea Silvia to become a Vestal Virgin, binding her to perpetual chastity.^[24][25] However, Rhea Silvia became pregnant by Mars, giving birth in March 771 BC to twin boys, Romulus and Remus.^[26][27] Amulius ordered the infants drowned in the Tiber, but the river had overflowed its banks, and the basket carrying the babies grounded near the Ficus Ruminalis at the foot of the Palatine Hill, near the Lupercal cave.^[28][29][30] A she-wolf (lupa) suckled them, and a woodpecker (picus), a bird sacred to Mars, watched over them, until the shepherd Faustulus found them and brought them to his wife Acca Larentia.^{[28][31][32][33]} Classical commentators rationalised the legend by noting that lupa was Latin slang for a prostitute, identifying Acca Larentia herself as the nurse.^[10][34]

Upon reaching adulthood, the twins discovered their lineage, assassinated Amulius, and restored Numitor to the Alban throne.^[35] Declining to remain in Alba Longa, they set out to establish a settlement where they had been exposed, bringing along outcasts, runaways, and shepherds.^[36][37][38] A dispute arose regarding the site and leadership: Romulus chose the Palatine, intending to name the settlement Rome, while Remus preferred the Aventine, proposing the name Remora.^[39] They agreed to seek divine sanction through augury. Remus first saw six vultures from the Aventine, but Romulus subsequently observed twelve vultures from the Palatine, provoking an argument over whether priority in time or quantity of birds constituted the sign.^[39] In the confrontation, Romulus killed Remus; an alternative account records that Remus leaped over the freshly cut furrow of the pomerium in derision and was struck down by Romulus or his companion Celer.^[40][41][42]

Historiography and Chronology

No contemporary administrative archives or narrative texts survive from the regal era. The earliest Roman historiography began during the Second Punic War with Quintus Fabius Pictor (writing c. 200 BC in Greek), who relied on aristocratic family oral traditions, funeral eulogies, and banquet songs mentioned by Cato the Elder.^{[43][44][45][46]} Later comprehensive narratives were composed during the Late Republic and early Principate by Livy, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Plutarch, Cicero, and Marcus Terentius Varro.^[43][47] Many early state records and pontifical archives were lost when the Senones Gauls under Brennus sacked Rome following the Battle of the Allia in 390 BC according to Varro, or 387/386 BC according to Polybius.^{[46][48][49][50]}

The canonical chronology codified by Varro assigned 243 years to the regal period, calculated as seven generations of approximately thirty-five years each, establishing the foundation of Rome on 21 April 753 BC (the third year of the sixth Olympiad) and the fall of the kings in 509 BC.^{[48][49][51][52][53]} Other ancient historians calculated divergent foundation dates, such as Timaeus of Tauromenium (814 BC), Quintus Fabius Pictor (747 BC), and Lucius Cincius Alimentus (728 BC).^[54][55] Since the nineteenth-century critical analyses of Barthold Georg Niebuhr, Theodor Mommsen, and Ettore Pais, modern scholars have viewed the strict twenty-four-decade, seven-king chronology as an artificial construct.^[48][56] Historians argue that seven monarchs over two and a half centuries represent an uncharacteristically long average reign of thirty-five years, and evidence suggests that unrecorded leaders or military commanders (condottieri) also held power in early Rome.^[57][58]

In the mid-twentieth century, Georges Dumézil analysed the traditional narrative using comparative Indo-European mythology, proposing that the sequence of the first four kings mirrored the tripartite functional model: Romulus and Numa Pompilius embodied the sovereign and religious function, Tullus Hostilius represented the warrior function, and Ancus Marcius exemplified the producer and builder function, paralleled by the archaic triad of gods (Jupiter, Mars, Quirinus).^[59][60] While Dumézil considered the earliest accounts to be transposed myths, subsequent excavations revealing eighth-century and seventh-century BC structures have led many historians to treat the literary tradition as preserving a memory of real structural developments, even if the individual narratives are embellished with moralising and republican retrospection.^[15][61][62]

Political and Constitutional Institutions

At the head of the early Roman state was the king (rex), an elected magistrate holding lifelong supreme executive, military, judicial, and religious power.^[63][64][65] The etymology of rex derives from the Proto-Indo-European root *reg-, signifying one who guides or determines what is straight, an ancient title shared with Celtic and Indo-Iranian languages.^[66] The king's authority was characterised by imperium, conferring absolute command over the army and the civil administration without modern constitutional checks.^[65][67] The regal insignia, adapted under Etruscan influence, consisted of twelve lictors carrying fasces with axes, the ivory curule chair (sella curulis), the purple toga (toga picta or toga praetexta), red shoes, and a white diadem.^[68]

The King's Powers and Roles

As chief executive, the king held exclusive authority to manage state property, allocate conquered territory (ager publicus), distribute war booty, and commission public infrastructure.^[65][67] In foreign affairs, he received foreign ambassadors and initiated diplomatic negotiations, though custom dictated that formal declarations of war required ratification by the assemblies.^[65][69] In administrative governance, the king appointed subordinate officers to exercise delegated authority. Upon entering office, he selected the tribunus celerum, who served as commander of the royal bodyguard (the celeres) and tribune of the Ramnes tribe; this officer held the right to convene the assemblies and resigned upon the monarch's death.^[70] When the king departed the city, he designated a city warden (praefectus urbi) who assumed civic imperium within the walls.^[70]

In his capacity as supreme priest, the king acted as the sole official mediator between the Roman people and the gods.^[65][67] Only the king possessed the public auspicium, the right to ascertain the divine will through augury before undertaking state business.^[71] He regulated the civic calendar, fixing the dates of monthly festivals, and announced which days were legally permitted for public affairs (dies fasti) or prohibited (dies nefasti).^[72][73] As supreme magistrate of justice, he had jurisdiction over capital crimes and civil suits, assisted by an advisory council.^[67][74][75] For specific offenses, he appointed investigative officers, including the quaestores parricidii for cases of parricide and the duumviri perduellionis for high treason.^[70][74][76]

Royal Succession and Interregnum

The Roman monarchy was elective rather than strictly hereditary.^[63][77][78] Upon a king's death, the auspices and sovereign authority reverted to the Senate, initiating an interregnum.^[78][79] The Senate divided into groups of ten (decuriae), and an individual senator, designated as interrex, held imperium for five days; if no king was appointed, the office passed successively to another senator every five days.^[80][81] Once an appropriate candidate was identified, the interrex presented the nominee to the Senate for approval (patrum auctoritas).^[82]

Following senatorial approval, the interrex convened the Curiate Assembly, which voted to accept or reject the candidate.^[82] If confirmed, the king-elect was escorted to the citadel on the Capitoline Hill, where an augur sought signs from the gods through auspices (inauguratio).^[82] Finally, the king himself proposed the Lex curiata de imperio to the assembly, which formally conferred imperium upon him, ratifying his command over the citizens and legions.^[71][82]

The Senate and Assemblies

According to tradition, Romulus established the Senate (Senatus, from senex, 'old man') as a council of elders consisting of 100 clan patriarchs (patres).^{[83][84][85][86]} Following the integration of the Sabines, Romulus added 100 members, and Tarquinius Priscus appointed an additional 100 from conquered Etruscan gentes, bringing the assembly to 300 members.^{[85][87][88][89]} The Senate served primarily as an advisory council (consilium) to the king; it met only when summoned by the monarch, lacked independent initiative to enact laws, but possessed the constitutional authority to review legislation passed by popular assemblies and maintain the state during an interregnum.^{[74][89][90][91]}

The primary popular gathering was the Curiate Assembly (Comitia Curiata), composed of the thirty curiae (ten from each of the archaic tribes: Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres).^{[87][92][93][94]} Meeting in the Comitium at the Forum, the assembly voted by curia rather than by individual citizen; it ratified the election of kings, passed the Lex curiata de imperio, approved declarations of war, and witnessed adoptions (adrogatio) and family wills.^[67][69] A purely religious convocation, the Comitia Calata, met on the Capitoline twice a year under the presidency of the Pontifex Maximus to inaugurate the rex sacrorum and flamines and witness the formal renunciation of family sacra (detestatio sacrorum).^{[95][96][97][98]}

Society and Social Classes

The fundamental unit of archaic Roman society was the familia, governed by the pater familias, who exercised absolute authority (patria potestas) over his wife, children, slaves, and property.^{[80][99][100][101]} This power legally permitted the pater familias to inflict corporal punishment, sell family members into bondage, or pass capital judgment.^{[80][100][101]} Families tracing common ancestry composed a clan (gens), whose members shared a gentilic name (nomen gentilicium).^[102][103] The gentes collectively owned land, maintained shared burial areas, and held hereditary domestic religious rites (sacra gentilicia).^[104]

Society was structured into three main social strata: patricians, plebeians, and clients. The patricians (from patres) constituted the hereditary nobility, who owned the largest herds, controlled vast tracts of agricultural land, and retained exclusive access to magistracies, priesthoods, and senatorial seats.^{[85][101][105]} The plebeians (from plebs, 'multitude') encompassed farmers, artisans, and traders; during the monarchy, they bore civic burdens including taxes and military service but lacked political magistracies, and marriage between patricians and plebeians was forbidden.^[106] Clients were dependents who attached themselves to a wealthy patrician patron (patronus) in exchange for economic sustenance, land to farm, and judicial protection in court.^{[80][101][107]} In return, clients rendered personal deference, political support, and military service under the patron's clan contingent; this bond was rooted in sacred mutual trust (fides).^{[80][107][108]}

Slaves occupied the lowest social tier and were initially limited in number, acquired mainly as captives of war or through debt bondage (nexum).^[106][109] Enslaved persons were treated as domestic chattel, lacking civil rights or legal family recognition, though Roman domestic slavery in this early period remained patriarchal and closely integrated with household labour.^[106] Free Roman women (matronae) could own personal property and participate in religious festivals, banquets, and public life, although their legal status remained subordinate to the domestic authority of a pater familias.^[99][110]

Reigns of the Kings

Roman historiography recounts a succession of seven monarchs who contributed to the formation of the city's civil, religious, and military structures.^{[48][111][112][113]} The first four kings were alternately Latin and Sabine, generally portrayed as pious leaders respecting aristocratic tradition, whereas the final three kings were of Etruscan origin, distinguished by centralising public administration and urban monuments.^[112][114]

Romulus

Reigning from 753 to 716 BC, Romulus fortified the Palatine Hill and established Rome's foundational political bodies, selecting the first 100 senators and establishing the three original tribes (Ramnes, Tities, Luceres) and thirty curiae.^{[83][115][116][117][118]} To increase the population, he offered sanctuary to runaway slaves, debtors, and exiles, settling five of Rome's hills.^{[115][119][120][121]} To obtain wives for his male citizens, Romulus organised the festival of the Consualia, inviting neighbouring Sabine communities before orchestrating the abduction of the young women.^{[122][123][124]} Sources report varying estimates of the abducted women, ranging from 30 to 683.^[122] The resulting war against the Sabines ended when the women intervened on the battlefield, leading to a political union under a diarchy with King Titus Tatius until Tatius's death five years later.^{[122][125][126][127]}

Romulus conducted victorious campaigns against the neighbouring communities of Caenina, Antemnae, Crustumerium, Fidenae, and Veii, expanding Roman territory across central Latium.^{[119][128][129]} After a reign traditionally calculated as thirty-seven or thirty-eight years, Romulus disappeared during a violent thunderstorm while inspecting his army at the Goat's Marsh (Palus Caprae) on the Campus Martius.^{[119][130][131][132]} Amidst rumours that he was murdered and dismembered by senators, the patrician Proculus Julius testified that Romulus appeared to him in a divine vision, instructing that the founder be worshipped as the god Quirinus.^{[119][133][134][135]}

Numa Pompilius

Following a one-year interregnum, the Sabine Numa Pompilius from Cures was elected second king, reigning from 715 to 673 BC.^{[136][137][138][139]} Known for piety and wisdom, his forty-three-year reign was peaceful, during which the doors of the newly built Temple of Janus remained continuously closed to signify the absence of armed conflict.^{[140][141][142][143][144]} According to legend, Numa received spiritual instruction from the nymph Egeria in a sacred grove.^{[145][146][147]} He reformed the calendar, converting the archaic ten-month cycle into a solar-lunar year of twelve months by adding January and February.^{[73][140][148][149]}

Numa codified Roman religious rituals, establishing the office of the Pontifex Maximus and the College of Pontiffs, the three major flamines (Dialis, Martialis, Quirinalis), the Vestal Virgins, the Salii priests, and the Fetiales.^{[73][140][150][151][152]} He instituted the worship of Terminus, the god of boundary stones, and organised the tradesmen of Rome into professional guilds (collegia).^{[73][150][153]} When an ancile (sacred bronze shield) allegedly fell from heaven during a plague as a divine pledge of Rome's imperium, Numa ordered blacksmiths to forge eleven exact replicas to safeguard the original.^{[152][154][155]}

Tullus Hostilius

Elected third king, Tullus Hostilius reigned from 673 to 642 BC and pursued aggressive expansion, contrasting with Numa's pacifism.^{[156][157][158][159][160]} War broke out against Alba Longa, which tradition relates was resolved through combat between two sets of triplets: the Roman Horatii and the Alban Curiatii.^{[161][162][163]} Following subsequent Alban treachery during campaigns against Fidenae and Veii, Tullus razed Alba Longa, enslaved or deported its population to Rome, and settled them on the Caelian Hill, incorporating its leading noble families (including the Julii) into the patrician order.^{[156][161][164][165]}

To accommodate the enlarged Senate, Tullus erected the Curia Hostilia in the Forum, which remained the primary senatorial meeting house for over five centuries.^{[156][159][165][166]} He established the Salii Collini (or Agonenses) dedicated to Quirinus.^{[73][167][168]} Modern archaeology notes that excavations at Castel Gandolfo suggest Alba Longa was abandoned gradually around 650 BC rather than destroyed in a single assault.^[169] Livy writes that after neglecting the gods during extensive wars, Tullus contracted a disease, attempted to perform secret sacrifices to Jupiter Elicius, and misperformed the rites, whereupon he was struck dead by a lightning bolt that incinerated his palace.^{[170][171][172][173]}

Ancus Marcius

Numa's grandson Ancus Marcius was elected fourth king, reigning from 640 to 616 BC.^{[174][175][176][177]} Combining religious restoration with territorial defense, he transcribed the ritual laws of Numa onto public wooden tablets.^[178][179] In a war with the Latins, he captured the towns of Politorium, Tellenae, Ficana, and Medullia and resettled their inhabitants on the Aventine Hill, thus forming the plebeian class.^{[175][180][181][182]}

Ancus expanded Rome's infrastructure by fortifying the Janiculum Hill on the right bank of the Tiber, connecting it to the city via the Pons Sublicius, Rome's earliest wooden pile bridge.^{[175][180][181][183]} He constructed Rome's first public prison (the Tullianum or Mamertine Prison) on the Capitoline slope.^{[174][175][180][183]} Extending Roman influence to the Tyrrhenian coast, he established salt works at the mouth of the Tiber and founded the port colony of Ostia Antica, although definitive archaeological remains at Ostia only date to the fourth century BC.^{[169][175][181][183]} Ancus died of natural causes after a twenty-four-year reign.^[177][184]

Lucius Tarquinius Priscus

Lucius Tarquinius Priscus (reigned 616–578 BC) was the fifth king and the first of Etruscan origin.^{[185][186][187]} Born Lucumo in Tarquinia, he was the son of Demaratus of Corinth and an Etruscan noblewoman; encouraged by his wife Tanaquil, who was skilled in reading omens, he immigrated to Rome.^{[186][188][189][190]} He gained the favour of Ancus Marcius, who appointed him guardian of his sons.^{[185][186][189]} Upon Ancus's death, Tarquinius succeeded him on the throne.^{[186][189][191]} He conducted successful wars against the Sabines and Latins, obtaining extensive spoils.^{[185][186][187][192]}

Tarquinius enlarged the Senate by adding 100 members from the minores gentes (minor clans) and doubled the military forces to 6,000 infantry and 600 cavalry.^{[88][192][193][194]} He initiated monumental construction projects, including the drainage of the valleys through the Cloaca Maxima, the foundation of the Roman Forum, and the excavation of the Circus Maximus for chariot races, introducing the Ludi Romani.^{[195][196][197][198]} He celebrated the first Roman triumph in a gilded four-horse chariot wearing an embroidered purple tunic, and introduced Etruscan symbols of office: fasces, curule chairs, and the toga praetexta.^{[198][199][200][201]} He commenced construction on the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus on the Capitoline before being assassinated by assassins hired by the sons of Ancus Marcius after a thirty-eight-year reign.^{[195][200][202][203]}

Servius Tullius

Servius Tullius (reigned 578–535 BC) succeeded his father-in-law without a formal interregnum, secured by Tanaquil's political concealment of Tarquinius's death until Servius had established control.^{[204][205][206]} Ancient traditions regarding his origins diverge: Roman sources state he was born in the palace to Ocrisia, a captive noblewoman from Corniculum, while legends relate that a phallus emerged from the royal hearth, fathering Servius through divine intervention from Vulcan, signified by flames surrounding the sleeping child's head without harming him.^{[207][208][209]} The Emperor Claudius later identified Servius Tullius with the Etruscan warrior Mastarna, a companion of Aulus and Caelius Vibenna depicted on the fourth-century BC François Tomb at Vulci fighting Cnaeus Tarquinius of Rome (Cneve Tarchunies Rumach).^[210][211]

Servius carried out comprehensive constitutional, social, and military reforms. He instituted the first census, reorganising citizens into five economic classes based on landed property and monetary wealth, which met in the Centuriate Assembly (Comitia Centuriata).^{[212][213][214][215]} He changed the traditional kinship-based division of the tribes, creating four urban tribes (Suburbana, Palatina, Esquilina, Collina) and, according to differing accounts, sixteen, seventeen, or twenty-six rural tribes.^{[214][216][217]} He fortified Rome with an earthen agger, moat, and stone ramparts surrounding the Seven Hills, later misattributed as the Republican Servian Wall.^[204][218] Additionally, he built the Temple of Diana on the Aventine Hill as a shared federal sanctuary for the Latin League.^[219][220] Servius was assassinated after a forty-four-year reign in a palace coup orchestrated by his daughter Tullia and her husband, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus.^{[212][221][222][223]}

Lucius Tarquinius Superbus

Lucius Tarquinius Superbus (reigned 534–509 BC), the seventh and final king, seized the throne by force without popular election or senatorial confirmation.^{[224][225][226][227]} Later Roman republican tradition portrays his reign as one of autocratic rule, judicial terror, and the persecution of senators who opposed him.^{[225][228][229][230]} Tarquinius waged wars against neighbouring peoples, capturing Suessa Pometia from the Volsci and subjugating Gabii and the Rutuli.^{[228][231][232]} Using war spoils and forced plebeian labour, he completed the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus on the Capitoline Hill, employing the Etruscan sculptor Vulca of Veii to craft the cult statue and roof terracotta quadriga.^{[225][228][233][234][235]}

According to Roman tradition, Tarquinius's tyrannical rule provoked widespread opposition, which erupted when his son Sextus Tarquinius raped Lucretia, the wife of Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus.^{[225][236][237][238][239]} Lucretia revealed the crime to her father Spurius Lucretius Tricipitinus, her husband Collatinus, Publius Valerius Poplicola, and Lucius Junius Brutus, before committing suicide to preserve her honour.^{[225][236][238][239][240]} Brutus roused the citizens, closed the gates of Rome against the king, and led the Senate to banish Tarquinius and his family in 509 BC.^{[236][241][242][243][244]} The monarchy was abolished, and Brutus and Collatinus were elected as Rome's first consuls (initially termed praetors), establishing the Roman Republic.^{[236][243][244][245][246]}

Religion, Priesthoods, and Festivals

Religious organization under the monarchy formed the cornerstone of early Roman public life. The state cults (sacra publica) were supervised by the College of Pontiffs (Collegium Pontificum) under the Pontifex Maximus, an office traditionally created by Numa Pompilius.^{[73][247][248][249]} The pontiffs held ultimate judicial and ritual oversight over all public and private religious obligations, preserving the sacred ritual ordinances codified in the libri pontificales.^{[250][251][252][253]} The three flamines maiores, chosen from the patricians, served Jupiter (Flamen Dialis), Mars (Flamen Martialis), and Quirinus (Flamen Quirinalis), while fifteen flamines minores, established later and chosen from the plebeians, served lesser deities such as Carmenta, Ceres, Flora, Pomona, and Vulcan; all were subject to the authority of the Pontifex Maximus.^[254]

The Vestal Virgins, tasked with maintaining the sacred eternal flame of Vesta in the Forum, were instituted under Numa with four priestesses (two from the Ramnes and two from the Tities), later expanded to six by Tarquinius Priscus or Servius Tullius with two priestesses from the Luceres.^{[145][152][247][255]} The Vestals guarded the sacred relics of Rome (fatale pignus imperii) and prepared mola salsa, a ritual mixture of spelt flour and salt sprinkled upon animal sacrifice victims.^{[145][256][257]} Other major priestly bodies included the Salii (armed dancing priests of Mars and Quirinus who carried the sacred bronze ancilia), the Fetiales (priests dedicated to Jupiter who conducted formal diplomacy and ritually proclaimed war and peace), the Fratres Arvales (who oversaw agricultural fertility rites), and the Augures, who interpreted divine omens before public events.^{[73][258][259][260][261]}

The archaic Roman pantheon was structured around triads and agrarian protector deities. The earliest supreme divine body was the Archaic Triad of Indo-European heritage, consisting of Jupiter, Mars, and Quirinus, which was later replaced under Etruscan influence by the Capitoline Triad of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, Juno, and Minerva.^[59][262] Household protection fell to the Lares (ancestral and spatial guardian spirits), Penates (protectors of the storeroom brought from Troy), and the Genius and Juno (spiritual protectors of individual men and women).^[263] Numerous agricultural gods were worshipped: Consus (protector of stored grain), Saturn (agriculture and vines), Ops (harvest and abundance), Terminus (boundary markers), Mater Matuta (dawn and fertility), and Faunus (flocks and pastures).^{[264][265][266][267][268]} Janus, the two-faced god of beginnings and thresholds, gave his name to the month of January and had his shrine (Ianus Geminus) opened in wartime and closed in peace.^{[269][270][271]}

The annual religious calendar contained approximately forty official festivals. Among the oldest pastoral rituals was the Feriae Latinae, celebrated on the Alban Mount by the Latin League with libations of milk and the communal consumption of a sacrificed sheep.^[272][273] Other major archaic festivals included the Lupercalia (15 February), involving purification by the Luperci priests running in goatskins; the Parilia (21 April), celebrating the goddess Pales and the birthday of Rome; the Lemuria (May), when householders exorcised wandering ghosts (lemures); the Robigalia (25 April), featuring a dog sacrifice to ward off cereal rust; the Fordicidia (15 April), involving the sacrifice of pregnant cows to Tellus; the Saturnalia (17 December); and the Compitalia, celebrating neighbourhood Lares at crossroads.^{[274][275][276][277][278][279][280]}

Military Organisation

The military forces of the early kingdom were organised directly on tribal lines. Each of the three archaic Romulean tribes (Ramnes, Tities, Luceres) was divided into ten curiae, with each curia obligated to supply 100 infantry soldiers (pedites), forming a century (centuria), and ten horsemen (equites), forming a decuria.^{[87][117][281][282]} The archaic Roman army thus consisted of a single legion comprising 3,000 foot soldiers commanded by military tribunes (tribuni militum) and 300 cavalry troops led by the tribunus celerum.^{[117][282][283]} Weapons were personal property, and aristocratic clan leaders fought with swords, thrusting spears, bronze conical helmets, and small round shields (clipeus) alongside their retinues.^[284][285]

Under Servius Tullius in the sixth century BC, military recruitment shifted from tribal kinship to wealth-based classes, influenced by Greek hoplite tactics introduced via Etruria.^{[215][286][287]} Servius divided the citizenry into five military classes (classis) determined by landed property and assessable wealth in copper ases, producing 193 centuries in the Comitia Centuriata: The first class (citizens possessing at least 100,000 ases and 20 iugera of land) provided 80 centuries of hoplite heavy infantry (40 of younger men, juniores, for field campaigns, and 40 of older men, seniores, for city defence), equipped with bronze helmet, cuirass, greaves, round bronze shield, spear, and sword.^{[213][215][288]} Above them were 18 centuries of cavalry (equites equo publico). The second class (wealth of 75,000 ases, 15 iugera) provided 20 centuries plus two centuries of military engineers, equipped similarly to hoplites but carrying the elongated scutum and omitting the bronze breastplate.^[215][288] The third class (wealth of 50,000 ases, 10 iugera) provided 20 centuries, lacking greaves and breastplates.^[215][288] The fourth class (wealth of 25,000 ases, 5 iugera) provided 20 centuries of light infantry armed with spears and javelins.^[215][288] The fifth class (wealth of 11,000 ases, 2 iugera) provided 30 centuries of slingers and missile troops.^[215][288] Citizens below this property threshold (proletarii or capite censi) were exempt from combat duty, forming a single unarmed century of military reserves.^[288]

Economy and Material Culture

The economy of early Rome rested upon subsistence cereal cultivation and pastoral stockbreeding. Families cultivated small private plots (heredia) while pasturing herds of sheep, goats, swine, and cattle on common pasture land (ager publicus).^{[17][289][290][291]} Primitive grains such as spelt (far) and barley predominated, supplemented by legumes, cabbage, radishes, olives, and viticulture, as evidenced by grape seeds found in Forum burial sites.^{[17][289][291]} Cattle served as the principal draught animal and represented the primary measure of movable wealth, reflected in the Latin word for money (pecunia), which derives directly from livestock (pecus).^[290][291]

Resource extraction and artisanal industries grew during the seventh and sixth centuries BC. Extensive salt pans at the Tiber's mouth were harvested to supply urban and rural herds, distributed inland along the Via Salaria.^[10][11] Metallurgy expanded through raw iron imported from mines on the island of Elba (Ilva) and bronze-casting techniques transmitted through Etruscan craftspeople.^[292] Ceramic manufacturing progressed from hand-made domestic ware to wheel-turned impasto and black-glazed bucchero pottery produced in dedicated urban workshops.^[17] Periodic commerce occurred on an eight-day market cycle (nundinae), when farmers and artisans entered Rome to trade commodities. Prior to regular bronze coinage in the fourth century BC, exchange relied upon barter and weighed copper ingots (aes rude) using the archaic bronze as as a basic accounting standard.^[293][294]

Law and Justice

Law in the regal period was governed by royal statutes (leges regiae) and ancestral custom (mos maiorum).^[295][296] Surviving fragments collected by Sextus Pomponius and later jurists indicate that early laws addressed social cohesion, military service, and religious transgressions.^[297] The earliest known Latin inscription, found on the Lapis Niger stele under the Comitium and dated to around 570–550 BC, contains an archaic boustrophedon inscription mentioning the word recei (to the king) and declaring sacred penalties for profaning the shrine.^[18][298]

Regal legal sanctions intertwined religious expiation with civil punishment. Minor infractions were expiated through animal sacrifices to the aggrieved deity (piacula), while severe crimes transformed the transgressor into an accursed outcast (homo sacer), whom anyone could execute without penalty.^[76][299] High treason (perduellio) was punished by hanging the offender from an unfruitful tree (arbor infelix) and beating them to death, whereas intentional murder and parricide (parricidium) incurred the penalty of being sewn into a leather sack and submerged in the Tiber.^[76] King Servius Tullius also established a registration levy known as the death tax, requiring a coin to be deposited at the temple of Libitina on the Esquiline Hill upon every death to maintain demographic records.^{[300][301][302][303]}

Fall of the Monarchy and Aftermath

The collapse of the kingdom in 509 BC ended Etruscan dynastic control and led to the creation of the Republic.^{[236][304][305][306]} Following Tarquinius Superbus's expulsion, royalist aristocrats attempted a counter-revolution known as the Tarquinian Conspiracy; the plot was exposed, and the participants, including two of the consul Lucius Junius Brutus's sons, were condemned to death and executed.^[307][308] Seeking to recover his throne, Tarquinius enlisted the aid of Lars Porsena, the Etruscan ruler of Clusium.^{[241][246][309]} Roman historical tradition asserts that Porsena abandoned the siege of Rome, impressed by the heroism of Horatius Cocles at the Pons Sublicius, Mucius Scaevola thrusting his hand into fire, and Cloelia escaping captivity across the Tiber.^[246]

Alternative traditions recorded by Tacitus and Pliny the Elder suggest that Porsena conquered Rome, disarmed its populace, and held the city until his son Arruns was defeated at the Battle of Aricia by an allied coalition of Latins and Greeks from Cumae.^[309][310] Modern historians note that the fall of the Roman monarchy coincided with a wider retreat of Etruscan power in Latium and Campania, as independent city-states replaced monarchies with aristocratic councils.^[311] Some scholars argue that rather than an immediate upheaval, the transition from monarchy to the dual consulate took several decades to consolidate, concluding around 475–460 BC.

To prevent the re-emergence of tyranny, the Republic divided the king's powers among elected magistrates. Executive and military command was vested in two annually elected colleagues, initially termed praetores and later consules, each possessing veto power over the other.^{[243][312][313]} In severe military emergencies, an individual dictator was appointed for a maximum term of six months, holding temporary absolute authority. The king's sacral duties were preserved under the rex sacrorum, a patrician priest subordinated to the Pontifex Maximus who was barred from political office, ensuring that religious mediation with the gods persisted without monarchical power.^{[78][314][315]} Throughout the Republic, the concept of monarchy (regnum) remained an object of political hatred, and political figures accused of seeking royal power, including Spurius Maelius, Marcus Manlius Capitolinus, and Tiberius Gracchus, were put to death.^[316][317]

References

1. Coarelli 2008, p. 127; 135-136. (Coarelli, Filippo (2008). «I santuari, il fiume, gli empori». Turim. Storia Einaudi dei Greci e dei Romani. 13)
2. Peroni 2008, p. 11. (Peroni, Renato (2008). «Comunità e insediamento in Italia fra età del bronzo e prima età del ferro». In: Momigliano, A.; Schiavone, A. Storia di Roma, I: Roma in Italia. Turim: Einaudi)
3. Boatwright 2004, Vznik městské společnosti, s. 47 – 51 (Boatwright, Mary T. et al. (2004), Dějiny římské říše od nejranějších časů po Konstantina Velikého (2012, 1. české vyd.), Praha: Grada, ISBN 978-80-247-3168-1)
4. Momigliano, p. 64—67
5. Paul Erdkamp. A Companion to the Roman army. Malden, MA; Oxford; Carlton, Vic : Blackwell Publishing. 8. lpp. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8.
6. Palatine Hill: History
7. Havell 2003, p. 544. (Havell, H. L. (2003). Ancient Rome. The Republic. Glásgua: Geddes & Grosset. ISBN 1-84205-186-5)
8. Stobart 1978, p. 10. (Stobart, J.C. (1978). The Grandeur that was Rome. Londres: Hesperides Press)
9. Roldán, J. M. (1995): p. 45.
10. Salles 2008a, p. 112. (Salles, Catherine (2008a). Larousse das Civilização Antigas. Vol. I Dos faraós à fundação de Roma. São Paulo: Larousse do Brasil. ISBN 978-85-7635-443-7)
11. Durando 2006, p. 106-107. (Durando, Furio (2006). Itália Antiga. Barcelona: Folio. ISBN 84-413-2265-1)
12. Momigliano, p. 66—68
13. Carandini 2007, p. 22-24. (Carandini, Andrea (2007). Roma il primo giorno. Roma: Editori Laterza)
14. Carandini, Andrea (2007). Rome: Day One (2011 edición). Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691139227. Consultado el 31 de enero de 2016.
15. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 17-19.
16. Grimal 1981, p. 24.
17. Cornell 2008, p. 19-20.
18. Momigliano, p. 75—76
19. Gary Forsythe. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London : University of California Press, 2005. 86. lpp. ISBN 0-520-22651-8.
20. Hus 1980, p. 250.
21. Sant'Omobono-kirken ved foten av Kapitol, turismoroma.it
22. Plutarco século Ia, p. I.2. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
23. Carrasco, Juan Bautista (1865). Mitología universal: historia y esplicación (sic) de las ideas religiosas y teológicas de todos los siglos, de los dioses de la India, el Thibet (sic), la China, el Asia, el Egipto, la Grecia y el mundo romano, de las divinidades de los pueblos esclavos, escandinavos y germanos, de la idolatría y el fetichismo americanos y africanos, etc. Imprenta y Librería de Gaspar y Roi.
24. Plutarco século Ia, p. 3.2. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
25. Miles 1995, s. 138–139, on Livy, notes how he distinguishes between literal truth and a Roman "right to claim descent from Mars... because it appropriate symbolises the martial accomplishments of [later] Romans, who... have the ability to compel others to accede to that claim". Miles 1995, s. 142. (Miles, Gary B (1995). Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-3060-7. OCLC 31658236.)
26. Plutarco 1936, p. 135, nota b. (Plutarco (1936). «Sobre a Fortuna dos Romanos». Morália. Cambrígia: Harvard University Press)
27. Plutarco século Ia, p. 3.4. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
28. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.4.
29. Varrão século I a.C. (a), p. V.54.
30. Plutarco século Ia, p. 4.1. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
31. Plutarco século Ia, p. 4.2-3. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
32. Plutarco século Ia, p. 3.5-6. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
33. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.5-7.
34. Gaffiot 1934, p. 1373. (Gaffiot, Félix (1934). Dictionnaire abrégé latin‑français. Paris: Hachette)
35. Plutarco século Ia, p. 7-8. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
36. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.6.
37. Plutarco século Ia, p. 9.1-2. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
38. Lomas 2018, s. 45. (Lomas, Kathryn (2018). The Rise of Rome: from the Iron Age to the Punic Wars (1st Harvard udgave). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-65965-0. OCLC 1015274849.)
39. Plutarco século Ia, p. 9.5; 10.1-3. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
40. Plutarco século Ia, p. 9.4; 11.1. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
41. Salles 2008a, p. 111. (Salles, Catherine (2008a). Larousse das Civilização Antigas. Vol. I Dos faraós à fundação de Roma. São Paulo: Larousse do Brasil. ISBN 978-85-7635-443-7)
42. ZAMAROVSKÝ. Dejiny písané Rímom. [s.l.]: [s.n.] S. 24.
43. Piel et Minéo 2011, p. 5-6.
44. Piel et Minéo 2011, p. 7.
45. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 12.
46. Plutarch: Numa I.1. [w:] Plutarch’s Lives. with an English Translation by. Bernadotte Perrin [on-line]. perseus.tufts.edu. [dostęp 2013-06-07]. (ang.).
47. T. J. Cornell. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). London; New York : Routledge, 1995. 2.-3. lpp. ISBN 978-0-415-01595-0.
48. Asimov, Isaac (1991). Asimov's Chronology of the World. New York: HarperCollins. p. 69. ISBN 0-06-270036-7.
49. Asimov 1991. (Asimov, Isaac (1991). Asimov's Chronology of the World. Barcelona: Ariel S. A. ISBN 84-344-8016-6)
50. Asimov, Isaac: Cronología del mundo. Barcelona: Ariel, 1992. ISBN 84-344-8016-6.
51. M. Jaczynowska: Historia starożytnego Rzymu. s. 25–26.
52. Tytus Liwiusz: Dzieje Rzymu od założenia miasta. Księgi I – VI. Edycja komputerowa: www.zrodlahistoryczne.prv.pl, 2003.
53. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Roman Antiquities. penelope.uchicago.edu. [dostęp 2013-06-06]. (ang.).
54. Heurgon 1993, p. 224.
55. Rome from its origins to 264 bc Encyclopædia Britannica. Viitattu 24.2.2017. (englanniksi)
56. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 12-14.
57. Vicentino 2011, p. 139. (Vicentino, Cláudio (2011). História Geral e do Brasil. São Paulo: Scipione. ISBN 978-852627816-5)
58. Heurgon 1993, p. 227.
59. Piel et Minéo 2011, p. 14-15.
60. Le Glay 1990, p. 47.
61. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 14-16.
62. WALBANK. The Cambridge Ancient History. [s.l.]: [s.n.] S. 82–83.
63. Momigliano 1989, p. 97.
64. Abbott 1901, p. 8. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
65. Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Elibron Classics (ISBN 0-543-92749-0).
66. J. P. Mallory (trad. Jean-Luc Giribone), À la recherche des Indo-européens, Seuil, 1997 (ISBN 2-02-014390-9), p. 141.
67. Abbott 1901, p. 15. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
68. Heurgon 1993, p. 208.
69. Abbott 1901, p. 19. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
70. Abbott 1901, p. 16. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
71. Heurgon 1993, p. 202-203.
72. Heurgon 1993, p. 204-205.
73. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 2.2.
74. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1.49
75. Livius, Ab urbe condita, 1.49
76. Heurgon 1993, p. 209-210.
77. Abbott 1901, p. 6. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
78. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 29.
79. Abbott 1901, p. 10. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
80. Cornell 2008, p. 18-19.
81. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.17.
82. Abbott 1901, p. 14. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
83. "Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 1, chapter 8". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 2015-12-09.
84. Abbott 1901, p. 12. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
85. Plutarco século Ia, p. 13. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
86. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.6.
87. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:8, 13
88. Lívio 27-25 a.C., p. I.35.
89. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 28.
90. Abbott 1901, p. 17. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
91. WALBANK. The Cambridge Ancient History. [s.l.]: [s.n.] S. 100–103.
92. Abbott 1901, p. 18. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
93. Byrd 1995, p. 33. (Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate of the Roman Republic: Addresses on the History of Roman Constitutionalism. Washington: Government Printing Office)
94. T. Liwiusz: I.13.
95. Botsford 1909, p. 155-165.
96. Lintott 1999, p. 49. (Lintott, Andrew (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxônia: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-926108-3)
97. Botsford 1909, p. 104; 154.
98. Turcan 2000, p. 44. (Turcan, Robert (2000). The Gods of Ancient Rome. Nova Iorque: Routledge)
99. Funari 2001, p. 84-85-94. (Funari, Pedro Paulo (2001). Grécia e Roma. São Paulo: Editora Contexto)
100. 더들리, p.23.
101. Heikki Jokinen, Ossi Kokkonen, Ilkka Kuivalainen, Suvi Randén, Timo Tikkala: ”2. Varhainen Rooma”, Opas antiikin Roomaan. e-Oppi, 2016.
102. Rostovtzeff 1960, p. 30. (Rostovtzeff, Michael (1960). História de Roma. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores)
103. 초기 로마인들은 저마다 두 가지 이름이 있었다. 하나는 개인 이름(praenomen)이고, 다른 하나는 씨족의 이름 이었다. 후대에 씨족이 규모가 커지고 가족들이 분화하면서 셋째 이름, 즉 가문명(cognomen)도 덧붙이게 되었다. 예를 들어 가이우스 율리우스 카이사르(Caius Iulius Cæsar)의 경우, 가이우스가 개인 이름, 율리우스는 씨족 이름, 카이사르는 율리우스 씨족에 속한 그의 가문 이름이었다.《로마사》, 프리츠 하이켈하임 저, p.81.
104. Fowler 1922, p. 86. (Fowler, William Warde (1922). The Religious Experience of the Roman People. Londres: Macmillan and Co., limited)
105. Cotrim 1999, p. 64. (Cotrim, Gilberto (1999). História Global. Brasil e Geral. São Paulo: Saraiva. ISBN 85-02-02450-7)
106. Panazzo 2002, p. 138. (Panazzo, Sivia (2002). Navegando pela história. São Paulo: Quinteto Editorial. ISBN 85-305-0485-2)
107. Apolinário 2009, p. 191. (Apolinário, Maria Raquel (2009). História Projeto Araribá. São Paulo: Moderna. ISBN 978-85-16-05498-4)
108. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 31.
109. Vicentino 2011, p. 140. (Vicentino, Cláudio (2011). História Geral e do Brasil. São Paulo: Scipione. ISBN 978-852627816-5)
110. G. Alföldy: Historia społeczna starożytnego Rzymu. s. 23.
111. Salles 2008a, p. 114-115. (Salles, Catherine (2008a). Larousse das Civilização Antigas. Vol. I Dos faraós à fundação de Roma. São Paulo: Larousse do Brasil. ISBN 978-85-7635-443-7)
112. Heurgon 1993, p. 201.
113. Eutropio, Breviarium ab Urbe condita, I, 8.
114. Vgl. Susanne Hähnchen: Rechtsgeschichte. Von der Römischen Antike bis zur Neuzeit. 4., völlig neu bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. C. F. Müller, Heidelberg u. a. 2012, ISBN 978-3-8114-9842-6, S. 13.
115. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:8
116. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.1.7.
117. Plutarco século Ia, p. 20. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
118. Tito Livio, Ab Urbe condita libri, I, 7.
119. Plutarco século Ia, p. 10. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
120. Tito Livio, Ab Urbe condita libri I, 1.7.
121. Plutarco, Vita di Romolo, 14, 2-6; Livio, Ab Urbe condita libri, I, 9.
122. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:9–13
123. Plutarco século Ia, p. 14-15. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
124. T. Liwiusz: I.9.
125. Plutarco século Ia, p. 19-20. (Plutarco (século Ia). Vida de Rômulo. [S.l.: s.n.])
126. Tito Livio, Ab Urbe condita libri, I, 12-13; Plutarco, Vita di Romolo, 17-19.
127. Forsythe 2005, s. 97, adding that "Titus Tatius" may be a name for an early Roman monarch who was removed from the narrative of seven kings.
128. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:14–15
129. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.10.
130. Plutarch Life of Romulus 29.7
131. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.11.
132. Plutarch, Life of Romulus, 28
133. Livy Ab Urbe Book I ch. 16
134. Plutarch Life of Romulus Book I ch. 28
135. Plutarco, Vita di Romolo, 27-29; Livio, Ab Urbe condita libri, I, 15.
136. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:17–18
137. Plutarco século Ib, p. 5. (Plutarco (século Ib). Vida de Numa Pompílio. [S.l.: s.n.])
138. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 2.1.
139. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: II.59.
140. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:19
141. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:20
142. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.1.21.
143. Plutarco século Ib, p. 20. (Plutarco (século Ib). Vida de Numa Pompílio. [S.l.: s.n.])
144. Eutropio, Breviarium ab Urbe condita, I, 3.
145. Ramsay 1875, p. 1189-1191. (Ramsay, William (1875). «Vestales». In: Smith, William. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Londres: John Murray)
146. Numa Pompilius og nymfen Egeria
147. Egerias nymfeum, Valle della Caffarella, via Appia Antica, Roma
148. Plutarco século Ib, p. 18-19. (Plutarco (século Ib). Vida de Numa Pompílio. [S.l.: s.n.])
149. T. Liwiusz: I.18-20.
150. Plutarco século Ib, p. 17. (Plutarco (século Ib). Vida de Numa Pompílio. [S.l.: s.n.])
151. Plutarco século Ib, p. 9-11. (Plutarco (século Ib). Vida de Numa Pompílio. [S.l.: s.n.])
152. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 2.3.
153. Dionísio de Halicarnasso século I a.C., p. II.74.2-5. (Dionísio de Halicarnasso (século I a.C.). Das antiguidades romanas. [S.l.: s.n.])
154. Plutarco século Ib, p. 13. (Plutarco (século Ib). Vida de Numa Pompílio. [S.l.: s.n.])
155. Mynter med ancilla
156. Matyszak 2003, pp. 26–28.
157. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.1.22.
158. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 3.1.
159. Eutropio, Breviarium ab Urbe condita, I, 4.
160. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: III.1.
161. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.1.29.
162. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.14-16.
163. T. Liwiusz: I.29.
164. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 3.9.
165. T. Liwiusz: I.30.
166. Niebuhr 1983, p. 296-298; 346-352.
167. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.27.
168. T. Liwiusz: I.27.
169. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 35-37.
170. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:31
171. Cícero 54-51 a.C., p. II.17.
172. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.17.
173. T. Liwiusz: I.31.
174. Matyszak 2003, p. 30.
175. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.33.
176. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 4.1.
177. Eutropio, Breviarium ab Urbe condita, I, 5.
178. Schmitz 1875, p. 939-942. (Schmitz, Leonhard (1875). «Pontifex». In: Smith, William. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Londres: John Murray)
179. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.33.
180. T. Liwiusz: I.32-33.
181. Matyszak 2003, p. 31.
182. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.32.
183. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 4.2.
184. Abbott 1901, p. 9. (Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston: Elibron Classics. ISBN 0-543-92749-0)
185. Everitt 2012, p. 30
186. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.34.
187. Eutropio, Breviarium ab Urbe condita, I, 6.
188. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 5.1.
189. T. Liwiusz: I.34-35.
190. Livius: Romas historie § 1.34.6, ToposText
191. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: III.46.
192. Roldán, J. M. (1995): pág. 58.
193. Roldán 1995, p. 58. (Roldán, J. M. (1995). Historia de Roma - La República Romana. Madrid: Cátedra. ISBN 84-376-0307-2)
194. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 5.2.
195. Everitt 2012, p. 28
196. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.38.
197. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.19.
198. Oğuz Tekin: Eski Yunan ve Roma Tarihine Giriş. İletişim, İstanbul, 2008, s. 189.
199. Matyszak 2003, p. 36.
200. Floro séculos I-II, p. I.5.6..
201. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 5.6.
202. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.38.
203. T. Liwiusz: I.41.
204. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.44.
205. Hus 1980, p. 205.
206. Max Dashu: «Patria potestas», suppressedhistories.net
207. Livius: Romas historie, bind 1, Perseus digital library
208. «Ocrisia», pantheon.org
209. Livius: Romas historie, bind 5, hentet fra Wayback Machine
210. Momigliano 1989, pp. 94–96.
211. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 30.
212. Matyszak 2003, pp. 38–39.
213. Cornell 2008, p. 20-21.
214. Mousourakis 2003, p. 59-60. (Mousourakis, Tim (2003). The Historical and Institutional Context of Roman Law. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate)
215. Jasiński, Jakub. «Roman army during kingdom period « IMPERIUM ROMANUM» (en inglés estadounidense). Consultado el 12 de noviembre de 2023.
216. Eutropio, Breviarium ab Urbe condita, I, 7.
217. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: IV.14-15.
218. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 22.
219. Editores 1998. (Editores (1998). «Servius Tullius». Britânica Online)
220. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.21.
221. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.48.
222. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 7.3.
223. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: IV.39-40.
224. Matyszak 2003, p. 40.
225. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.55-56.
226. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.42.
227. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: IV.41.
228. Matyszak 2003, p. 41.
229. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 7.4.
230. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 41.
231. Floro, Epitoma de Tito Livio bellorum omnium annorum DCC, I, 7.5.
232. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.26 e 1.45.
233. Cornell 2008, p. 23.
234. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.44.
235. Heurgon 1993, p. 238.
236. Matyszak 2003, pp. 42–45.
237. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.29.
238. Cartwright, Mark. «Lucio Tarquinio el Soberbio». Enciclopedia de la Historia del Mundo. Consultado el 12 de noviembre de 2023.
239. T. Liwiusz: I.58-59.
240. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.49.
241. Plácido 1991, p. 53. (Plácido, D. (1991). La formación de los estados en el Mediterráneo occidental. Madrid: Síntesis. ISBN 84-7738-104-6)
242. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.30.
243. «La transformación de Roma: de la República al Imperio». Muy Interesante. 25 de octubre de 2023. Consultado el 12 de noviembre de 2023.
244. T. Liwiusz: I.60.
245. Salles 2008b, p. 178. (Salles, Catherine (2008b). Larousse das Civilização Antigas. Vol. II Da Babilônia ao Exército Enterrado Chinês. São Paulo: Larousse do Brasil. ISBN 2-03-505556-3)
246. Livio, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 1.50.
247. Lívio 27-25 a.C., I.20.
248. Hallet 1970, p. 219. (Hallet, J. P. (1970). Over Troubled Waters: The Meaning of the Title Pontifex. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. Baltimore, Marilândia: The Johns Hopkins University Press)
249. Plutarco, Vidas paralelas «Numa Pompilio» 9-11.
250. Sini 1983, p. 22. (Sini, F. (1983). Documenti sacerdotali di Roma antica I: Libri e commentari. Sassari, Itália: Universidade de Sassari)
251. Tondo 1973, p. 20-21. (Tondo, S. (1973). Leges regiae e paricidas. Florença: Leo S. Olschki Editore)
252. Besnier 1953, p. 1. (Besnier, R. (1953). «Les archives privees publiques et religieuses a' Rome au temps des rois». Studi in memorie di E. Albertario. Milão: Giuffrè. p. 3-26)
253. Bickel 1961, p. 303. (Bickel, E. (1961). Lehrbuch der Geschichte der römischen Literatur. Heidelberga: C. Winter)
254. Ramsay 1875a, p. 540-541. (Ramsay, William (1875a). «Flamen». In: Smith, William. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Londres: John Murray)
255. Plutarco século Ib, p. 9.5-10. (Plutarco (século Ib). Vida de Numa Pompílio. [S.l.: s.n.])
256. Staples 1998, p. 154-155. (Staples, Ariadne (1998). From Good Goddess to Vestal Virgins: Sex and Category in Roman Religion. Nova Iorque: Routledge)
257. Antolín 1996, p. 272. (Antolín, Fernando Navarro (1996). Lygdamus. Corpus Tibullianum III.1–6: Lygdami Elegiarum Liber. Leida: Brill. ISBN 9004102108)
258. Cícero 54-51 a.C., p. II.8.17.
259. Smith 1875, p. 1003. (Smith, William (1875). «Salii». In: Smith, William. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Londres: John Murray)
260. Propércio século I a.C., p. IV.105-146. (Propércio (século I a.C.). Elegias. [S.l.: s.n.])
261. Whiston 1875, p. 138-139. (Whiston, Robert (1875). «Arvales Fratres». In: Smith, William. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Londres: John Murray)
262. Dumézil 1970, p. 280-310. (Dumézil, Georges (1970). Archaic Roman Religion with an appendix on the Religion of the Etruscans. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ISBN 0-8018-5481-4)
263. Wilkinson 2010, p. 83. (Wilkinson, Philip (2010). Mitos & Lendas. Origens e Significados. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. ISBN 978-85-7827-327-9)
264. Spaeth 1990, p. 1; 33; 182. (Spaeth, Barbett Stanley (1990). «The Goddess Ceres and the Death of Tiberius Gracchus». Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 39 (2))
265. Palmer 1997, p. 63. (Palmer, Robert E.A. (1997). Rome and Carthage at Peace. Estugarda: Franz Steiner Verlag)
266. Wilkinson 2010, p. 84. (Wilkinson, Philip (2010). Mitos & Lendas. Origens e Significados. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. ISBN 978-85-7827-327-9)
267. Wilkinson 2010, p. 85. (Wilkinson, Philip (2010). Mitos & Lendas. Origens e Significados. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. ISBN 978-85-7827-327-9)
268. Lívio 27-25 a.C., V.14.
269. Roscher 1894, p. 15-55. (Roscher, W. H. (1894). Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie II. Lípsia: B. G. Teubner Verlag)
270. Horácio 17 a.C., p. IV.15.8. (Horácio (17 a.C.). Carmen Saeculare. [S.l.: s.n.])
271. Riis 1953, p. 121. (Riis, Poul Jørgen (1953). An introduction to Etruscan art. Copenhague: Ejnar Munksgaard)
272. Fowler 1908, p. 95. (Fowler, William Warde (1908). The Roman Festivals of the Period of the Republic. Londres: Macmillan)
273. Fowler 1908, p. 96-97. (Fowler, William Warde (1908). The Roman Festivals of the Period of the Republic. Londres: Macmillan)
274. Dionísio de Halicarnasso século I a.C., p. I.32.3-5; I.80. (Dionísio de Halicarnasso (século I a.C.). Das antiguidades romanas. [S.l.: s.n.])
275. Media Hiems 2013. («Lupercalia (Rom., Feb 15; ancient: XV Kal. Mart.)». 2013)
276. Kearns 2003, p. 406. (Kearns, Emily (2003). The Oxford Dictionary of Classical Myth and Religion. Oxônia: Oxford University Press)
277. Thaniel 1973, p. 182-187. (Thaniel, George (1973). «Lemures and Larvae». The American Journal of Philology. 94 (2))
278. Evans 2008, p. 185-188. (Evans, Rhiannon (2008). Utopia antiqua: Readings of the Golden Age and Decline at Rome. Nova Iorque: Routledge)
279. Beard 1998a, p. 45.
280. Chambers 1728, p. 288. (Chambers, Ephraim (1728). Cyclopaedia, or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. Londres: Longman et at.)
281. Nuevatribuna (16 de septiembre de 2022). «Las levas del ejército en la antigua Roma». Nuevatribuna. Consultado el 12 de noviembre de 2023.
282. Boatwright 2004, Řím za vlády králů, s. 56 – 60 (Boatwright, Mary T. et al. (2004), Dějiny římské říše od nejranějších časů po Konstantina Velikého (2012, 1. české vyd.), Praha: Grada, ISBN 978-80-247-3168-1)
283. «The Roman Army». Digital Maps of the Ancient World (en inglés). 5 de mayo de 2022. Consultado el 12 de noviembre de 2023.
284. Lawrence Keppie. The Making of the Roman Army: From Republic to Empire. London : Routledge. 3.-5. lpp. ISBN 0-203-14321-3.
285. 원래 백인대는 아마 전부 정확히 백 명씩 이루어진 게 아니라, 백 명의 군인들을 제공해야 할 책임이 있는 집단을 일컬었을 것이다. 각 집단에서 백 명을 받아 지휘하는 장교는 자연히 백인대장(centurion, 백부장)으로 불리게 된다. 《로마사》, 프리츠 하이켈하임 저, p.77.
286. Lendon 2005, p. 182. (Lendon, J.E. (2005). Soldiers & Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity. Londres e New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-11979-8)
287. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Chauvot et Martin 2003, p. 32.
288. Ibáñez, Juan Antonio (12 de junio de 2021). «La reforma de Servio Tulio De Imperios a Naciones». De Imperios a Naciones. Consultado el 12 de noviembre de 2023.
289. "Palatinus (Palatine Hill)". www.penelope.uchicago.edu. Truy cập ngày 17 tháng 4 năm 2021.
290. Giovanni Colonna, Milieu, peuplement, phases naturelles, in Naissance de Rome, catalogue d'exposition au Petit Palais, 1977
291. Giovanni Colonna, « Milieu, peuplement, phases naturelles » (catalogue d’exposition au Petit Palais), Naissance de Rome,‎ 1977.
292. (fr) Pierre Grimal, La Civilisation romaine, Paris, Flammarion, 1981, p. 24.
293. В. И. Кузищин. Указ. соч. — С. 53 — 54.
294. «Monedas romanas: As». www.monete-romane.com. Consultado el 12 de noviembre de 2023.
295. Watson 1991, p. cap. 8. (Watson, Alan (1991). Legal origins and legal change. Londres e Nova Iorque: Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 1-85285-048-5)
296. Valditara 1989. (Valditara, Giuseppe (1989). Studi sul magister populi: dagli ausiliari militari del rex ai primi magistrati repubblicani. Milão: Giuffrè)
297. Amelotti 1989, p. 19-21. (Amelotti, Mario (1989). Lineamenti di storia del diritto romano. Milão: Giuffrè)
298. Hus 1980, p. 250-251.
299. Pugliese 2012, p. 11. (Pugliese, Giovanni (2012). Istituzioni di diritto romano. Turim: G. Giappichelli. ISBN 978-88-348-2854-0)
300. Plutarco século Id, p. 23. (Plutarco (século Id). Morália. [S.l.: s.n.])
301. Dionísio de Halicarnasso século I a.C., p. IV.15.5. (Dionísio de Halicarnasso (século I a.C.). Das antiguidades romanas. [S.l.: s.n.])
302. Kyle 2001, p. 166. (Kyle, Donald G. (2001). Spectacles of Death in Ancient Rome. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0415248426)
303. Richardson 1992, p. 409. (Richardson (1992). A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Baltimore, Marilândia: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0801843006)
304. Cary 1976, p. 55.
305. Jannuzzi 2005, p. 80. (Jannuzzi, Giovanni (2005). Breve historia de Italia. Buenos Aires: Letemendía. ISBN 987-21732-7-3)
306. La cronologia della monarchia romana fu codificata da Marco Terenzio Varrone e abbraccia un periodo di 243 anni, che è un periodo più lungo di quello di qualsiasi dinastia storicamente documentata e presenta una media straordinaria di regno per ognuno dei sette monarchi di oltre 35 anni. Questa cronologia è stata fortemente discussa e criticata dagli studiosi moderni
307. Lívio 27-25 a.C., II.3-4.
308. Lívio 27-25 a.C., II.5.
309. Cornell 2016.
310. Momigliano 1989, pp. 93–94.
311. Christol et Nony 2003, p. 39.
312. Havell 2003, p. 69. (Havell, H. L. (2003). Ancient Rome. The Republic. Glásgua: Geddes & Grosset. ISBN 1-84205-186-5)
313. Matyszak 2003, p. 43-45.
314. Lívio 27-25 a.C., II.2.1..
315. Momigliano 1975, p. 311-312. (Momigliano, Arnaldo (1975). Quinto Contributo Alla Storia Degli Studi Classici E Del Mondo Antico. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura)
316. Cornell 2008, p. 22.
317. Le Glay 1990, p. 60.